The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Logic of Political Survival
Abstract
The authors of this ambitious book address a fundamental political question: why are leaders who produce peace and prosperity turned out of office while those who preside over corruption, war, and misery endure? Considering this political puzzle, they also answer the related economic question of why some countries experience successful economic development and others do not. The authors construct a provocative theory on the selection of leaders and present specific formal models from which their central claims can be deduced. They show how political leaders allocate resources and how institutions for selecting leaders create incentives for leaders to pursue good and bad public policy. They also extend the model to explain the consequences of war on political survival. Throughout the book, they provide illustrations from history, ranging from ancient Sparta to Vichy France, and test the model against statistics gathered from cross-national data. The authors explain the political intuition underlying their theory in nontechnical language, reserving formal proofs for chapter appendixes. They conclude by presenting policy prescriptions based on what has been demonstrated theoretically and empirically.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) argue that public spending can be used to 'buy' allegiance and thus reduce the risk that the people will support challengers to the ruling elite.”
From The Ba'athist blackout? Selective goods provision and political violence in the Syrian civil war (2015) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003)
In the citing paper
“In democratic countries, politicians ' fate is ultimately determined in electoral competition between parties or candidates.”
From Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state capacity, and COVID-19-related school closures around the world (2022) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“In autocratic countries, by contrast, political leaders ' survival in office is dependent on ensuring the support of a much smaller coalition”
From Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state capacity, and COVID-19-related school closures around the world (2022) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“In a political system characterized by a small winning coalition and a large selectorate, members of the winning coalitions have fewer incentives to defect and join opposition groups; thus, leaders prefer to distribute private goods over public ones.”
From Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political institutions and state capacity (2023) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“Bueno de Mesquita et al . (2003) demonstrate that autocrats ' decisions on the distribution of public and private goods depend on the size of the ruling coalition -the segment of the population that supports the leader -relative to the size of the selectorate”
From Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political institutions and state capacity (2023) · cites this paper as Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,004
Authoritarian Responses to Foreign Pressure
Escribà‐Folch, A. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414011427883 · Cited by 124
“Such a bargain is based on the delivery of different types of goods to elites and citizens depending on how great the need for loyalty is (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003), as well as on the granting of policy concessions (Gibson and Hoffman, 2002). The size of the support coalition is said to depend on the availabilit…”
Improving Climate Change Mitigation Analysis: A Framework for Examining Feasibility
Nielsen, K. S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. M., Gilligan, J. M., van Vuuren, D. P., Figueroa, M. J., Folke, C., Gwozdz, W., Ivanova, D., Reisch, L. A., et al. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.007 · Cited by 141
Koubi, V., Spilker, G., Schaffer, L., & Böhmelt, T. (2016) · Population and Environment · doi:10.1007/s11111-016-0258-7 · Cited by 125
“…countries should experience less environmental migration as democratic leaders have the incentive to provide economic support, infrastructure, and social services to their citizenry for alleviating environmental hardship as a means to survive in office (e.g., Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003).”
BackgroundDasgupta, S., & Cian, E. D. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.023 · Cited by 129
Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible
Fesenfeld, L., Wicki, M., Sun, Y., & Bernauer, T. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0047-4 · Cited by 120
Bear Any Burden? How Democracies Minimize the Costs of War
Valentino, B. A., Huth, P. K., & Croco, S. E. (2010) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609990831 · Cited by 125
Dictators as Founding Fathers? The Role of Constitutions Under Autocracy
Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2012) · Economics and Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0343.2012.00402.x · Cited by 128
Internal Government Assessments of the Quality of Governance in China
Dimitrov, M. K. (2015) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-014-9170-2 · Cited by 120
Gender in the time of COVID-19: Evaluating national leadership and COVID-19 fatalities
Windsor, L., Reinhardt, G. Y., Windsor, A. J., Ostergard, R. L., Allen, S. H., Burns, C., Giger, J. T., & Wood, R. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244531 · Cited by 126
“Democracies—free countries—have an incentive to provide public goods that buffer against pandemics and other natural disasters, given that leaders whose policies fail their constituents during times of crisis face almost certain removal come re-election time [34, 35].”
BackgroundDemocracy and State Capacity: Complements or Substitutes?
Hanson, J. K. (2015) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-014-9173-z · Cited by 131
“In Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), for instance, it is not the level of democracy per se that determines the level of spending allocated to public goods but the size of the coalition on which rulers depend for remaining in power.”
Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions
McGillivray, F., & Stam, A. C. (2004) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002703262858 · Cited by 127
“The data on sanctions come from Hufbauer, Schott, and Elliot (1990); we generated the control variables using EUGene (Bennett and Stam 2000); and the leadership data come from Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003).'0 We discuss the sanctions data below in more detail.”
MethodThe Balance of Power in the Balance
Nexon, D. H. (2009) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887109000124 · Cited by 140
If You’re Against Them You’re With Us
Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2012) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414011428593 · Cited by 123
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) perhaps speak most directly to the issue at hand: They address the challenge that leaders face in buying loyalty when their potential supporters fear that they may not be in future winning coalitions.”
Gehlbach, S. G., & Keefer, P. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1080169 · Cited by 121
“This emphasis echoes Bueno de Mesquita and Root (2000), Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), Haber (2006), Besley and Kudamatsu (2007), and Padró i Miquel (2007), who analyze the choices of an autocrat potentially constrained by a ‘‘selectorate’’ whose capacity for collective action is assumed.”
BackgroundV-Dem Dataset v11.1Preprint
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3831905 · Cited by 121
Tolstrup, J. (2014) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12079 · Cited by 131
Democratization and Foreign Direct Investment Liberalization, 1970-2000
Pandya, S. S. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12125 · Cited by 118
Coup risk, coup-proofing and leader survival
Sudduth, J. K. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316676885 · Cited by 123
Wright, J. (2007) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414007308538 · Cited by 123
Labor rights and multinational production
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5788 · Cited by 116
Joshi, M., & Quinn, J. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000381 · Cited by 122
National climate policies in international comparison: The Climate Change Cooperation Index
Bernauer, T., & Böhmelt, T. (2012) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.007 · Cited by 115
“The fundamental reasoning is that democratic governments need to provide more benefits via public goods, including environmental ones, to a relatively large (compared to nondemocracies) part of the electorate in order to survive politically (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Downs, 1957).”
BackgroundElites in the Making and Breaking of Foreign Policy
Saunders, E. N. (2021) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-103330 · Cited by 129
Gibler, D. M., & Wolford, S. (2006) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002705281360 · Cited by 116
“Note that this argument reverses the causal connection between democracy and conflict identified by several authors (Mitchell and Prins 1999; Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003). Rather than joint democracy leading to peaceful resolution of disputes, we argue that the processes generating democracy also remove the hardest…”
BackgroundWarren, T. C. (2015) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343314558102 · Cited by 119
Slantchev, B. L. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081831000010x · Cited by 109
Legitimacy and Institutional Change
Gilley, B. (2007) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414007308020 · Cited by 115
Public Opinion and Foreign Aid Cuts in Economic Crises
Heinrich, T., Kobayashi, Y., & Bryant, K. A. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.005 · Cited by 114
Outside-In: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization
Gibler, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002710370135 · Cited by 118
“Indeed, nondemocratic elites benefit greatly from the private goods networks enforced by the leader (see e.g., Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003), and outside threats to these private goods networks are likely to be resisted at all costs.”
BackgroundInfluentialBodea, C. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818310000111 · Cited by 110
Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: a multilevel approach
Weymouth, S. J. (2012) · Business and Politics · doi:10.1515/bap-2012-0030 · Cited by 114
“First, consider the process of democratization as an expansion of the selectorate, or the portion of the population that participates in choosing the political leadership (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003).”
BackgroundZiblatt, D. F. (2008) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-008-9031-y · Cited by 108
The Impact of Regime Type on Health: Does Redistribution Explain Everything?
Wigley, S., & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2011) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887111000177 · Cited by 110
Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity—Conflict Nexus
Schneider, G., & Wiesehomeier, N. (2008) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343307087176 · Cited by 111
“A growing size of these groups increases economic efficiency and also renders governments more timid towards the usage of political violence (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003). Golder (2005) additionally reports that some autocracies have become more stable following non-competitive elections.”
Sources of Corruption in Authoritarian Regimes
Chang, E. C. C., & Golden, M. A. (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00678.x · Cited by 120
“Selectorate theory, developed by Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), lends some rigor to the idea that rates of corruption differ systematically across types of authoritarian regimes.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHuman Rights, NGO Shaming and the Exports of Abusive States
Peterson, T., Murdie, A., & Asal, V. (2016) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123416000065 · Cited by 60
“39 Barry, Clay and Flynn 2013; Blanton and Blanton 2007a. 40 Blanton and Blanton 2007b. 41 Blanton and Blanton 2007b. 42 Davenport 1995; Gurr 1986; Poe, Tate and Keith 1999; see also Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
BackgroundBates, R. H. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.132017 · Cited by 116
Weapons of the Powerful: Authoritarian Elite Competition and Politicized Anticorruption in China
Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016672234 · Cited by 112
“In addition, extant literature offers many explanations for why dictators tolerate corruption (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Shirk, 1993) but provides limited insights into the conditions under which autocrats choose to prosecute those involved.”
