Cited by 5,670Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Ben Van Den, Assem·2020·International Coaching Psychology Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boland, A. , Cherry, M.G. & Dickson, R. (Eds.) (2017). Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
  2. Booth, A. , Sutton, A. & Papaioannou, D. (Eds.) (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, 2nd edn. London: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,059

Metadata

Authors
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A.
Venue
International Coaching Psychology Review
Published
2020
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
123-125
ISSN
  • 1750-2764 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8753
OpenAlex
W4320164613
Cited by
5,670
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 839 · 2023: 903 · 2022: 875 · 2021: 780 · 2020: 427
FWCI
154.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Coaching Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
systematic reviews, intervention research, evidence synthesis, research methodology, coaching psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review