The DOI matches its Crossref record; 206 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 30 of the 91 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews the foundation for a role of the human anterior insular cortex (AIC) in emotional awareness, defined as the conscious experience of emotions. We first introduce the neuroanatomical features of AIC and existing findings on emotional awareness. Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people's emotional states, as a test case, we then present evidence to demonstrate: 1) AIC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are commonly coactivated as revealed by a meta-analysis, 2) AIC is functionally dissociable from ACC, 3) AIC integrates stimulus-driven and top-down information, and 4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness. We propose a model in which AIC serves two major functions: integrating bottom-up interoceptive signals with top-down predictions to generate a current awareness state and providing descending predictions to visceral systems that provide a point of reference for autonomic reflexes. We argue that AIC is critical and necessary for emotional awareness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
30 of 91 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is noteworthy that the insular cortex works closely with a network of regions, including the ACC (Critchley, 2004; Critchley et al., 2004; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Fan et al., 2011; Denny et al., 2012; Lindquist et al., 2012), somatosensory cortex (Gu et al., 2013), and amygdala (Etkin and Wager, 2007).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Critchley, 2004 source
The citation to Critchley (2004) is attached to the ACC portion of the sentence, not the somatosensory cortex or amygdala portions. The Anterior Cingulate Cortex section (pp. 6333–6334) states that the ACC is interconnected with insular regions. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not matchedcites Gu et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Etkin and Wager, 2007 source
The Etkin and Wager citation is attached specifically to the amygdala, not to the ACC or somatosensory cortex. In the Discussion section, the paper says the insula is heavily interconnected with the amygdala, supporting the attributed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Three recent case studies specifically examined the effects of bilateral insular lesions on subjective awareness and reported intact interoceptive awareness (Khalsa et al., 2009) and self-awareness (Philippi et al., 2012; Damasio et al., 2013).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 source
The paper reports that Roger, a patient with virtually complete bilateral insula damage, showed interoceptive awareness of heartbeat sensations comparable to healthy participants, though somewhat delayed. In the citing sentence, Khalsa et al. is cited for interoceptive awareness; the self-awareness finding is attributed to the other cited studies. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites Philippi et al., 2012 source
The Results (Behavioral results) describe R’s stable self-concept, and the Discussion (Preserved aspects of Core SA) reports preserved self-recognition and self-agency despite extensive bilateral insular damage. The cited Philippi study therefore supports the self-awareness part of the sentence; the interoceptive-awareness finding is attributed to Khalsa et al., not to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites Damasio et al., 2013 source
The Discussion reports that Patient B. remained conscious and had a robust sense of self despite bilateral insular destruction. The Self-awareness Tasks section also describes tests of his self-recognition, agency, and self-concept. This supports the self-awareness finding attributed to Damasio et al.; the other cited studies are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In autism, lower AIC activations are correlated with higher TAS-20 scores”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Bird et al., 2010 source
The Functional imaging results report a significant negative correlation between TAS-20 scores and left anterior insula activity in the autism spectrum condition group (r = −0.506, P < 0.05). The measured activity was an empathy-related response while participants witnessed their partners receiving pain. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In line with this evidence, several other studies have shown functional dissociation between AIC and ACC in other domains (Sridharan et al., 2008; Eckert et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sridharan et al., 2008 source
The Discussion describes differential roles for the right fronto-insular cortex (AIC) and ACC: despite similar response onset times, the former exerted a strong causal influence on the latter and had higher net causal outflow in all three datasets. This supports the cited paper as evidence of functional dissociation in cognitive control and network switching. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Supportedcites Eckert et al., 2009 source
The Results section (Functional Connectivity of the Right aI/fO, ACC, and DLPFC; page unavailable) reports task-related connectivity differences for the right aI/fO but none significant for the ACC. This supports a functional dissociation between the regions in the word-recognition and flanker tasks. The citation is one of two offered for “several other studies”; this paper supports its own contribution to that statement. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The integration of bottom-up input and top-down recurrent information is considered essential for consciousness to occur (Tononi and Koch, 2008) and is likely to be subserved by long-distance projection neurons (Dehaene et al., 2006; Dehaene and Changeux, 2011).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Dehaene et al., 2006 source
The figure caption in “Accounting for conflicting neuroimaging data” (p. 5) describes conscious access as involving workspace neurons whose long-distance connections enable broadcasting to distant areas. “Top-down amplification, long-distance reverberation, and reportability” (p. 2) likewise links conscious access to long-distance connections and recurrent activity. These passages support the citing sentence’s qualified attribution. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites Dehaene and Changeux, 2011 source
The paper’s neuronal-workspace proposal describes long-range cortical pyramidal cells whose reciprocal connections maintain a representation and whose axons broadcast it across the brain (passage 5; page unavailable). Its discussion of the GNW model also identifies long-range projections as a central anatomical premise (IV. Present Experimental and Theoretical Challenges; page unavailable). This supports the claim that long-distance projection neurons are likely to subserve the integration attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In line with our meta-analysis on empathy studies, it has been commonly demonstrated that AIC and ACC are coactivated in various experimental paradigms (Critchley, 2004; Dosenbach et al., 2006; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Fan et al., 2011) as well as in resting states (Seeley et al., 2007; Britz et al., 2010; Cauda et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2012).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Critchley, 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Anterior Cingulate Cortex section says ACC activity is enhanced in many challenging tasks, supporting the claim’s breadth of ACC activation. It does not establish common coactivation with anterior insula; the Insula and Context section notes that insula activity did not reach significance in the hypoglycemia study it discusses. The resting-state clause cites other papers, not Critchley (2004). (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dosenbach et al., 2006 source
