The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Logic of Political Survival
Abstract
The authors of this ambitious book address a fundamental political question: why are leaders who produce peace and prosperity turned out of office while those who preside over corruption, war, and misery endure? Considering this political puzzle, they also answer the related economic question of why some countries experience successful economic development and others do not. The authors construct a provocative theory on the selection of leaders and present specific formal models from which their central claims can be deduced. They show how political leaders allocate resources and how institutions for selecting leaders create incentives for leaders to pursue good and bad public policy. They also extend the model to explain the consequences of war on political survival. Throughout the book, they provide illustrations from history, ranging from ancient Sparta to Vichy France, and test the model against statistics gathered from cross-national data. The authors explain the political intuition underlying their theory in nontechnical language, reserving formal proofs for chapter appendixes. They conclude by presenting policy prescriptions based on what has been demonstrated theoretically and empirically.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) argue that public spending can be used to 'buy' allegiance and thus reduce the risk that the people will support challengers to the ruling elite.”
From The Ba'athist blackout? Selective goods provision and political violence in the Syrian civil war (2015) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003)
In the citing paper
“In democratic countries, politicians ' fate is ultimately determined in electoral competition between parties or candidates.”
From Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state capacity, and COVID-19-related school closures around the world (2022) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“In autocratic countries, by contrast, political leaders ' survival in office is dependent on ensuring the support of a much smaller coalition”
From Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state capacity, and COVID-19-related school closures around the world (2022) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“In a political system characterized by a small winning coalition and a large selectorate, members of the winning coalitions have fewer incentives to defect and join opposition groups; thus, leaders prefer to distribute private goods over public ones.”
From Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political institutions and state capacity (2023) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“Bueno de Mesquita et al . (2003) demonstrate that autocrats ' decisions on the distribution of public and private goods depend on the size of the ruling coalition -the segment of the population that supports the leader -relative to the size of the selectorate”
From Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political institutions and state capacity (2023) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,004
Buying Peace? Oil Wealth, Corruption and Civil War, 1985—99
Fjelde, H. (2009) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343308100715 · Cited by 172
Remittances and Democratization
Escribà-Folch, A., Meseguer, C., & Wright, J. (2015) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12180 · Cited by 169
“…goods to top party o ffi cials and other elites (patronage), but also on the delivery of (often local) public goods to larger segments of the population (clientelism) aimed at mobilizing mass support (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Magaloni and Kricheli 2010; Malesky, Abrami and Zheng 2011).”
BackgroundParty Strength and Economic Growth
Bizzarro, F., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Hicken, A. D., Bernhard, M. H., Skaaning, S., Coppedge, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2018) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887117000375 · Cited by 185
“But this is expensive when leaders try to cater to different constituencies, as will often be the case in countries led by strong parties, inducing politicians to instead prioritize public goods spending. see Bueno de mesquita et al. 2003.”
BackgroundFactions and finance in China: elite conflict and inflation
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1019 · Cited by 167
Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in ChinaPreprint
Chen, J., Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2479953 · Cited by 169
“The logic for greater responsiveness to loyal insiders relates to the need for authoritarian leaders to maintain a stable winning coalition (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2004; Haber 2006).”
BackgroundThe Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off in Dictatorships and Outside Options for Subordinates
Zakharov, A. V. (2016) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/684365 · Cited by 160
“An autocrat faces a number of threats, such as elite schisms, betrayal, or public unrest (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Egorov and Sonin 2011; Svolik 2012); dealing with these threats takes effort on behalf of his lieutenants.”
