The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive Critics and the Basal Ganglia
Abstract
One of the most active areas of research in artificial intelligence is the study of learning methods by which “embedded agents ” can improve performance while acting in complex dynamic environments. An agent, or decision maker, is embedded in an environment when it receives information from, and acts on, that environment in an ongoing closed-loop interaction. An embedded agent has to make decisions under time pressure and uncertainty and has to learn without the help of an ever-present knowledgeable teacher. Although the novelty of this emphasis may be inconspicuous to a biologist, animals being the prototypical embedded agents, this emphasis is a significant departure from the more traditional focus in artificial intelligence on reasoning within circumscribed domains removed from the flow of real-world events. One consequence of the embedded agent view is the increasing interest in the learning paradigm called reinforcement learning (RL). Unlike the more widely studied supervised learning systems, which learn from a set of examples of correct input/output behavior, RL systems adjust their behavior with the goal of maximizing the frequency and/or magnitude of the reinforcing events they encounter over time. While the core ideas of modern RL come from theories of animal classical and instrumental
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences
Sutton, R. S. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00115009 · Cited by 5,148
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Self-citation
Cited by
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Getting formal with dopamine and reward
Schultz, W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 · Cited by 2,574
Balleine, B. W., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.131 · Cited by 1,775
Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors
Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027 · Cited by 1,779
Neuronal Coding of Prediction Errors
Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.473 · Cited by 1,427
Tonic dopamine: Opportunity costs and the control of response vigor
Niv, Y., Daw, N. D., Joel, D., & Dayan, P. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4 · Cited by 1,133
Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control
Doya, K. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00153-7 · Cited by 964
Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model
FRANK, M. J., LOUGHRY, B., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2001) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.1.2.137 · Cited by 879
Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum
DELGADO, M. R. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1390.002 · Cited by 736
Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game
Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1575 · Cited by 729
Metalearning and neuromodulation
Doya, K. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00044-8 · Cited by 704
Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement learning perspective
Botvinick, M. M., Niv, Y., & Barto, A. G. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.011 · Cited by 646
Self-citationDecision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain
Dayan, P., & Daw, N. D. (2008) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.8.4.429 · Cited by 580
Nieuwenhuis, S., Holroyd, C. B., Mol, N., & Coles, M. G. H. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.05.003 · Cited by 557
Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action
Morris, G., Nevet, A., Arkadir, D., Vaadia, E., & Bergman, H. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1743 · Cited by 503
Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin
Boureau, Y.-L., & Dayan, P. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.151 · Cited by 456
Opponent appetitive-aversive neural processes underlie predictive learning of pain relief
Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Koltzenburg, M., Wiech, K., Frackowiak, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1527 · Cited by 439
Pan, W.-X., Schmidt, R., Wickens, J. R., & Hyland, B. I. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1478-05.2005 · Cited by 429
Neural prediction errors reveal a risk-sensitive reinforcement-learning process in the human brain
Niv, Y., Edlund, J. A., Dayan, P., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5498-10.2012 · Cited by 356
Barto, A., Mirolli, M., & Baldassarre, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00907 · Cited by 397
“…basis of a model of classical conditioning that elaborates the Rescorla-Wagner model (Sutton and Barto, 1990) as well as the reward-prediction-error hypothesis about the phasic activity of dopamine producing neurons in the brain (Barto, 1995; Houk et al., 1995; Schultz et al., 1997; Schultz, 1998).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning task-state representations
Niv, Y. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0470-8 · Cited by 356
Basal ganglia orient eyes to reward
Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., & Nakahara, H. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00458.2005 · Cited by 377
Serotonin in Affective Control
Dayan, P., & Huys, Q. J. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135607 · Cited by 381
The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning
Doll, B. B., Simon, D. A., & Daw, N. D. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.003 · Cited by 380
Reinforcement Learning in Multidimensional Environments Relies on Attention Mechanisms
Niv, Y., Daniel, R., Geana, A., Gershman, S. J., Leong, Y. C., Radulescu, A., & Wilson, R. C. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2978-14.2015 · Cited by 362
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., Johnson, A., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.784 · Cited by 346
Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning
San Martín, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00304 · Cited by 354
Model-based and model-free Pavlovian reward learning: Revaluation, revision, and revelation
Dayan, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0277-8 · Cited by 357
Dunsmoor, J. E., Niv, Y., Daw, N., & Phelps, E. A. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.028 · Cited by 329
Foti, D., & Hajcak, G. (2009) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.12.004 · Cited by 341
Mapping value based planning and extensively trained choice in the human brain
Wunderlich, K., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3068 · Cited by 310
Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account
Liljeholm, M., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.007 · Cited by 317
Correlated Coding of Motivation and Outcome of Decision by Dopamine Neurons
Satoh, T., Nakai, S., Sato, T., & Kimura, M. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-30-09913.2003 · Cited by 298
The hippocampal-striatal axis in learning, prediction and goal-directed behavior
Pennartz, C. M. A., Ito, R., Verschure, P. F. M. J., Battaglia, F. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.001 · Cited by 287
Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement
Cardinal, R. N. (2006) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.004 · Cited by 248
Kim, S., Stephenson, M. C., Morris, P. G., & Jackson, S. R. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.070 · Cited by 227
Human neural learning depends on reward prediction errors in the blocking paradigm.
Tobler, P. N., O’Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00762.2005 · Cited by 209
Wörgötter, F., & Porr, B. (2005) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/0899766053011555 · Cited by 203
Twenty-Five Lessons from Computational Neuromodulation
Dayan, P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.027 · Cited by 190
Reward-related processing in the human brain: developmental considerations
Fareri, D. S., Martin, L. N., & Delgado, M. R. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000576 · Cited by 141
The why, what, where, when and how of goal-directed choice: neuronal and computational principles
Verschure, P. F. M. J., Pennartz, C. M. A., & Pezzulo, G. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0483 · Cited by 131
Xiao, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, M., Li, H., Tang, Y., Wang, Y., Fan, Q., & Fromson, J. A. (2011) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.11.022 · Cited by 127
Functional neuroimaging of intertemporal choice models: a review
Carter, R. M., Meyer, J. R., & Huettel, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0018046 · Cited by 124
Reinforcement learning: Computational theory and biological mechanisms
Doya, K. (2007) · HFSP journal · doi:10.2976/1.2732246 · Cited by 150
Goal-directed control and its antipodes
Dayan, P. (2009) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.004 · Cited by 93
Passarotti, A. M., & Pavuluri, M. N. (2011) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.11.71 · Cited by 44
State-dependent value representation: evidence from the striatum
Burke, C. J., Dreher, J.-C., Seymour, B., & Tobler, P. N. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00193 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Barto, A. G.
- Venue
- Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1994-11-07
- Pages
- 215-232
- OpenAlex
- W2153562927
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.