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ACC does not seem to be a critical region in generating awareness, yet it might receive input from AIC and convey the “feeling” information to other brain networks that serve voluntary control functions (Posner and Rothbart, 1998; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Valentini, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posner and Rothbart, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page unavailable), the paper describes awareness as generated by the AIC and then re-represented in the ACC to guide responses. This supports the citing sentence’s hedged distinction between generating awareness and acting on it; the paper does not claim that the ACC has no role in awareness. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This perspective on the AIC as an integral part of hierarchical predictive coding in the brain explains the involvement of AIC across low-level autonomic and sensorimotor (Craig et al., 2000; Sterzer and Kleinschmidt, 2010; Fan et al., 2012) to high-level cognitive and social (Montague and Lohrenz, 2007; King-Casas et al., 2008; Bossaerts, 2010; Kirk et al., 2011) domains.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig et al., 2000 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sterzer and Kleinschmidt, 2010 source
- Partly supportedcites Fan et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Brain activity as a function of non-specific SCR; page not available) link anterior insula activity to autonomic arousal, supporting the autonomic part of the citation. The paper discusses motor regions, but the passages do not establish anterior insula involvement in sensorimotor processing. The hierarchical predictive-coding perspective is the citing authors’ framing, not a claim that needs to be attributed to Fan et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“On the contrary, AIC as well as other subregions of the insular cortex work closely coupled with other brain regions and networks (Cauda et al., 2011; Deen et al., 2011; Peltz et al., 2011) to translate different modalities of information effectively into subjective awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cauda et al., 2011 source
- Partly supportedcites Deen et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report functional connectivity between anterior and posterior insular subregions and other brain regions, while the Introduction describes the insula as a multimodal integration region. The Discussion links these networks to emotional experience and cognitive control, but does not establish that they translate information from different modalities into subjective awareness. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peltz et al., 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesEvery source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Third, patient Roger did exhibit deficits in certain aspects of interoceptive awareness, as reported in supplemental materials by Khalsa and colleagues (2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 source
The paper’s text (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) reports that Roger’s interoceptive ratings were delayed relative to healthy participants and points to Supplementary Fig. 1b. It also reports that, under topical anesthetic, he no longer reported changes in cardiac sensation, while comparison participants remained unaffected. These are deficits in certain aspects or conditions, although his awareness was otherwise comparable. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“patients with bilateral insular damage still preserve certain aspects of emotional awareness, suggesting that emotional feelings might first emerge from the brainstem and hypothalamus, which are later enriched and refined by the insula”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Damasio et al., 2013 source
The Abstract reports that feelings remained intact in a patient with bilateral insular destruction and proposes that feeling states arise first subcortically. In “Emotions and Feelings Based on the Brain Stem Complex” (page not provided), the authors include the hypothalamus in that complex and describe insular activity as a more detailed, second-order mapping of feelings. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The posterior insular cortex has been commonly associated with somatotopic representations of bodily states such as itch, pain and temperature, and touch”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Damasio et al., 2000 source
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2002, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Harrison et al., 2010 source
The Introduction describes a proposed somatotopically organized representation of bodily tissues in the dorsal posterior insula and lists temperature, pain, itch, and sensual touch among the associated sensations. This supports the claim's description of what the region is commonly associated with. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The insular cortex is therefore considered to form an interoceptive image of one’s physiological states and consequently to relay internal needs to subjective awareness of feelings”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig, 2002 source
- Supportedcites Harrison et al., 2010 source
The Introduction describes the posterior insula as representing the physiological condition of bodily tissues and the anterior insula as integrating homeostatic state with other signals to support feeling states. It presents this as a proposed model, consistent with the citing sentence’s ‘considered’ phrasing. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004 source
- Partly supportedcites Singer et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage labeled Abstract reports different empathic neural responses in men and women when they observed an unfair person receiving pain. It does not establish that males and females use different strategies across emotion paradigms; the finding concerns responses in this specific empathy-for-pain task. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ACC does not seem to be a critical region in generating awareness, yet it might receive input from AIC and convey the “feeling” information to other brain networks that serve voluntary control functions (Posner and Rothbart, 1998; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Valentini, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posner and Rothbart, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page not available), the authors propose that AIC integrates awareness of affective state, which is then re-represented in ACC to guide the selection and preparation of responses. This supports the attributed, tentative account of ACC receiving feeling-related information from AIC and helping direct control functions. