CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,107Frailty in Older AdultsCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Factors for 5-Year Mortality in Older Adults<SUBTITLE>The Cardiovascular Health Study</SUBTITLE>

Fried, Linda P.·1998·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.279.8.585
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Multiple factors contribute to mortality in older adults, but the extent to which subclinical disease and other factors contribute independently to mortality risk is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the disease, functional, and personal characteristics that jointly predict mortality in community-dwelling men and women aged 65 years or older. DESIGN: Prospective population-based cohort study with 5 years of follow-up and a validation cohort of African Americans with 4.25-year follow-up. SETTING: Four US communities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5201 and 685 men and women aged 65 years or older in the original and African American cohorts, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year mortality. RESULTS: In the main cohort, 646 deaths (12%) occurred within 5 years. Using Cox proportional hazards models, 20 characteristics (of 78 assessed) were each significantly (P<.05) and independently associated with mortality: increasing age, male sex, income less than $50000 per year, low weight, lack of moderate or vigorous exercise, smoking for more than 50 pack-years, high brachial (>169 mm Hg) and low tibial (< or = 127 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure, diuretic use by those without hypertension or congestive heart failure, elevated fasting glucose level (>7.2 mmol/L [130 mg/dL]), low albumin level (< or = 37 g/L), elevated creatinine level (> or = 106 micromol/L [1.2 mg/dL]), low forced vital capacity (< or = 2.06 mL), aortic stenosis (moderate or severe) and abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (by echocardiography), major electrocardiographic abnormality, stenosis of internal carotid artery (by ultrasound), congestive heart failure, difficulty in any instrumental activity of daily living, and low cognitive function by Digit Symbol Substitution test score. Neither high-density lipoprotein cholesterol nor low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with mortality. After adjustment for other factors, the association between age and mortality diminished, but the reduction in mortality with female sex persisted. Finally, the risk of mortality was validated in the second cohort; quintiles of risk ranged from 2% to 39% and 0% to 26% for the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Objective measures of subclinical disease and disease severity were independent and joint predictors of 5-year mortality in older adults, along with male sex, relative poverty, physical activity, smoking, indicators of frailty, and disability. Except for history of congestive heart failure, objective, quantitative measures of disease were better predictors of mortality than was clinical history of disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.279.8.585

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fried, L. P.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Fried, Linda P.
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1998-02-25
Volume
279
Issue
8
Pages
585
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.279.8.585
OpenAlex
W2039427748
Cited by
1,107
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 53
FWCI
22.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-87081, N01-HC-87079, N01-HC-87080)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
older adults, mortality risk factors, subclinical disease, cardiovascular risk, functional status, activities of daily living, cognitive function, blood pressure, albumin, creatinine, aortic stenosis, congestive heart failure, carotid artery stenosis, smoking, low income, African Americans, sex differences, risk prediction model, Cardiovascular Health Study, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review