Cited by 130Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Exercise, cognition, and the adolescent brain

Open access
Herting, Megan M., Chu, Xiaofang·2017·Birth Defects Research

Abstract

Background: Few adolescents engage in the recommended levels of physical activity, and daily exercise levels tend to drastically decrease throughout adolescence. Beyond physical health benefits, regular exercise may also have important implications for the teenage brain and cognitive and academic capabilities. Methods: This narrative review examines how physical activity and aerobic exercise relate to school performance, cognition, and brain structure and function. Results: A number of studies have found that habitual exercise and physical activity are associated with academic performance, cognitive function, brain structure, and brain activity in adolescents. We also discuss how additional intervention studies that examine a wide range of neurological and cognitive outcomes are necessary, as well as characterizing the type, frequency, and dose of exercise and identifying individual differences that contribute to how exercise may benefit the teen brain. Conclusions: Routine exercise relates to adolescent brain structure and function as well as cognitive performance. Together, these studies suggest that physical activity and aerobic exercise may be important factors for optimal adolescent brain development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdr2.1178

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herting, M. M., & Chu, X.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Herting, Megan M.
Venue
Birth Defects Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12
Volume
109
Issue
20
Pages
1672-1679
ISSN
2472-1727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2780154522
Cited by
130
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Birth Defects Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH108761)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adolescent physical activity, aerobic exercise, adolescent brain development, cognitive function, academic performance, brain structure, brain function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Exercise, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review