Cited by 142Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia

Open access
Hillis, Argye E., Beh, Yuan Ye, Sebastian, Rajani, Breining, Bonnie, Tippett, Donna C., Wright, Amy, Saxena, Sadhvi, Rorden, Chris +4 more·2018·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Many stroke patients show remarkable recovery of language after initial severe impairment, but it is difficult to predict which patients will show good recovery. We aimed to identify patient and lesion characteristics that together predict the best naming outcome in 4 studies. Methods: We report 2 longitudinal studies that identified 2 variables at onset that were strongly associated with good recovery of naming (the most common residual deficit in aphasia) in the first 6 months after stroke: damage to left posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) and/or superior longitudinal fasciculus/arcuate fasciculus (SLF/AF), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use. We then tested these variables in 2 independent cohorts of chronic left hemisphere stroke patients, using chi‐square tests and multivariate logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes and t tests for continuous outcomes. Results: Lesion load in left pSTG and SLF/AF was associated with poorer naming outcome. Preservation of these areas and use of SSRIs were associated with naming recovery, independent of lesion volume, time since stroke, and depression. Patients with damage to these critical areas showed better naming outcome if they took SSRIs for 3 months after stroke. Those with preservation of these critical areas achieved good recovery of naming regardless of SSRI use. Interpretation: Lesion load in left pSTG and SLF/AF at onset predicts later naming performance. Although based on a small number of patients, our preliminary results suggest outcome might be modulated by SSRIs, but these associations need to be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2018;83:612–622

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.25184

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hillis et al. demonstrated that the influence of lesion load on aphasia recovery may be influenced by SSRIs; for patients with superior temporal and/or SLF/AF lesions, SSRIs improved naming outcomes independent of depression, initial aphasia severity, or lesion volume.

    “Hillis et al. [38] recently demonstrated that the influence of lesion load on aphasia recovery may be influenced by SSRIs. For patients with superior temporal and/or SLF/AF lesions, the use of SSRIs improved naming outcomes, independent of the presence of depression, initial aphasia severity, or lesion volume.”

    From Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat? (2018) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Goodglass H Kaplan E Barresi B Boston disagnostic aphasia examination-third edition (BDAE-3) San Antonio Pearson 2000
  2. [44]Chollet F Tardy J Albucher J Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): A randomised placebo-controlled trial The Lancet Neurology 2011 10 2 123 130 21216670

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hillis, A. E., Beh, Y. Y., Sebastian, R., Breining, B., Tippett, D. C., Wright, A., Saxena, S., Rorden, C., Bonilha, L., Basilakos, A., Yourganov, G., & Fridriksson, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hillis, Argye E.
  • Beh, Yuan Ye
  • Sebastian, Rajani
  • Breining, Bonnie
  • Tippett, Donna C.
  • Wright, Amy
  • Saxena, Sadhvi
  • Rorden, Chris
  • Bonilha, Leonardo
  • Basilakos, Alexandra
  • Yourganov, Grigori
  • Fridriksson, Julius
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
612-622
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2791952209
Cited by
142
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01 DC05375, T32 DC014435, P50 DC014664)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
post-stroke aphasia, posterior superior temporal gyrus, superior longitudinal fasciculus, arcuate fasciculus, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, lesion load, left hemisphere stroke, chronic stroke
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Recovery of Function, Stroke, Cerebrum, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review