Cited by 62Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Clinical relevance of sleep duration: results from a cross-sectional analysis using NHANES

Open access
Cepeda, M. Soledad, Stang, Paul, Blacketer, Clair, Kent, Justine M., Wittenberg, Gayle M.·2016·Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives To assess the clinical relevance of sleep duration, hours slept were compared by health status, presence of insomnia, and presence of depression, and the association of sleep duration with BMI and cardiovascular risk was quantified.Methods Cross-sectional analysis of subjects in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys using adjusted linear and logistic regressions.Results A total of 22,281 adults were included, 37% slept ≤ 6 hours, 36% were obese, and 45% reported cardiovascular conditions. Mean sleep duration was 6.87 hours. Better health was associated with more hours of sleep. Subjects with poor health reported sleeping 46 min, (95% CI -56.85 to -35.67) less than subjects with excellent health. Individuals with depression (vs. not depressed) reported 40 min less sleep, (95% CI -47.14 to -32.85). Individuals with insomnia (vs. without insomnia) reported 39 min less sleep, (95% CI -56.24 to -22.45). Duration of sleep was inversely related to BMI; for every additional hour of sleep, there was a decrease of 0.18 kg/m(2) in BMI, (95% CI -0.30 to -0.06). The odds of reporting cardiovascular problems were 6.0% lower for every hour of sleep (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% CI [0.91 to 0.97]). Compared with subjects who slept ≤ 6 h, subjects who slept more had lower odds of reporting cardiovascular problems, with the exception of subjects ≥ 55 years old who slept ≥ 9 hours.Conclusions Long sleep duration is associated with better health. The fewer the hours of sleep, the greater the BMI and reported cardiovascular disease. A difference of 30 minutes of sleep is associated with substantive impact on clinical well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.5876

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After consulting meta-analyses and high-quality cohort studies on the dose-response relationship between sleep duration and major health outcomes, the review concluded that an increase of 0.73 hours for short sleepers would have a clinically relevant beneficial effect on a range of outcomes.

    “After discussion with the authors of these reviews, we concluded that an increase of 0.73 hours for short sleepers would have a clinically relevant beneficial effect on a range of outcomes.”

    From Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers (2023) · cites this paper as Cepeda 2016

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]5. Sigurdson K, Ayas NT. The public health and safety consequences of sleep disorders. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2007;85:179-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cepeda, M. S., Stang, P., Blacketer, C., Kent, J. M., & Wittenberg, G. M.
Affiliations
Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Cepeda, M. Soledad
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2016-06-15
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
813-819
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W2396511469
Cited by
62
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep duration, short sleep duration, long sleep, insomnia, depression, body mass index, obesity, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk, health status, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Time Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review