BackgroundLegislative Bargaining with Reconsideration
Diermeier, D. A., & Fong, P. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr016 · Cited by 107
Domestic Politics and International Relations
de Mesquita, B. B. (2002) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00220 · Cited by 108
Self-citationThe Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions
Brummer, K., & Thies, C. G. (2014) · Foreign Policy Analysis · doi:10.1111/fpa.12045 · Cited by 108
Ruthless Rulers: Coalition Size and the Severity of Civil Conflict
Heger, L. L., & Salehyan, I. (2007) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00456.x · Cited by 110
“In Model 2, we use the winning coalition size variable from Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) in place of our group size variable to check the 16 If more than one rebel group is listed during the civil war, we include data on the strongest of the groups.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDictatorial Institutions and their Impact on Economic Growth
Gandhi, J. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975608000015 · Cited by 107
Pain, pressure and political cover: Explaining mediation incidence
Beardsley, K. C. (2010) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343309356384 · Cited by 106
“…from other work that has argued that democracies tend to be more selective in their choice of conflicts and tend to fight harder in the ones they do enter, because they are more easily sanctioned for losing (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 1999, 2003; Chiozza & Goemans, 2003; Reiter & Stam, 2003, 1998).”
BackgroundV-Dem Codebook V10Preprint
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M. H., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A. D., et al. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3557877 · Cited by 107
The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes
Bove, V., & Brauner, J. (2014) · Defence and Peace Economics · doi:10.1080/10242694.2014.925325 · Cited by 109
“This argument was fleshed out by Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2005) and Haber (2006), who identify the so-called selectorate or launching organisations as the key to a dictator’s survival.”
BackgroundDemocracy, Dictatorship and Protection of Property Rights
Knutsen, C. H. (2011) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2010.506919 · Cited by 109
“These two cases are not exceptional (see, for example, Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003; Meredith, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialAre bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution
Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2012) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9916-1 · Cited by 107
“Political system: polity Many authors (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Lake and Baum 2001; McGuire and Olson 1996; Niskanen 1997) have argued that nondemocratic regimes are likely to underprovide public goods, including environmental quality. The logic is as follows. Nondemocratic regimes typically are ruled by small e…”
BackgroundInternational demands for austerity: Examining the impact of the IMF on the public sector
Rickard, S. J., & Caraway, T. L. (2018) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-017-9295-y · Cited by 110
“…public sector, since ruling regimes typically rely on a small coalition of loyal supporters—not a plurality of voters—for political survival (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003), and public sector jobs are a particularly effective means to such purchase support (Lust-Okar 2006; Greene 2007; Magaloni…”
BackgroundJoining the Club: Accession to the GATT/WTO
Davis, C. L., & Wilf, M. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/691058 · Cited by 105
Aksoy, D., Carter, D. B., & Wright, J. (2012) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381612000400 · Cited by 109
“7Selectorate theory does not account for political parties in autocracies (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003, 34).”
BackgroundOpenness, Uncertainty, and Social Spending: Implications for the Globalization- Welfare State Debate
Nooruddin, I., & Simmons, J. W. (2009) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00558.x · Cited by 102
“Second, the constituency size argument, developed by Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003), argues that the size of the winning coalition relative to the size of the selectorate is a relevant variable for understanding government policy.”
BackgroundDomestic-Level Diversionary Theory of War
Tir, J., & Jasinski, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002708318565 · Cited by 105
Peksen, D., & Drury, A. C. (2009) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-009-0126-2 · Cited by 105
Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human Rights
Cingranelli, D. L., & Георгиевич, Ф. М. (2010) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609990594 · Cited by 102
“The analysis of famines by Plümper and Neumayer (2009) is closely related to the theory of political survival developed by Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) who ponder why politicians responsible for ‘‘bad’’ policies survive in office.”