BackgroundThe Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity
Brown, D. S., & Mobarak, A. M. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409090200 · Cited by 166
Knutsen, C. H., Nygård, H. M., & Wig, T. (2016) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887116000149 · Cited by 179
“…can target external opposition actors and potential threats within the regime.18 Elections can be used to co-opt threats directly, by offering well-performing opposition groups and individuals spoils through legislature seats,19 or indirectly, 15 Wintrobe 1998; Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
BackgroundLying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China
Jiang, J., & Yang, D.-L. L. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015626450 · Cited by 142
Midlarsky, M. I. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491023 · Cited by 169
V-Dem Codebook v11Preprint
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3802627 · Cited by 167
Income, Democracy, and Leader Turnover
Treisman, D. S. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12135 · Cited by 166
Forced to Be Free?: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Rarely Leads to Democratization
Downes, A. B., & Monten, J. (2013) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00117 · Cited by 113
Coming into Money: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Leader Survival
Licht, A. A. (2009) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002709351104 · Cited by 165
“When loyalty is high (winning coalition small), leaders may safely reserve more of the state budget for personal use “if they find themselves at risk of being deposed” (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2005, 93).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Comparison of International and Domestic Sources of Global Governance Dynamics
Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2010) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123410000098 · Cited by 166
Earthquake Propensity and the Politics of Mortality Prevention
Keefer, P., Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.010 · Cited by 165
Democracy, State Capacity, and Economic Growth
Knutsen, C. H. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.014 · Cited by 170
“…is that dictatorial regimes’ propensity to select ‘bad policies’ in order to enhance personal consumption or political survival (e.g. Robinson, 1998; Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Acemoglu & Robinson, 2006a; Miquel, 2007) is aggravated in contexts of weak stateinstitutional structures.”
BackgroundInfluentialYour Place or Mine? Institutional Capture and the Creation of Overlapping International Institutions
Urpelainen, J., & de Graaf, T. V. (2014) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000537 · Cited by 167
“31 Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime
Do, Q.-A., Nguyen, K.-T., & Tran, A. (2017) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20130472 · Cited by 162
Rethinking immigration policy theory beyond ‘Western liberal democracies’
Natter, K. (2018) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-018-0071-9 · Cited by 205
“In this vein, Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) have argued that authoritarian states rely not on an ‘electorate’, but on a ‘selectorate’ for their survival.”
BackgroundWhy Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture?
Hollyer, J. R., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00010059 · Cited by 177
“We also rely on data from Banks’ Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive (Banks 1979) (drawn from the dataset made available by Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003)) to measure riots, strikes, revolutions, demonstrations, and other anti-government activities.”
MethodDrafting Support for War: Conscription and Mass Support for Warfare
Horowitz, M. C., & Levendusky, M. S. (2011) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381611000119 · Cited by 162
Gibler, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002707310003 · Cited by 162
How naming and shaming affects human rights perceptions in the shamed country
Ausderan, J. (2014) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343313510014 · Cited by 158
“I also control for an objective measure of political development: the winning coalition size in a survey respondent’s country during the year prior to their survey response being collected (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003).(6) Although scholars have produced conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between econo…”
Power and the Vote: Elections and Electricity in the Developing World
Min, B. (2015) · Cited by 161
The Political Economy of Development in China and Vietnam
Malesky, E. J., & London, J. D. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041811-150032 · Cited by 161
Buhaug, H. (2010) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894209343974 · Cited by 164
“As a result, strongly authoritarian systems are remarkably stable; their leaders often remain in power considerably longer than do democratically elected leaders (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1999, 2003), even if autocracy as a system may be less durable than democracy.”
BackgroundRural electrification, electrification inequality and democratic institutions in sub-Saharan Africa
Trotter, P. A. (2016) · Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.008 · Cited by 169
The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in DictatorshipsPreprint
Boix, C., & Svolik, M. W. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1352065 · Cited by 148
Liberal democracy and sustainability
Ward, H. (2008) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010802055626 · Cited by 170
“…control of a high fraction of society’s resources encourages them to pay off members of their relatively small support coalition by allowing them to pillage the ecosystem, as there is less political advantage in providing public goods such as environmental quality (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003).”
BackgroundStrategic Logic of Elite Purges in Dictatorships
Sudduth, J. K. (2017) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016688004 · Cited by 157
“…for the observed patterns might be that, first, a 25 new leader must convince his supporters at the outset of his tenure that he will remain loyal to them by excluding other powerful elites in order to strengthen the loyalty norm (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Albertus & Menaldo, 2012).”
BackgroundJudicial Power in Domestic and International Politics
Staton, J. K., & Moore, W. H. (2011) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818311000130 · Cited by 148
“See Smith (1996); Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003); Clark (2003).”
The Lay of the Land: Information Capacity and the Modern State
Brambor, T., Goenaga, A., Lindvall, J., & Teorell, J. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019843432 · Cited by 163
Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory*
Wiens, D. (2011) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00387.x · Cited by 154
“Cf. Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003 and McGillivray and Smith 2008.”
