Cited by 65Nutritional Studies and DietMeat and Animal Product QualityDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

High processed meat consumption is a risk factor of type 2 diabetes in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention study

Open access
Männistö, Satu, Kontto, Jukka, Kataja-Tuomola, Merja, Albanes, Demetrius, Virtamo, Jarmo·2010·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Relatively small lifestyle modifications related to weight reduction, physical activity and diet have been shown to decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes. Connected with diet, low consumption of meat has been suggested as a protective factor of diabetes. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between the consumption of total meat or the specific types of meats and the risk of type 2 diabetes. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention cohort included middle-aged male smokers. Up to 12 years of follow-up, 1098 incident cases of diabetes were diagnosed from 24 845 participants through the nationwide register. Food consumption was assessed by a validated FFQ. In the age- and intervention group-adjusted model, high total meat consumption was a risk factor of type 2 diabetes (relative risk (RR) 1·50, 95 % CI 1·23, 1·82, highest v.lowest quintile). The result was similar after adjustment for environmental factors and foods related to diabetes and meat consumption. The RR of type 2 diabetes was 1·37 for processed meat (95 % CI 1·11, 1·71) in the multivariate model. The results were explained more by intakes of Na than by intakes of SFA, protein, cholesterol, haeme Fe, Mg and nitrate, and were not modified by obesity. No association was found between red meat, poultry and the risk of type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, reduction of the consumption of processed meat may help prevent the global epidemic of type 2 diabetes. It seems like Na of processed meat may explain the association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114510000073

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Männistö, S., Kontto, J., Kataja-Tuomola, M., Albanes, D., & Virtamo, J.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Männistö, Satu
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2010-02-26
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
1817-1822
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W1977848386
Cited by
65
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (N01-RC- 45035, N01RC37004, n01rc37004-9-0-0, n01cn045165-030, N01 RC037004)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01 CN045165, N01 CN 45165, ZIACP010195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, processed meat, meat consumption, dietary sodium, red meat, poultry, diabetes risk factors, dietary intake, smokers, middle-aged men, dietary protein
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Food Handling, Humans, Male, Meat, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Obesity, Poultry, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Treatment Outcome, Sodium Chloride, Dietary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review