Cited by 11Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and Fertility

Endometriosis does not Alter Aromatase Gene Expression (CYP19A1) in Mural Lutein-granulosa Cells of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques – a Pilot Study

De Abreu, Lauriane G., Silveira, Vanessa S., Scrideli, Carlos A., Ramos, Ester S., Dos Reis, Rosana M., Ferriani, Rui A., De Sá, Marcos F. Silva·2011·Journal of Endometriosis

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify aromatase gene expression in mural lutein-granulosa cells of women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproduction techniques (ART, IVF or ICSI). Methods: a case-control study was performed on 11 women with endometriosis (all stages, ASRM criteria) and 11 women with male or tubal causes of infertility undergoing ART. There was no difference between the groups regarding age, amount of gonadotrophins used, days of induction, follicles, and eggs collected. Mural lutein-granulosa cells were harvested from pre-ovulatory follicles during oocyte retrieval and correctly isolated. After cells lyses and storage into Trizol LS Reagent®, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed. Quantification of relative gene expression for CYP19A1 (aromatase) was performed by real time PCR, using SYBR Green reagents. All experiments were performed in duplicates. Results: there was no difference between the groups in the quantitative gene expression of CYP19A1 (aromatase) gene on mural lutein-granulosa cells (P>.05, Mann Whitney). Conclusions: These results suggest that this enzyme, aromatase, may have a complex and refined control of its gene expression on this population of granulosa cells, and in spite of previous evidence showing its reduced activity on these cells in endometriosis, gene expression per se may not be affected by the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5301/je.2012.9070

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Abreu, L. G., Silveira, V. S., Scrideli, C. A., Ramos, E. S., Dos Reis, R. M., Ferriani, R. A., & De Sá, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP - Brazil
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Journal of Endometriosis
Published
2011-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
177-182
ISSN
  • 2035-9969 (ISSN-L)
  • 2036-282X
OpenAlex
W1653964899
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
endometriosis, aromatase, CYP19A1, gene expression, assisted reproduction, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, female infertility, preovulatory follicles, oocyte retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review