Cited by 592Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Sleep problems: an emerging global epidemic? Findings from the INDEPTH WHO-SAGE study among more than 40,000 older adults from 8 countries across Africa and Asia

Open access
Stranges, Saverio, Tigbe, William, Gómez-Olivé, Francesc Xavier, Thorogood, Margaret, Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin·2012·Sleep

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of sleep problems and the effect of potential correlates in low-income settings from Africa and Asia, where the evidence is lacking. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Community-wide samples from 8 countries across Africa and Asia participating in the INDEPTH WHO-SAGE multicenter collaboration during 2006-2007. The participating sites included rural populations in Ghana, Tanzania, South Africa, India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Indonesia, and an urban area in Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: There were 24,434 women and 19,501 men age 50 yr and older. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two measures of sleep quality, over the past 30 days, were assessed alongside a number of sociodemographic variables, measures of quality of life, and comorbidities. Overall, 16.6% of participants reported severe/extreme nocturnal sleep problems, with a striking variation across the 8 populations, ranging from 3.9% (Purworejo, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya) to more than 40.0% (Matlab, Bangladesh). There was a consistent pattern of higher prevalence of sleep problems in women and older age groups. In bivariate analyses, lower education, not living in partnership, and poorer self-rated quality of life were consistently associated with higher prevalence of sleep problems (P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, limited physical functionality or greater disability and feelings of depression and anxiety were consistently strong, independent correlates of sleep problems, in both women and men, across the 8 sites (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A large number of older adults in low-income settings are currently experiencing sleep problems, which emphasizes the global dimension of this emerging public health issue. This study corroborates the multifaceted nature of sleep problems, which are strongly linked to poorer general well-being and quality of life, and psychiatric comorbidities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.2012

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of sleep disruption observed in medical students is higher than in the general population.

    “The prevalence herein observed is higher than in the general population, which was 16.6% in Asia and Africa prevalence, 62 20% in Canada and the US, 63,64 22.7% in Latin America, 65 23% in Japan, and 31% in Western Europe.66”

    From Sleep disruption in medicine students and its relationship with impaired academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results report that 16.6% of participants had nocturnal sleep problems. However, the study sampled adults aged 50–106 at eight sites in Africa and Asia, not the general population across those continents. It does not compare that prevalence with medical students. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]22. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993;2:153-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stranges, S., Tigbe, W., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Thorogood, M., & Kandala, N.-B.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Stranges, Saverio
Venue
Sleep
Published
2012-08
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1173-1181
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1978295404
Cited by
592
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Wellcome Trust (058893, 069683, 058893/Z/ 99/A)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (058893/Z/99/A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
sleep disorders, older adults, sleep quality, prevalence, low-income settings, quality of life, physical disability, depression, anxiety, sociodemographic factors, sex differences, Africa, Asia
MeSH terms
Africa, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anxiety, Asia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Rural Population, Sex Factors, Sleep Wake Disorders, Socioeconomic Factors, World Health Organization, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review