Cited by 154Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Association between dietary meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct study

Open access
The InterAct Consortium·2013·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis A diet rich in meat has been reported to contribute to the risk of type 2 diabetes. The present study aims to investigate the association between meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes in the EPIC-InterAct study, a large prospective case-cohort study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.Methods During 11.7 years of follow-up, 12,403 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were identified among 340,234 adults from eight European countries. A centre-stratified random subsample of 16,835 individuals was selected in order to perform a case-cohort design. Prentice-weighted Cox regression analyses were used to estimate HR and 95% CI for incident diabetes according to meat consumption.Results Overall, multivariate analyses showed significant positive associations with incident type 2 diabetes for increasing consumption of total meat (50 g increments: HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05, 1.12), red meat (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03, 1.13) and processed meat (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05, 1.19), and a borderline positive association with meat iron intake. Effect modifications by sex and class of BMI were observed. In men, the results of the overall analyses were confirmed. In women, the association with total and red meat persisted, although attenuated, while an association with poultry consumption also emerged (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07, 1.34). These associations were not evident among obese participants.Conclusions/interpretation This prospective study confirms a positive association between high consumption of total and red meat and incident type 2 diabetes in a large cohort of European adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-012-2718-7

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both red and processed meats, regardless of fat content, are linked to higher incidence of diabetes, although with approximately double the risk, gram-for-gram, for processed meats than for unprocessed red meats.

    “Interestingly, both red and processed meats, regardless of fat content, are linked to higher incidence of diabetes, although with approximately double the risk, gram-for-gram, for processed meats than for unprocessed red meats.172, 178”
  • Large studies evaluating poultry and incident diabetes have shown mixed results including higher risk, no risk, and lower risk.

    “Large studies evaluating poultry and incident diabetes have shown mixed results including higher risk, no risk, and lower risk.178, 190-195”
  • While unprocessed red meats and butter may be relatively neutral for CHD, no studies demonstrate appreciable benefits, all meats appear to increase diabetes, and processed meats are strongly linked to CHD.

    “While unprocessed red meats and butter may be relatively neutral for CHD, no studies demonstrate appreciable benefits, all meats appear to increase diabetes, and processed meats are strongly linked to CHD (see Meats, above).20, 29, 173, 178”
  • Potential confounders were a priori selected based on the literature on red meat intake and diabetes risk and prior investigations in EPIC-Potsdam.

    “Potential confounders to be included as covariates were a priori selected based on the literature on the association between red meat intake and diabetes risk (2, 3) and prior investigations in EPIC-Potsdam regarding risk factors of type 2 diabetes (5), dietary patterns (27), and determinants of metabolic profiles (28,29).”
  • Red meat consumption has consistently been associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in several large cohort studies and summarized by several meta-analyses.

    “Red meat consumption has consistently been associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in several large cohort studies and summarized by several meta-analyses (1-3).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The InterAct Consortium
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2012-09-16
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
47-59
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2394915398
Cited by
154
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10114)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, meat consumption, red meat, processed meat, poultry, iron intake, sex differences, obesity, diabetes risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Meat, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Iron, Dietary, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review