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The integration of bottom-up input and top-down recurrent information is considered essential for consciousness to occur (Tononi and Koch, 2008) and is likely to be subserved by long-distance projection neurons (Dehaene et al., 2006; Dehaene and Changeux, 2011).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Tononi and Koch, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Reentrant versus Feedforward Activity” (page unavailable), the paper describes a view in which a feedforward sweep becomes conscious when joined by a reentrant sweep. But it presents this as a possibility and questions whether backward signals are critical for consciousness, so it does not establish their integration as essential. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using Granger causal analysis, Sridharan and colleagues (2008) showed that the right AIC has a causal influence on ACC and plays a critical role in switching between the central executive network and the default mode network.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sridharan et al., 2008 source
The Discussion states that the right fronto-insular cortex had a powerful causal influence on the ACC in all three datasets. The paper’s opening summary states that chronometric techniques and Granger causality analysis showed a critical and causal role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between the central-executive and default-mode networks. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Patients with frontotemporal dementia are more alexithymic than matched controls, and such deficits have been associated with abnormalities in pregenual ACC (Sturm and Levenson, 2011) and AIC (Seeley, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sturm and Levenson, 2011 source
The Results (Group Comparisons; page unavailable) report significantly higher alexithymia scores in patients with frontotemporal dementia than in controls. The Methods (Participants; page unavailable) report no group differences in age or education, and the Discussion reports an association between alexithymia and right pregenual ACC volume. The AIC portion of the citing sentence is attributed to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites Seeley, 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction links social–emotional changes in behavioral-variant FTD to frontoinsular degeneration, and the Regional and network features section reports anterior-insula atrophy relative to healthy controls. The copy does not report an alexithymia comparison with matched controls or specifically associate alexithymia with anterior-insula abnormalities. The separate pregenual ACC citation is not being judged here; page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the existence of multiple control regions other than ACC and that AIC is the only critical input region.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Seeley et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ICA and Functional significance sections place the anterior insula/frontoinsula and ACC in the same salience network and discuss interoceptive feedback and ACC error and conflict processing (page numbers unavailable in our copy). They do not characterize AIC specifically as a sensory input region or ACC as the system’s output control region, so the claimed division of roles is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jones et al., 2010 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Empathy is closely related to, yet different from, emotional contagion, in that the latter is merely passive, whereas empathy also involves active and top-down components such as perspective taking and social understanding”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Preston and de Waal, 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Common definitions section (p. 2) distinguishes emotional contagion from empathy and says cognitive empathy can involve perspective taking and top-down processing. Final comments (p. 22) describes emotional contagion as automatic and explains how greater cognitive control can shape empathic responses. But the paper reserves perspective taking for cognitive empathy, not empathy generally, and cautions in Problems with this terminology (p. 3) that empathy and emotional contagion share an underlying process and cannot be fully disentangled. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Decety and Jackson, 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In other words, we borrow from the classical view that ACC serves as a limbic motor region and the AIC as a limbic sensory structure (Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page unavailable), the paper describes AIC as integrating sensory information into awareness and ACC as using that information to select and prepare responses. This supports the cited sensory–motor distinction as a broad functional description, although the paper notes that ACC responses are not necessarily motor. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The right AIC, but not the ACC, is also coupled with brain regions involved in task performance across different domains (Eckert et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Eckert et al., 2009 source
The Results section on functional connectivity reports that right aI/fO coupling differed between the auditory word-recognition and visual flanker tasks, engaging regions relevant to each task. It found no significant task-related differences in connectivity for the ACC. The comparison concerns task-dependent coupling, not an absence of ACC connectivity altogether; the paper also reports connectivity between the ACC and other frontal regions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For instance, he was unable to detect heart rate change at low doses of isoproterenol infusion, his response lag was significantly longer than controls, and his interoceptive awareness was greatly worsened after anesthetic application (Khalsa et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the supplied passage labeled Abstract (page not provided), Roger's awareness ratings were somewhat delayed, and he reported no changes in cardiac sensation after topical anesthetic was applied. The copy does not say he could not detect changes at low isoproterenol doses or establish that his response lag was statistically significantly longer than controls'. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In line with the conceptual framework proposed by Singer and colleagues (2009), a recent empirical study shows that subjects use Bayesian rules to update their feelings and that (feeling) variance in prediction errors scale parametrically with AIC activation (Xiang et al., 2013).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Xiang et al., 2013 source
The Materials and Methods section (‘Feeling Bayesian observer’; page not provided) says subjects performed a Bayesian update upon observing their emoticon ratings. The Results section (‘Feeling prediction errors’; page not provided) reports that bilateral anterior insula activity correlated with feeling variance prediction errors, supporting the claim about AIC activation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
In the paper
