Cited by 14Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatment

Partnerships for Meaningful Community Living: Rehabilitation and Recovery‐Informed Practices

Killackey, Eóin, Harvey, Carol, Amering, Michaela, Herrman, Helen·2015·Psychiatry

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of some of the approaches to recovery and rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, anxiety, depression, personality disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and other disorders can be persistent and disabling. Rehabilitation comprises key psychosocial interventions that are offered to assist people to achieve recovery, and the range of supports and adjustments that may be necessary, depending on the individual person's needs. One of the defining features of SMI in general and schizophrenia in particular is poor social functioning, which means that people with schizophrenia are more likely not to have the appropriate behaviors to facilitate social interactions. Assertive community treatment (ACT) provides flexible and intensive, home-based treatment to people with SMI who are at risk of frequent hospitalizations, and who are unable or unwilling to attend community mental health centers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118753378.ch97

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite guideline recommendations, family psychoeducation is not routinely available in mental health services in these industrialised countries.

    “Despite these recommendations, and consistent with other psychosocial interventions, FPE is not routinely available in mental health services in these countries.”
  • Family psychoeducation remains not routinely available even after targeted training and follow-up support for practitioners.

    “This holds true even after targeted training and follow-up support for practitioners have been provided (Fadden 2006b;Harvey 2013;Killackey 2015).”
  • Various family consultation models are brief, lasting 1-3 sessions, and may be provided by practitioners or family peers.

    “There are various family consultation models, all of which are brief (1-3 sessions) and may be provided by practitioners or family peers (Farhall 2012;Harvey 2013;Killackey 2015).”
  • Peer-to-peer approaches have promising but limited evidence of benefit and require further research.

    “Peer-to-peer approaches have promising, but limited, evidence of benefit and so require further research (Killackey 2015).”

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Killackey, E., Harvey, C., Amering, M., & Herrman, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-20
Pages
1959-1982
OpenAlex
W1533377679
Cited by
14
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
severe mental illness, schizophrenia, recovery, rehabilitation, community living, assertive community treatment, social functioning, psychosocial interventions, home-based therapy, community mental health services, hospitalization risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review