Cited by 296Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy

Barlińska, Julia, Szuster, Anna, Winiewski, Mikołaj·2013·Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to understand how adolescents respond as bystanders of cyberbullying and to seek factors that might influence their actions. The study explored the effects of type of contact (online vs. face to face), form of violence (private vs. public), and empathy activation (affective and cognitive) on negative bystander behaviour understood as active participation in victimisation. The influence of experience of cyberbullying as perpetrator and as victim and gender on negative bystander behaviour was also controlled. Three experimental studies were conducted. The results indicate that online contact increases the likelihood of negative bystander behaviour. Private violence was less likely to elicit negative bystander action than was public violence. Previous experience of cyberperpetration was proved to increase the probability of negative bystander behaviour. Neither gender nor cybervictimisation affected the engagement in negative bystander behaviour in any of the studies. The inhibitory effect of empathy activation (both affective and cognitive) on negative bystander behaviour was demonstrated. Both types of cognitive empathy induction, emotion and behaviour focused, diminish the likelihood of negative bystander behaviour. The conclusions of the research are that negative bystander behaviour occurs more often in cyberspace than offline and that forms of intervention involving both affective and cognitive empathy may limit the negative bystander behaviour that supports cyberbullying. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/casp.2137

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital bystanders were more likely to actively engage in cyber bullying (by forwarding pictures of a classmate) than offline bullying incidents.

    “One study by Barlińska et al. (2013) found that digital bystanders were more likely to actively engage in cyber bullying (by forwarding pictures of a classmate) than offline bullying incidents.”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Barlińska et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • The Maria Grzegorzewska University (PL)
Corresponding author
Barlińska, Julia
Venue
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
37-51
ISSN
  • 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1298
OpenAlex
W1527608753
Cited by
296
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, bystander behavior, adolescents, empathy, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, cyberbullying perpetrators, cyberbullying victims, gender differences, cyberbullying intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review