BackgroundColgan, J. D. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342476 · Cited by 154
Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War
de Mesquita, B. B., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. M. (2004) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2004.0017 · Cited by 152
Self-citationElectoral Manipulation as Bureaucratic Control
Gehlbach, S. G., & Simpser, A. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12122 · Cited by 153
Elite Defection under Autocracy: Evidence from Russia
Reuter, O. J., & Szakonyi, D. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055419000030 · Cited by 155
Democratic memberships in international organizations: Sources of institutional design
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., & Squatrito, T. (2015) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-015-9227-7 · Cited by 152
“…range of international political phenomena, including trade liberalization (Mansfield et al. 2000; Kono 2006), public-goods provision (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Bättig and Bernauer 2009), human rights protection (Moravcsik 2000; Simmons and Danner 2010), democracy promotion (Pevehouse…”
BackgroundModel-based Clustering and Typologies in the Social Sciences
Ahlquist, J. S., & Breunig, C. (2011) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr039 · Cited by 158
“For example, a long-standing and ongoing debate in comparative politics surrounds the classification of political systems ( Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Vanhanen 2003; Marshall, Jaggers, and Gurr 2004; Treier and Jackman 2008; Pemstein, Meserve, and Melton 2010).”
BackgroundBushwhacking the Democratic Peace
Russett, B. M. (2005) · International Studies Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00217.x · Cited by 157
Beyond state capacity: bureaucratic performance, policy implementation and reform
Williams, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137420000478 · Cited by 150
“…between policy choice and policy implementation has long been criticized in public administration (Fesler and Kettl 1991), and even within dictatorships numerous studies demonstrate that actual authority and decision power is dispersed across multiple actors (Bueno de Mesquita et al 2003).”
BackgroundWhy Do Voters Dismantle Checks and Balances?
Acemoğlu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Torvik, R. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt007 · Cited by 150
Why we need a new theory of government
Levi, M. (2006) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592706060038 · Cited by 149
Kapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817809 · Cited by 149
An Experimental Investigation of Electoral Delegation and the Provision of Public Goods
Hamman, J. R., Weber, R. A., & Woon, J. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00531.x · Cited by 142
“…to act in the public interest rather than in their own private interest (Barro 1973; Ferejohn 1986), there are also strong incentives for majority tyranny—for the official to exploit a minority of the group for the benefit of a minimum winning coalition (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Riker 1962).”
BackgroundCountering Coups: Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships
Frantz, E., & Stein, E. A. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016655538 · Cited by 149
Barriers to Peace in Civil War
Cunningham, D. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511993374 · Cited by 151
Shih, V. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608081139 · Cited by 146
State Capacity and Economic Development
Dincecco, M. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108539913 · Cited by 175
Economic Sanctions and Human Security: The Public Health Effect of Economic Sanctions
Peksen, D. (2011) · Foreign Policy Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00136.x · Cited by 152
Repression, Dissent, and the Onset of Civil War
Young, J. K. (2012) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912912452485 · Cited by 151
“On average, this should lead to greater support for government policies.21 As Bueno de Mesquita et al. (1999, 2003) argue, states with democratic institutions should produce policies that are beneficial to a larger number of citizens.”
BackgroundOil and Revolutionary Governments: Fuel for International Conflict
Colgan, J. D. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081831000024x · Cited by 148
Social Revolution and Authoritarian Durability
Lachapelle, J., Levitsky, S., Way, L. A., & Casey, A. E. (2020) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887120000106 · Cited by 154
“160 For example, see Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
BackgroundThe Costs of Favoritism: Is Politically-Driven Aid Less Effective?Preprint
Dreher, A., Klasen, S., Vreeland, J. R., et al. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1574787 · Cited by 147
The Determinants of Economic Sanctions Success and Failure
Allen, S. H. (2005) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050620590950097 · Cited by 147
“As the economic fortunes of the state are likely tied to the selectorate’s evaluation of the leader’s performance ( Bueno de Mesquita, et al, 2003 ), his or her fate may be dependent on how the challenge of sanctions is met.”
