Cited by 332Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A life course approach to cognitive reserve: A model for cognitive aging and development?

Open access
Richards, Marcus, Deary, Ian J.·2005·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

The concept of reserve in neuroscience maintains that there are aspects of brain structure and function that can buffer the effects of neuropathology such that the greater the reserve, the more severe the pathology must be to cause functional impairment. This article provides a concise overview of structural and functional approaches to reserve and shows how reserve may be conceived as the sum of its lifetime input. In this context, reserve therefore provides an empirical yet general model of cognitive aging and development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20637

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barker DJP, 1998, Mothers, babies and health in later life

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Richards, M., & Deary, I. J.
Affiliations
The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Richards, Marcus
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-21
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
617-622
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2157174978
Cited by
331
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive reserve, life course, cognitive aging, cognitive development, neuropathology, brain structure, brain function
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aging, Cognition, Humans, Human Development, Models, Biological, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review