“The results suggest that, after controlling for cognitive load, AIC, but not ACC, showed increased activation for painful compared with neutral pictures (Fig. 2B, modified from Gu et al., 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gu et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, right AIC activation is absent in empathy for positive emotions and present only in empathy of pain and negative emotions, whereas left AIC is activated by all valence categories.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, the left AIC showed a more robust interaction effect (surviving in both ROI and whole-brain analyses) than the right AIC.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Behavioral data showed increased response time and error rates for painful compared with nonpainful stimuli under the difficult task TL relative to the easy task TB, indicating an interaction between stimulus valence (i.e., pain) and top-down influence (i.e., task demand).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A posterior-to-anterior gradient in the insular cortex has been proposed, in which physical features of interoception are processed in the posterior insula and the integration of interoception with cognitive and motivational information in the AIC”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009, 2010, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“and the right AIC serves a more dominant role than the left AIC”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009, 2010, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“We argue that AIC is critical and necessary for emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Empathy is a valid test case for emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain activations observed during empathy tasks reflect the neural substrates of emotional awareness.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“patients with focal epileptic seizures that arise from the AIC report heightened emotional awareness and enhanced wellbeing”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Picard, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these findings demonstrate the necessity for AIC, but not ACC, in emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Indeed, ACC also has been considered a significant structure in emotional awareness (Lane et al., 1998; Lieberman, 2007).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Diminished ability to integrate information rapidly among spatially distinct regions may underlie functional deficits in these conditions and, ultimately, in the inability to make quick and intuitive judgments regarding uncertain and rapidly changing social contexts”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Allman et al., 2005 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the existence of multiple control regions other than ACC and that AIC is the only critical input region.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, such synergy did not occur in ACC, which further suggests that AIC and ACC are functionally dissociable and singles out the significance of AIC in subjective awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that emotional awareness is important to mental health and that impaired emotional awareness interferes with normal social function in both clinical and nonclinical populations.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, AIC patients lacked such interference between stimulus valence and laterality judgment, indicating that the integration of stimulus-driven and top-down information was impaired in patients with AIC lesions and that AIC is necessary for bottom-up and top-down integration.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In the framework of predictive coding and hierarchical inference, top-down, higher-level cortical activities try to predict or “explain away” the bottom-up sensory information conveyed by lower-level brain regions (Friston, 2002, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This finding is consistent with the notion that right AIC encodes “energy-consuming” negative feelings”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding points out the importance of AIC, in dissociation from ACC, in emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such signal might be subsequently conveyed to control regions such as ACC and prefrontal cortex for appropriate behavioral output.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sudden changes in reward contingencies and inquisitive policies also activate AIC (Li et al., 2006).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although we agree with the authors that emotional awareness is less likely to be subserved by one neural substrate such as the insula and is more likely to be processed by distributed networks including low-level brainstem and thalamic nuclei, we next discuss possible sources of discrepancies in the findings among studies.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, AIC is able to cause changes in the physiological states of the body, in addition to perceiving changes from the body.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We consider this signal to represent the current state of the organism that, on the one hand, is consistent with top-down predictions from higher-level representations of goals, actions, and attention (e.g., from ACC) and, on the other hand, best predicts future awareness states.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“According to a predictive coding account of the brain (Dayan et al., 1995; Friston, 2002, 2010), bottom-up stimulus-driven projections convey prediction errors, and top-down pathways convey active predictions.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AIC is perfectly placed anatomically to do this; it is equipped with the anatomical and functional foundation to perform the very important task of inducing transitions in physiological states.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with our findings on unilateral AIC lesions in that interoceptive and emotional awareness is impaired but not completely abolished in these patients.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AIC, in this sense, could be where the “sentient self” resides.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a necessary consequence of hierarchical Bayesian inference and the recurrent exchange of neuronal signals implicit in predictive coding.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another study showed that AIC is activated by not only prediction of risk but also the prediction error of risk (Preuschoff et al., 2008), which relates to unexpected uncertainty and state transition (Yu and Dayan, 2005).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Preuschoff et al., 2008 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This model resolves the conceptual dialectic between the James-Lange theory and the Cannon-Bard formulations, in the sense that they are both right: bodily sensations both cause and are caused by central representations.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the AIC both responds to and controls the internal milieu or literally “gut feelings.””
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Empathy is a valid test case for emotional awareness.
“Next we review evidence supporting a critical role of AIC in emotional awareness using empathy as a test case.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain activations observed during empathy tasks reflect the neural substrates of emotional awareness.
“Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people’s emotional states, as a test case, we then present evidence to demonstrate: 1) AIC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are commonly coactivated as revealed by a meta-analysis, 2) AIC is functionally dissociable from ACC, 3) AIC integrates stimulus-driven and top-down information, and 4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
“Participants were asked to judge whether the person in the pictorial stimulus is suffering from pain (“explicit” task pain; TP) or the laterality of limb (“implicit” task laterality; TL).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
“We examined both explicit and implicit empathetic pain perception in three patients with focal AIC lesions, in comparison with patients with focal ACC lesions and neurologically intact controls (Fig. 2D, modified from Gu et al., 2012).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The anatomical feature that AIC is agranular is relevant to its role in generating descending predictions.
“Furthermore, like the motor cortex, the AIC is agranular. This is a remarkable exception to the laminar structure of the neocortex, which is shared only by the motor cortex, the ACC, and the AIC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The analogy between motor cortex control of proprioceptive reflexes and AIC control of autonomic reflexes is valid for inferring AIC function.
“To illustrate the simplicity and potential power of this model, consider the analogous role of the AIC in controlling autonomic reflexes via smooth muscles and the motor cortex in controlling proprioceptive reflexes via striated muscles (Fig. 3, right).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Beyond allostasis, the predictive coding framework proposes that estimating the most likely cause of changes in internal bodily parameters, given a certain exteroceptive context, gives rise to emotional feelings 209-211 , with a particular role for anterior cingulate and anterior insular cortices to generate visceral predictions 212 .”
From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [209]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This work positions the mid-insula as having a critical role for the integration of information relating to bodily states.”
From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Much of these data rest on assuming a central role for the anterior insular cortex (AIC), operating within a rich functional network [30], both as a comparator that registers top-down predictions against bottom-up prediction errors and as a source of anticipatory visceromotor control [6-9,15,16].”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following PC principles, interoceptive prediction errors can be suppressed both by modifying predictions and by transcribing these predictions into reference points for autonomic reflexes that regulate physiological homeostasis, as recently suggested by Gu and colleagues [9].”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Crucially, none identify emotional states with top-down inference of the causes of interoceptive signals, as argued here (and as recently taken up by others [9]).”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While there is ample circumstantial that fits comfortably with this framework (see [9,10,54,56], for reviews), the principles of interoceptive inference rest primarily on the view that perceptual inference—whether about the world or about the body—is likely to involve a common computational architecture.”
From Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The insula has been hypothesized to follow a posterior-to-anterior hierarchy, with primary roles varying from processing afferent signals to gating conscious awareness [47, 48].”
From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting counts for the same empathy category
MinorTwo consecutive sentences assign different numbers of foci, contrasts, and subjects to "This category." The preceding category named is empathy for negative emotions, although the second set of counts may have been intended for empathy for pain.
“The following contrasts were identified as empathy for negative emotions: “compassionate–sad>zcompassionate–neutral” (Kim et al., 2009), and “overlap between observing and feeling disgust” (Wicker et al., 2003). This category included 192 foci from 20 contrasts and 403 subjects.”
“This category included 948 foci from 98 contrasts with 1,598 subjects.”
Citations
Cites
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444 · cited 1×
“…awareness Although several other brain regions such as ACC, amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are commonly implicated (Lane et al., 1998; LeDoux, 2000; Cohen et al., 2001; Adolphs, 2002; Ochsner and Gross, 2005; Phelps, 2006; Duncan and Barrett, 2007; Lieberman, 2007), the insular…”
BackgroundThe free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 5×
“According to a predictive coding account of the brain (Dayan et al., 1995; Friston, 2002, 2010), bottomup stimulus-driven projections convey prediction errors, and top-down pathways convey active predictions.”
InfluentialSelf-citationDissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426 · cited 4×
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the…”
InfluentialHow do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006
Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 · Cited by 5,592 · cited 1×
“…the insular cortex is roughly divided into an anterior agranular portion (anterior insula, AIC), a middle dysgranular portion (middle insula), and a posterior granular portion (posterior insula) in both humans (Flynn et al., 1999; Butti and Hof, 2010; Bauernfeind et al., 2013;…”
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 1×
“…cortex has been commonly associated with somatotopic representations of bodily states such as itch, pain and temperature, and touch (Damasio et al., 2000; Craig, 2002, 2009; Harrison et al., 2010), whereas AIC participates in a wide range of functions, including and beyond bodily representations.”
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093 · cited 2×
“Third, although we were not able to compare gender differences in the current meta-analysis, males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008).”
