Cited by 122Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Modifications of the Quasi-Biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layer

Open access
Aquila, V., Garfinkel, C. I., Newman, P.A., Oman, L.D., Waugh, D.W.·2014·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of geoengineering via stratospheric sulfate aerosol on the quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) using the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 Chemistry Climate Model. We performed four 30 year simulations with a continuous injection of sulfur dioxide on the equator at 0° longitude. The four simulations differ by the amount of sulfur dioxide injected (5 Tg/yr and 2.5 Tg/yr) and the altitude of the injection (16 km–25 km and 22 km–25 km). We find that such an injection dramatically alters the quasi‐biennial oscillation, prolonging the phase of easterly shear with respect to the control simulation. This is caused by the increased aerosol heating and associated warming in the tropical lower stratosphere and higher residual vertical velocity. In the case of maximum perturbation, i.e., highest stratospheric aerosol burden, the lower tropical stratosphere is locked into a permanent westerly QBO phase.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013gl058818

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased sulfate concentrations could impact the phases of the quasi-biennial oscillation.

    “potentially impacting the phases of the quasi-biennial oscillation (Aquila et al 2014)”

    From The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100 (2020) · cites this paper as Aquila et al 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aquila, V., Garfinkel, C. I., Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., & Waugh, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Aquila, V.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2014-03-12
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1738-1744
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1913055161
Cited by
122
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
quasi-biennial oscillation, solar geoengineering, stratospheric sulfate aerosols, sulfur dioxide insertion, stratospheric aerosol layer, aerosol heating, tropical lower stratosphere, stratospheric circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review