MethodWho Controls Foreign Aid? Elite versus Public Perceptions of Donor Influence in Aid-Dependent Uganda
Findley, M. G., Harris, A. S., Milner, H. V., & Nielson, D. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818317000273 · Cited by 101
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
Political Selection and Persistence of Bad Governments
Acemoğlu, D., Egorov, G., & Сонин, К. И. (2010) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1511 · Cited by 103
The Causes and Consequences of Development Clusters: State Capacity, Peace, and Income*
Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2014) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041128 · Cited by 104
More Inequality, More Killings: The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal
Nepal, M., Bohara, A. K., & Gawande, K. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00529.x · Cited by 109
Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy
Chapman, T. L. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990154 · Cited by 102
Bluhm, R., Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B. C., Strange, A. M., & Tierney, M. J. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3262101 · Cited by 105
Four Worlds of Welfare: Understanding Subnational Variation in Chinese Social Health Insurance
Huang, X. L. (2015) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0305741015000399 · Cited by 103
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Haber 2007; Gandhi 2008; Wintrobe 1998.”
BackgroundNot by the Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty
Warren, T. C. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000350 · Cited by 111
“Let us define political power quite simply as the capacity to influence the actions of others; that is, the capacity to produce behaviors in others that would not otherwise have been 13 Azam 1995; 2001; Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Buhaug 2006; Gandhi and Przeworski 2006.”
BackgroundLiving by the Sword and Dying by the Sword? Leadership Transitions in and out of Dictatorships
Debs, A. (2016) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqv014 · Cited by 98
“If it is weak, the incumbent’s tenure is short.8 The theory also claims that the weaker is the ‘loyalty norm’ for an incumbent, the lower is the likelihood that he is eliminated upon ouster (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003, 343).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDo Democracies Provide Better Education? Revisiting the Democracy–Human Capital Link
Dahlum, S., & Knutsen, C. H. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.001 · Cited by 114
From protection to persecution: Threat environment and refugee scapegoating
Savun, B., & Gineste, C. (2018) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343318811432 · Cited by 100
The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council: Money and Influence
Vreeland, J. R., & Dreher, A. (2014) · Cited by 101
Autocracies and Terrorism: Conditioning Effects of Authoritarian Regime Type on Terrorist Attacks
Wilson, M. C., & Piazza, J. A. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12028 · Cited by 101
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003) demonstrate that the size of the winning coalition relative to the selectorate must be sufficiently large for the leader to choose to distribute goods publicly rather than privately.”
BackgroundThe Agency Problem Underlying Repression
Tyson, S. A. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/698887 · Cited by 100
Violence and the Rise of Open-Access Orders
North, D. C., WALLIS, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009) · Journal of democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.0.0060 · Cited by 100
Pre-electoral commitments and government formation
Debus, M. (2008) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9338-2 · Cited by 98
“Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003).”
Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability
Voeten, E., & Brewer, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002706291054 · Cited by 100
“…UNIV LIBRARY on February 6, 2015jcr.sagepub.comDownloaded from conception of democratic accountability than one based solely on voters’ use of elections to reward incumbents for triumphant wars and punish them for unsuccessful military adventures (e.g., Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Gaubatz 1999).”
BackgroundIs There a Democracy–Civil Society Paradox in Global Environmental Governance?
Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T., & Koubi, V. (2012) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00155 · Cited by 100
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003; Downs 1957.”
BackgroundCountry or leader? Political change and UN General Assembly voting
Dreher, A., & Jensen, N. M. (2012) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.10.002 · Cited by 108
Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections
Trounstine, J. L. (2012) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/1078087412463536 · Cited by 99
“When the costs of voting are high, the median voter may have preferences that differ substantially from the median resident (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003). As explained above, in low-turnout environments, those who stand to benefit the most from election outcomes are likely to make up a larger share of the electorate…”
BackgroundEffective Foreign Aid Following Civil War: The Nonstrategic‐Desperation Hypothesis
Girod, D. M. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00552.x · Cited by 97
Decision Making in Autocratic Regimes: A Poliheuristic Perspective
Kinne, B. J. (2005) · International Studies Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00197.x · Cited by 96
The Global Spread of Environmental Ministries: Domestic-International Interactions
Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12119 · Cited by 98
Squeaky Wheels and Troop Loyalty
Johnson, J., & Thyne, C. (2018) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002716654742 · Cited by 76
The Political Economy of the Natural Resource Curse: A Survey of Theory and Evidence
Deacon, R. T. T. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics · doi:10.1561/0700000042 · Cited by 100
The Costs of Favoritism: Is Politically Driven Aid Less Effective?
