Cited by 330Physical Activity and HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Exercise for depression

Rimer, Jane, Dwan, Kerry, Lawlor, Debbie A, Greig, Carolyn A, McMurdo, Marion, Morley, Wendy, Mead, Gillian E·2012·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Depression is a common and important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Depression is commonly treated with antidepressants and/or psychotherapy, but some people may prefer alternative approaches such as exercise. There are a number of theoretical reasons why exercise may improve depression. This is an update of an earlier review first published in 2009. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of exercise in the treatment of depression. Our secondary outcomes included drop-outs from exercise and control groups, costs, quality of life and adverse events. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis (CCDAN) Review Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sports Discus and PsycINFO for eligible studies (to February 2010). We also searched www.controlled-trials.com in November 2010. The CCDAN Group searched its Specialised Register in June 2011 and potentially eligible trials were listed as 'awaiting assessment'. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials in which exercise was compared to standard treatment, no treatment or a placebo treatment in adults (aged 18 and over) with depression, as defined by trial authors. We excluded trials of postnatal depression. Data collection and analysis For this update, two review authors extracted data on outcomes at the end of the trial. We used these data to calculate effect sizes for each trial using Hedges' g method and a standardised mean difference (SMD) for…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004366.pub5

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rimer, J., Dwan, K., Lawlor, D. A., Greig, C. A., McMurdo, M., Morley, W., & Mead, G. E.
Affiliations
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2012-07-11
Issue
7
Pages
CD004366-CD004366
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211229606
Cited by
330
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 10
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, depression, exercise therapy, antidepressant efficacy, adverse events, dropout, quality of life, cost-effectiveness, risk of bias, allocation concealment, intention-to-treat analysis, adults with depression, non-pharmacological treatment, depression recurrence prevention, exercise adherence, exercise duration, exercise frequency
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Humans, Middle Aged, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review