Cited by 73Nutritional Studies and DietDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

The association of meat intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes may be modified by body weight

Open access
Villegas, Raquel, Shu, Xiao Ou, Gao, Yu-Tang, Yang, Gong, Cai, Hui, Li, Honglan, Zheng, Wei·2006·International Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the association between meat intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes (type 2 DM) in a large cohort of middle-aged women. DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Incident cases of type 2 DM were identified during an average of 4.6 years of follow-up in a prospective cohort study of 74,493 middle-aged, Chinese women (mean age +/- SD =51.7+/- 8.97 years). Participants completed in-person interviews that collected information on type 2 DM risk factors such as dietary factors and physical activity in adulthood. Anthropometric indices were measured. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). We included in the current analysis 70,609 women who had no prior history of type 2 DM at study recruitment and who had valid dietary data. The association of type 2 DM with unprocessed meat intake (g/day) and the frequency of consumption of processed meat was evaluated using the Cox model with adjustment for age, kcals/day, body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio (WHR), vegetable intake, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income level, education level, occupation status, and history of hypertension and chronic disease at baseline. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: We identified 1972 incident cases of type 2 DM during a total of 326,581 person-years of follow up. Intake of unprocessed meat, particularly poultry, was associated with a decrease in the risk of type 2 DM in this cohort. The fully adjusted relative risks (RRs) for quintiles of total unprocessed meat intake were 1.00, 0.78, 0.83, 0.74, and 0.83 (P for trend: <0.01). When the joint effect between meat intake and BMI categories was evaluated, high intake of total unprocessed meat appeared to be associated with an increased risk of type 2 DM among obese women but a reduced risk among lean women (P value for the interaction tests = 0.05). Processed meat consumption was positively associated with the risk of type 2 DM. The adjusted RR was 1.15 (95% 1.01-1.32) in women consuming processed meats compared to those who did not consume processed meats (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Processed meat intake was positively associated with the risk of type 2 DM. There was an indication that the effect of unprocessed meat intake on type 2 DM may be modified by BMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/ijms.3.152

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yang G, Wang G, Pan X. China Food Composition. Beiging: Peking University Medical Press, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villegas, R., Shu, X. O., Gao, Y.-T., Yang, G., Cai, H., Li, H., & Zheng, W.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Shanghai Cancer Institute (CN)
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US)
Venue
International Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2006
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
152-159
ISSN
1449-1907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146214285
Cited by
73
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA070867)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, meat consumption, processed meat, poultry, body mass index, obesity, body weight, dietary risk factors, middle-aged women, Chinese women, interaction effects, diabetes incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review