Cited by 519Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease: Predicting Risks by Levels and Ratios

Kinosian, Bruce, Glick, Henry, Garland, Gonzalo·1994·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of four measures of cholesterol for predicting men and women who will develop coronary heart disease within 8 to 10 years. DESIGN: Cohort study. PATIENTS: 1898 men who received placebo (the placebo group of the Lipid Research Clinics [LRC] Coronary Primary Prevention Trial [CPPT]), 1025 men and 1442 women who participated in the 1970-1971 Framingham Heart Study biennial examination, and 1911 men and 1767 women without coronary heart disease who were from the LRC Population Prevalence Study. MEASUREMENTS: Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and the ratio of LDL to HDL. Outcomes were coronary heart disease in the CPPT and Framingham studies and death from coronary heart disease in the Prevalence Study. RESULTS: Independent information in the total cholesterol/HDL ratio added risk-discriminating ability to total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol measures (P < 0.02), but the reverse was not true. Among women, a high-risk threshold of 5.6 for the total cholesterol/HDL ratio identified a 0% to 15% larger group at 25% to 45% greater risk in the Prevalence and Framingham studies, respectively, than did current guidelines. Among men in the same studies, a risk threshold of 6.4 for the total cholesterol/HDL ratio identified a 69% to 95% larger group at 2% to 14% greater risk than did LDL cholesterol levels alone. Eight-year likelihood ratios for coronary heart disease ranged from 0.32 to 3.11 in men and from 0.59 to 2.98 in women for total cholesterol/HDL ratios (grouped from < 3 to > or = 9). CONCLUSIONS: The total cholesterol/HDL ratio is a superior measure of risk for coronary heart disease compared with either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol levels. Current practice guidelines could be more efficient if risk stratification was based on this ratio rather than primarily on the LDL cholesterol level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-121-9-199411010-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinosian, B., Glick, H., & Garland, G.
Affiliations
Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kinosian, Bruce
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1994-11-01
Volume
121
Issue
9
Pages
641-647
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2081535404
Cited by
519
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r29ag009837-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA R29-AG09837-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
coronary artery disease, TC/HDL-C ratio, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, risk prediction, risk stratification, risk thresholds, sex differences, likelihood ratios, Framingham Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review