BackgroundEconomic and Security Regionalism among Patrimonial Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Central Asia
Collins, K. (2009) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668130802630854 · Cited by 146
“2003 ), and neither seeks the overall welfare of the population or state.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Autocratic Welfare State: Old-Age Pensions, Credible Commitments, and Regime Survival
Knutsen, C. H., & Rasmussen, M. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414017710265 · Cited by 146
“This follows the general logic of Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), in that regimes with smaller “winning coalitions” (i.e., fewer critical supporters) prefer funneling resources to these select supporters—leaving them with larger individual rewards and greater potential income loss if the regime…”
BackgroundInfluentialDemocracy and climate change policies: Is history important?
Fredriksson, P. G., & Neumayer, E. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.002 · Cited by 149
The Invisible Hand of Peace: Capitalism, the War Machine, and International Relations Theory
McDonald, P. J. (2009) · Cited by 145
Do Output Contractions Trigger Democratic Change?
Burke, P. J., & Leigh, A. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.2.4.124 · Cited by 176
Weingast, B. R. V. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1153440 · Cited by 140
The Middle East and North Africa’s Resilient Monarchs
Menaldo, V. (2012) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381612000436 · Cited by 185
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) aver that an insider’s loyalty is inversely related to the size of the group of regime insiders; therefore, a dictator’s best strategy is to curtail the size of the ‘‘winning coalition’’ by buying off supporters with targeted private goods.”
BackgroundSegura-Ubiergo, A. (2012) · Cited by 136
How Smart and Tough are Democracies? Reassessing Theories of Democratic Victory in War
Downes, A. B. (2009) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.2009.33.4.9 · Cited by 141
Venezuela: Crowding Out the Opposition
Corrales, J., & Penfold-Becerra, M. (2007) · Journal of democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2007.0020 · Cited by 141
The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?
Barberá, P., & Zeitzoff, T. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx047 · Cited by 142
Generals, Dictators, and Kings
Fjelde, H. (2010) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894210366507 · Cited by 138
“…one’s loyalty behind a challenging faction is very high, taking into account the loss of ample personal privilege in case of failure (Geddes, 1999a) and the low possibility of being included in future ruling coalitions given the large pool of eligible candidates (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCoercion, Co-optation, or Cooperation?
Fjelde, H., & de Soysa, I. (2009) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894208097664 · Cited by 147
“It is often noted that high government spending does not necessarily mean more efficient allocation of public goods, such as health and education, but it may lead to greater rents to powerful constituents (c.f. Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2002, 2003; Azam, 2001).”
BackgroundMattes, M., Leeds, B. A., & Carroll, R. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12175 · Cited by 135
Diversionary Despots? Comparing Autocracies' Propensities to Use and to Benefit from Military Force
Pickering, J., & Kisangani, E. F. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00442.x · Cited by 132
Threats to Territorial Integrity, National Mass Schooling, and Linguistic Commonality
Darden, K. A., & Mylonas, H. (2015) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015606735 · Cited by 141
Can Terrorism Abroad Influence Migration Attitudes at Home?
Böhmelt, T., Bove, V., & Nussio, E. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12494 · Cited by 135
“Politicians, assumed to be office-seeking and interested in retaining power (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2005), take into account citizens’ concerns about political issues, which in turn shapes how the government responds with legislative action (e.g., Anderson et al. 2017).”
BackgroundWar and Revenge: Explaining Conflict Initiation by Democracies
Stein, R. M. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055415000301 · Cited by 137
How Modern Dictators Survive: An Informational Theory of the New Authoritarianism
Guriev, S. M., & Treisman, D. S. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21136 · Cited by 140
“These works examine how the dictator chooses the size and characteristics of his inner circle, and how these variables in turn determine the dictator’s policy choices and survival odds (Egorov and Sonin 2011, Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003).”
International political economy: A field born of the OPEC crisis returns to its energy roots
Hancock, K. J., & Vivoda, V. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.017 · Cited by 134
“One assumption many political scientists take as given is the “logic of political survival,” in which the analyst assumes that all political leaders want first and foremost to remain in power [97].”
BackgroundHow Institutions Evolve: Evolutionary Theory and Institutional Change
Lewis, O. A., & Steinmo, S. H. (2012) · Polity · doi:10.1057/pol.2012.10 · Cited by 131
Sullivan, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002714567951 · Cited by 140
“For relevant work, see Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), De Mesquita and Smith (2010), Moore (2000), Rasler (1996), Ritter (2014), and Shellman (2006).”