Dreher, A., Klasen, S., Vreeland, J. R., et al. (2013) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/671711 · Cited by 98
“Following many other studies ðe.g., Easterly and Levine 1997; Dollar and Svensson 2000; Broz 2002; Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003Þ, we include the number of government crises as a measure of instability.”
BackgroundGibler, D. M., & Tir, J. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00473.x · Cited by 98
A political economy of human rights: Oil, natural gas, and state incentives to repress 1
DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Young, J. K. (2013) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894212473915 · Cited by 97
“Instead, they can buy allegiance from the military or some other privileged group to maintain power.8 Institutions that affect the size of this winning coalition determine economic growth, war and many other important political outcomes (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGreat Powers, Hierarchy, and Endogenous Regimes: Rethinking the Domestic Causes of Peace
McDonald, P. J. (2015) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818315000120 · Cited by 97
“Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
Political Investment: Remittances and Elections
O’Mahony, A. (2012) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123412000737 · Cited by 97
Autocratic Legislatures and Expropriation Risk
Wilson, M. C., & Wright, J. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000149 · Cited by 96
“Pointing to lower values of a property rights index in countries that have multiple parties in the legislature, they show that autocratic legislatures are associated with 8 Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003.”
BackgroundTerrorism, Democracy, and Credible Commitments1
Findley, M. G., & Young, J. K. (2011) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00647.x · Cited by 99
“Under the authoritarian basis for order, the state has limited support from society and draws on a much smaller winning coalition (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003). Because of their limited constituency, they cannot credibly restrict themselves from violating the rights of a large segment of society. Lijphart (1999) off…”
BackgroundThe Social Contract Revisited: Evidence from Communist and State Capitalist Economies
Cook, L. J., & Dimitrov, M. K. (2017) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2016.1267714 · Cited by 97
“…regimes, which excluded the possibility that the leadership may take popular opinion seriously (Arendt 1951; Friedrich & Brzezinski 1965; Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003), our essay joins a growing group of scholars who have provided detailed evidence that communist leaders catered to the…”
BackgroundMeasuring the Consolidation of Power in Nondemocracies
Gandhi, J., & Sumner, J. L. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/708683 · Cited by 96
Political competition, electoral participation and public finance in 20th century Latin America
Aidt, T. S., & Eterovic, D. S. (2010) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.06.006 · Cited by 100
Power-Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian RegimesPreprint
Svolik, M. W. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.860744 · Cited by 96
Power Tool or Dull Blade? Selectorate Theory for Autocracies
Gallagher, M. E., & Hanson, J. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-071213-041224 · Cited by 100
“In general, the idea that rulers who are accountable to broad constituencies in the polity have stronger incentives to perform well is appealing, and the application of this logic to democratic peace theory (Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1999) has been valuable.”
BackgroundSocial services to claim legitimacy: comparing autocracies’ performance
Cassani, A. (2017) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1304321 · Cited by 101
The Enforcement Problem in Coercive Bargaining: Interstate Conflict over Rebel Support in Civil Wars
Schultz, K. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818310000032 · Cited by 97
Policy Experiments, Democratic Ownership and Development Assistance
Faust, J. (2010) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00496.x · Cited by 94
The Effect of Authorita rian Regime Type on Exchange Rate Policy
Steinberg, D. A., & Malhotra, K. (2014) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887114000136 · Cited by 88
Cooperation, Conflict, and the Costs of Anarchy
Fearon, J. D. (2018) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818318000115 · Cited by 107
“See Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003, chap.”
BackgroundDominant Party Rule, Elections, and Cabinet Instability in African Autocracies
Kroeger, A. M. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000497 · Cited by 95
“37 Bueno de Mesquita et al. 2003. systems have access to substantial private resources, they are discouraged from using those resources to challenge the incumbent because the likelihood of successfully challenging the leader and being included in a subsequent small coalition system is small.”
BackgroundInfluentialChwieroth, J. M., & Walter, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316649992 · Cited by 99
Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy
Victor, D., Lumkowsky, M., & Dannenberg, A. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01454-x · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-08-28
- Volume
- 1
- OpenAlex
- W1535643370
- Cited by
- 4,217
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 147 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 257 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 262 · 2019: 312 · 2018: 234 · 2017: 218 · 2016: 253 · 2015: 268 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 243 · 2012: 218
- FWCI
- 70.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Keywords
- political survival, leadership selection, political institutions, resource allocation, public policy incentives, war and politics, economic development, political economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review