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929 · cited 2×
“…general emotional processing (Davidson and Irwin, 1999; Zaki et al., 2012), cognitive control (Eckert et al., 2009; Menon and Uddin, 2010), empathy (Singer et al., 2004; Gu and Han, 2007a; Gu et al., 2010, 2012, 2013; Lamm et al., 2010; Ebisch et al., 2011), intuition (Kuo et al., 2009),…”
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lange C, 1885, The emotions. Haupt IA, trans
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 718
Post-traumatic stress disorder: review of DSM criteria and functional neuroanatomy
Thomas, C. W. (2018) · Marshall Journal of Medicine · doi:10.18590/mjm.2018.vol4.iss2.6
“Emotional symptoms The insular cortex, a region involved with introspective emotional awareness, receives ascending peripheral viscerosensory projections via the thalamus, and direct projections from the amygdala (Figure 5).(80,81,82,83) Functional imaging studies suggest that activation of the amygdala-insula circuit…”
BackgroundNeuroimaging Techniques for Investigation of the Insula
Ertekin, E., Tunçyürek, Ö., Turgut, M., & Özsunar, Y. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75468-0_9
Organization and hierarchy of the human functional brain network lead to a chain-like core
Mastrandrea, R., Gabrielli, A., Piras, F., et al. (2017) · IMT Institutional Repository (IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.04782
“Concurrently, the fronto-insular cortex, wherein generation and experience of emotion are found (Gu et al., 2013), is implicated in the elaborate circuitry associated with awareness (Craig, 2009) and uniquely (together with the anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) characterized by the pres…”
BackgroundExamination of Cortical/Thalamic-Striatal Circuitry in Modulating Sensitivity to Alcohol and Relapse
Jaramillo, A. A. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/2g98-g192
Kruse, I. M. (2019) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14519
Emotional reactivity and neuropsychological assessment in ten cases of ablated temporal lobe tumors
Ciuffini, R., Rossetti, M. C., Marrelli, A., Napoleoni, L., Varrassi, M., Marini, C., Splendiani, A., Rossi, R., & Stratta, P. (2019) · Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.npbr.2019.08.004
The Functional Role of the Anterior Insular Cortex in Cognitive Control
Yu, C. (2020) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Gädeke, M., Willems, T., Ahmed, O. S., Weber, B., Hurlemann, R., & Schultz, J. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.25.107300
Evolutionary Perspectives on the Parental Brain
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0011
Anxiety Reduction and Maternal Aggression in Postpartum Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0006
Development of the Parental Brain in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0009
Development of the Parental Brain in Humans
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0010
Brain Mechanisms Regulating Maternal Behavior in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0004
A Precuneal Causal Loop Mediates External and Internal Information Integration in the Human BrainPreprint
Lu, D., Pappas, I., Menon, D. K., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.20.259846
“…hippocampus, which are often implicated in value encoding, emotion, interoception and episodic memory (Chudasama et al., 2013; Euston et al., 2012; Gu et al., 2013; Pessoa, 2008), while the dPCu is more connected with regions in cognitive control networks that are associated with executive,…”
BackgroundKöteles, F. G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63201-4_8
Modiano’nun Encre Sympathique Adlı Romanında Bellek
GÜNGÖR, T. K. (2021) · HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.20304/humanitas.933373
Compassion vs. empathy. Necessary distinctions in approaching medical care
Mihalache, A., & Zăgrean, L. (2021) · Romanian Medical Journal · doi:10.37897/rmj.2021.3.5
Emerging a Human Social Intelligence
Myowa, M. (2022) · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · doi:10.7210/jrsj.40.14
Dehghani, R., & Delavari, F. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10620-1_5
Assessing and Intervening with Children with Nonverbal Learning Disabilities
Semrud‐Clikeman, M. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119790563.ch28
Abraham, S. (2021) · International Journal of Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.23937/2643-4059/1710025
Multi-voxel pattern analysis reveals a neural phenotype for trust bias in adolescentsPreprint
Tashjian, S. M., Moreira, J. F. G., & Galván, A. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pcynu
(2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416040-8.16001-8
David, I. (2021) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/9wsbz
Marazziti, D., & Mucci, F. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.726867804.793557955
Computational Psychiatry and the Bayesian Brain
Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190681425.003.0072
Self-citationNeurobiology of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability
Costales, J. L., Rubeis, S. D., Foss‐Feig, J. H., Hof, P. R., Buxbaum, J. D., & Kolezvon, A. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190681425.003.0063
Self-citationDysfunction of the motivational brain
Xu, P. (2022) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.219070985
Hidalgo‐Lopez, E., Engman, J., Poromaa, I. S., Gingnell, M., & Pletzer, B. A. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.08.11.22278664
Homeostaz ve Tüketici Davranışları: Kavramsal Bir İrdeleme
GÜRSOY, İ., & Ayyıldız, H. (2022) · Tüketici ve tüketim araştırmaları dergisi · doi:10.15659/ttad.14.1.151 · Cited by 1
Triana, A. M., Saramäki, J., Glerean, E., & Hayward, N. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ty8zk
Sex-dependent effects of stress on insular cortex-to-nucleus accumbens synaptic plasticityPreprint
Gauthier, M., Dugast, E., Lardeux, V., Letort, K., Belnoue, L., Balado, É., Solinas, M., & Belujon, P. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.28.555067
“(Gu et al., 2013), would be strengthened in females in basal conditions, increasing information processing in the NAcC.”