State capacity and political regime stability
Andersen, D. D. E., Møller, J. Ø., Rørbæk, L. L., & Skaaning, S. (2014) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.960204 · Cited by 139
Making It Personal: Regime Type and Nuclear Proliferation
Way, C. R., & WEEKS, J. L. P. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12080 · Cited by 133
Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space
Hyde, S., & Saunders, E. N. (2020) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818319000365 · Cited by 134
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Cheibub, Gandhi, and Vreeland 2009; Geddes 1999; Lindberg et al. 2014. space, underscore that new and better measures of political institutions are not enough to assess democratic or autocratic distinctiveness on a given IR dependent variable.”
BackgroundInfluential(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519 · Cited by 154
Albertus, M., Fenner, S., & Slater, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108644334 · Cited by 136
Formal Institutions and Subjective Well-Being: Revisiting the Cross-Country Evidence
Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008) · Econstor (Econstor) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005626337 · Cited by 129
“In addition to the standard analysis we therefore perform the following simple three-step test: 1) we first follow Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) in calculating the residuals of regressing the eight indicators on (log) GDP per capita, thereby taking out most joint variation due to economic…”
Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Regime
Gilligan, M. (2006) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818306060310 · Cited by 127
Solingen, E. (2007) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055407070487 · Cited by 136
Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-OffPreprint
Egorov, G., & Сонин, К. И. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.630503 · Cited by 130
Covenants Without the Sword International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War
Valentino, B. A., Huth, P., & Croco, S. E. (2006) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2007.0004 · Cited by 130
War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of Legislators
Gartner, S. S., Segura, G. M., & Barratt, B. (2004) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290405700311 · Cited by 129
The Personal Vote and the Efficacy of Education Spending
Hicken, A. D., & Simmons, J. W. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00302.x · Cited by 127
“Alternatively, where politicians have very narrow constituencies, they tend to pursue goods and services that can be targeted to smaller groups (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2004; Cox and McCubbins 2001; Franzese, Nooruddin, and Long-Jusko 2004; Lake and Baum 2001; Olson 2000; Stasavage 2005).”
BackgroundChapter 27 The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions
Kaempfer, W. H., & Lowenberg, A. D. (2007) · Handbook of defense economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0013(06)02027-8 · Cited by 170
The Origins of Dominant Parties
Reuter, O. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316761649 · Cited by 129
Democracy, Technology, and Growth
Aghion, P., Alesina, A., & Trebbi, F. (2007) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w13180 · Cited by 148
Constrained Concessions: Beneficent Dictatorial Responses to the Domestic Political Opposition1
Conrad, C. R. (2011) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00683.x · Cited by 126
Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation: Do Democracies Spend Less?
Fordham, B. O., & Walker, T. C. (2005) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00338.x · Cited by 126
“…the behavior of democracies underscores what is obvious to anyone familiar with the history of 19th century imperialism: having a democratic regime does not rule out such aggressive policy choices (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 1999:801; Reiter and Stam, 2002:144– 163; Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003).”
BackgroundOvercoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-Lived Conflict Settlements
Gartner, S. S., & Bercovitch, J. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00427.x · Cited by 127
Political Risk, Reputation, and the Resource Curse
Jensen, N. M., & Johnston, N. P. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414011401208 · Cited by 123
Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China
Malesky, E. J., Abrami, R. M., & Zheng, Y. (2011) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041511796301579 · Cited by 117
DeMeritt, J. H. R. (2014) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002713515406 · Cited by 129
“Money is a private good and is distributed only to members of the government’s winning coalition (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003).”
BackgroundPetro Rents, Political Institutions, and Hidden Wealth: Evidence from Offshore Bank Accounts
Andersen, J. J., Johannesen, N., Lassen, D. D., & Paltseva, E. S. (2017) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvw019 · Cited by 124
“For 1E.g., Persson and Tabellini (2000), Besley and Persson (2011), Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) and Acemoglu, Robinson and Verdier (2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-08-28
- Volume
- 1
- OpenAlex
- W1535643370
- Cited by
- 4,217
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 147 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 257 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 262 · 2019: 312 · 2018: 234 · 2017: 218 · 2016: 253 · 2015: 268 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 243 · 2012: 218
- FWCI
- 70.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Keywords
- political survival, leadership selection, political institutions, resource allocation, public policy incentives, war and politics, economic development, political economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review