Cited by 618Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Prevalence and Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: Part 1

Open access
Lopez, Oscar L., Jagust, William J., DeKosky, Steven T., Becker, James T., Fitzpatrick, Annette, Dulberg, Corinne, Breitner, John, Lyketsos, Constantine +4 more·2003·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its diagnostic classification in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) Cognition Study. DESIGN: The CHS Cognition Study is an ancillary study of the CHS that was conducted to determine the presence of MCI and dementia in the CHS cohort. SETTING: Multicenter population study. PATIENTS: We examined 3608 participants in the CHS who had undergone detailed neurological, neuropsychological, neuroradiological, and psychiatric testing to identify dementia and MCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of MCI was determined for the whole cohort, and specific subtypes of MCI were examined in detail only at the Pittsburgh, Pa, center (n = 927). Mild cognitive impairment was classified as either MCI amnestic-type or MCI multiple cognitive deficits-type. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of MCI was 19% (465 of 2470 participants); prevalence increased with age from 19% in participants younger than 75 years to 29% in those older than 85 years. The overall prevalence of MCI at the Pittsburgh center was 22% (130 of 599 participants); prevalence of the MCI amnesic-type was 6% and of the MCI multiple cognitive deficits-type was 16%. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-two percent of the participants aged 75 years or older had MCI. Mild cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous syndrome, where the MCI amnestic-type is less frequent than the MCI multiple cognitive deficits-type. Most of the participants with MCI had comorbid conditions that may affect their cognitive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.60.10.1385

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on studies that show clinical AD, MCI, and preclinical AD are common in the elderly, by the new scheme the vast majority of those past the age of 85 have AD.

    “Based on studies that show clinical AD [6, 8], MCI [88], and preclinical AD [67] are common in the elderly, by this scheme that vast majority of those past the age of 85 have AD (Figure 2).”

    From Brain aging, Alzheimer's disease, and mitochondria (2011) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez, O. L., Jagust, W. J., DeKosky, S. T., Becker, J. T., Fitzpatrick, A., Dulberg, C., Breitner, J., Lyketsos, C., Jones, B., Kawas, C., Carlson, M., & Kuller, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
1385
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114624908
Cited by
618
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 49
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01hc085079-024, n01hc015103-009, n01hc085084-005, n01hc085085-011, n01hc085083-027, n01hc085080-026, n01hc085086-022, n01hc035129-010, N01HC85086, N01HC85079, N01HC-35129)
  • University of California, Davis
  • Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Institute on Aging (N01HC85079, N01 HC‐15103, AG 20098, AG-15928, N01‐HC‐35129, N01‐HC‐85086, R01AG015928)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85085, N01HC-85083, N01HC15103, N01HC85082, N01 HC85086, N01HC85080, N01-HC-85079 through N01-HC-85086, N01-HC85079, ­N01-HC85084, N01HC35129)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, K02MH001077, N01-HC-85079, K02-MH-01077)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, prevalence, MCI classification, amnestic MCI, dementia, Cardiovascular Health Study, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Pennsylvania, Population, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review