BackgroundKasai, A., Yokoyama, R., Ago, Y., Igarashi, H., Higuchi, M., Tanuma, M., Shimazaki, Y., Seiriki, K., Hayashida, M., Yamaguchi, S., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3305430/v1
Mixing Temporal Graphs with MLP for Longitudinal Brain Connectome Analysis
Cho, H., Wu, G., & Kim, W. H. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43895-0_73
Insular Gliomas: A Review of Surgical Anatomy and Operative Considerations
Morshed, R. A., Young, J. S., Haddad, A. F., et al. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3412-6_9
Of Soldiers and Their Ghosts: Are We Ready for a Review of PTSD Evidence?
Sfera, A., Anton, J. J., Imran, H., Kozlakidis, Z., Klein, C. A., & Osorio, C. P. (2023) · BioMed · doi:10.3390/biomed3040039
“Furthermore, dissociative phenomena, such as fl ashbacks and intrusive memories Furthermore, dissociative phenomena, such as flashbacks and intrusive memories, may reflect disruption of insula-mediated emotional intelligence as opposed to the amygdala and fear [37–39].”
BackgroundThe Meltdown Pathway: A Multidisciplinary Account of Autistic MeltdownsPreprint
Soden, P. A., Bhat, A., Anderson, A. K., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/27w9p
Self-citationJamieson, A. J., Davey, C. G., Pujol, J., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3483524/v1
Northoff, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821935-5.00040-5
The Effect of Interpersonal Distance on Vicarious Embarrassment
Hong, R. (2024) · Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences · doi:10.25236/ajhss.2024.070421
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0006
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0003
Abbreviations Used for Major Brain Regions
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0007
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0004
Catatonia, Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome, and Serotonin Syndrome
Praschan, N. C., Beach, S. R., Fricchione, G. L., Huffman, J. C., & Stern, T. A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-11844-9.00038-2
Gerrans, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191994395.003.0004
Gerrans, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191994395.003.0001
Harris, J. C., & Coyle, J. T. (2024) · doi:10.1093/med/9780199928118.003.0013
Harris, J. C., & Coyle, J. T. (2024) · doi:10.1093/med/9780199928118.003.0005
Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa
Neill, E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32046-0_76-1
Alexithymia and Eating Disorders
Enea, V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32046-0_75-1 · Cited by 1
Thermoceptive predictions and prediction errors in the anterior insulaPreprint
Toussaint, B., Heinzle, J., Friedli, N., Zahnd, N., Federici, E., Köchli, L., Harrison, O. K., Iglesias, S., & Stephan, K. E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.11.617819
Ma, Y., & Skipper, J. I. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86762-w · Cited by 2
Lyvers, M., & Stapleton, P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32046-0_78-1
Neural correlates of communication modes in medical students using fMRI
Oprea, R. C., Andersson, F., Gissot, V., Desmidt, T., Siragusa, M. A., Barantin, L., Dubourg, P., & El‐Hage, W. (2025) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z · Cited by 1
“The insula , integral to processing emotional states and social cues, assists in evaluating the emotional tone of conversa - tions, supporting directive communicators in adapting to social and interpersonal dynamics (Gu et al., 2013 ; Uddin, 2015).”
Gädeke, M., Willems, T., Ahmed, O. S., Weber, B., Hurlemann, R., & Schultz, J. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105391.1
Gädeke, M., Willems, T. E., Ahmed, O. S., Weber, B., Hurlemann, R., & Schultz, J. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105391
“AI is associated with emotion awareness (Bird et al., 2010; Gu et al., 2013), and AI lesions combined with poor emotion awareness (alexithymia) are associated with reduced altruistic attitudes (Chau et al.”
Meleshchenko, E. A., Egorova, V. A., & Walgert, A. A. (2025) · Innovative science psychology pedagogy defectology · doi:10.23947/2658-7165-2025-8-1-55-67
Neuroplasticity and Rhinoplasty: Bridging Neuroscience and Aesthetic Surgery
Capelleras, M., Esteve, F., Suárez, G., & Cruellas, M. (2025) · Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/a-2604-7666
“These fi ndings suggest that the emotional recalibration postrhinoplasty could parallel neural adaptations seen in BDD patients, offering valuable lessons for managing patient expectations and supporting psychological recovery.”
