Cited by 43Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Social feedback processing from early to late adolescence: influence of sex, age, and attachment style

Open access
Vrtička, Pascal, Sander, David, Anderson, Brittany, Badoud, Deborah, Eliez, Stephan, Debbané, Martin·2014·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The establishment of an accurate understanding of one's social context is a central developmental task during adolescence. A critical component of such development is to learn how to integrate the objective evaluation of one's behavior with the social response to the latter--here referred to as social feedback processing. CASE REPORT: We measured brain activity by means of fMRI in 33 healthy adolescents (12-19 years old, 14 females). Participants played a difficult perceptual game with integrated verbal and visual feedback. Verbal feedback provided the participants with objective performance evaluation (won vs. lost). Visual feedback consisted of either smiling or angry faces, representing positive or negative social evaluations. Together, the combination of verbal and visual feedback gave rise to congruent versus incongruent social feedback combinations. In addition to assessing sex differences, we further tested for the effects of age and attachment style on social feedback processing. Results revealed that brain activity during social feedback processing was significantly modulated by sex, age, and attachment style in prefrontal cortical areas, ventral anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, caudate, and amygdala/hippocampus. We found indication for heightened activity during incongruent social feedback processing in females, older participants, and individuals with an anxious attachment style. Conversely, we observed stronger activity during processing of congruent social feedback in males and participants with an avoidant attachment style. CONCLUSION: Our findings not only extend knowledge on the typical development of socio-emotional brain function during adolescence, but also provide first clues on how attachment insecurities, and particularly attachment avoidance, could interfere with the latter mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.251

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variability in studies of flexible updating may be related to aspects of study design, including the real-world motivational salience of rewards and the relative amounts of punishment and reward in the task.

    “Variability in these studies may be related to aspects of study design, including the real-world motivational salience of rewards offered (Nelson et al., 2005; Vrtička et al., 2014) and the relative amounts of punishment and reward in the task (Cohen et al., 2010; Davidson et al., 2006; van den Bos et al., 2012; van der Schaaf et al., 2011; van Duijvenvoorde et al., 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vrtička, P., Sander, D., Anderson, B., Badoud, D., Eliez, S., & Debbané, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Adolescence Clinical Psychology Research Unit Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
  • Office Médico‐Pédagogique Research Unit Department of Psychiatry University of Geneva School of Medicine Geneva Switzerland
Corresponding author
Vrtička, Pascal
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
703-720
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W2149513600
Cited by
43
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescence, attachment styles, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, sex differences, age differences, social evaluation, prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, ventral anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, social-emotional development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Internal-External Control, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review