Risner, M., Hu, L., & Stamoulis, C. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.05.12.25327434
The functional brain networks of intergroup empathy bias: A meta-analysis based on fMRI studies
Luwen, S. U. N., Yue, Z. H. O. U., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2025.1306
Fuentes, A., Kissel, M., Spikins, P., Molopyane, K., Hawks, J. D., & Berger, L. R. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.89125.2 · Cited by 1
Li, H.-T., Chen, Y., Chaudhary, S., Ide, J. S., & Li, C.-S. R. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.25.661556
“Involved in interoception, emotional awareness, and salience processing (Craig, 2009; Menon and Uddin, 2010; Gu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019), the AI functions as a key limbic input region (Medford and Critchley, 2010).”
Commonalities in cortical neurodegeneration between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease
Motaghi, M., Potvin, O., Duchesne, S., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2025) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877251365671
“32 MCI shows moderate atrophy in the insular cortex, suggesting early neurodegeneration in this region.”
Kochetkova, E. V., & Machinskaya, R. I. (2025) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-025-01868-y
“…in a number of networks involved in the implementation of executive functions [Molnar-Szakacs and Uddin, 2022] and is included in various aspects of processing of emotional and interoceptive information, social interaction tasks (empathy), and the conscious experience of emotions [Gu et al., 2013].”
Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa
Neill, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73363-5_76
Lyvers, M., & Stapleton, P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73363-5_78
Dynamic Regulation of Interoceptive Processing in Relaxation and AnxietyPreprint
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Hua, J., Li, N., Northoff, G., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7435608/v1
Sensing the darkness: Dark therapy, authority, and spiritual experience
Nenadalová, J. (2025) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1177/00846724251379906
Hernández-Vergara, N.-M., Casado‐Aranda, L., Sánchez‐Fernández, J., & Özer, İ. (2025) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2025.2564236 · Cited by 1
“Our significant cluster x ¼ 40, y ¼ 28, z ¼ − 7 also incorporates substrates of the anterior insula, one of the brain regions linked to core affect, which includes motivational states related to personal feelings and objectives (Gu et al. 2013).”
Applying Team Flow to Sport Teams
Kincaid, M. J., van den Hout, J. J. J., & Davis, O. C. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8573-9.ch009
Risner, M., Hu, L., & Stamoulis, C. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334028
“Together, these structures play important roles in emotional processing and regulation but also social function [42,63–65].”
Effects of Deontological and Altruistic Guilt on Empathy
Zhang, Z., & Chen, T. (2025) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.70134
Mental gravity as a translational framework for mental health promotion
Kent, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1650650
Lee, S., Fitzpatrick‐Schmidt, T., Bookman, D., & Edwards, S. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34258-5.00008-6
Zhang, T., Zhang, S., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106384 · Cited by 1
Smith, R. S. (2015) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
N-back task revisited: Comparing the neural correlates of updating and interference controlPreprint
Hidalgo‐Lopez, E. (2025) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/j4cpm
Emotional Intelligence: A Human-Centred AI Perspective
Gámez, M. E. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8440-0_109-1 · Cited by 2
Acute effects of nitrous oxide on visual processing: a connectome study in healthy adultsPreprint
Pouyan, N., Kaplan, C., Larkin, T., Ichesco, E., Eagan, M., Preller, K., Dunworth, J. B., Harris, R. E., Mashour, G. A., & Harte, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8430361/v1
“When connec(cid:415)vity between these hubs is weakened, the normal coordina(cid:415)on of salience detec(cid:415)on and execu(cid:415)ve resources may be impaired, poten(cid:415)ally leading to maladap(cid:415)ve appraisal of sensory input 43 .”
Preference for solitude modulates anterior insula responses to social exclusion
Sakurai, R., Watanabe, R., & Kuruma, H. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121287
Behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying odor modulation of pain perception
Chen, Y., Guo, J., Zhou, W., Zhou, B., & Kong, Y. (2026) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/csb-2025-5720
Gädeke, M., Willems, T., Ahmed, O. S., Weber, B., Hurlemann, R., & Schultz, J. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105391.2
van Mourik, Y., Schetters, D., Bassie, I., Samadi, M. E., Mansvelder, H. D., Vries, T. J. D., & Marchant, N. J. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1180-25.2026 · Cited by 1
Singh, S., Thusyanthan, V., Mizzi, A. L., Levy, Y., Kinley, I., Shaw, S. B., & Becker, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1731382 · Cited by 1
“The insula is substantially involved in emotional processing and interoceptive awareness (Berntson and Khalsa, 2021; Gu et al., 2013; Khalsa et al., 2009; Menon and Uddin, 2010).”
Gädeke, M., Willems, T., Ahmed, O. S., Weber, B., Hurlemann, R., & Schultz, J. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105391.3
Pabón, D. G., Hatfield-King, J., Patel, S., Horn, B., Burkett, J. P., & Andari, E. (2026) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-026-00712-5 · Cited by 1
Modifications émotionnelles dans la sclérose en plaques : étude en neuropsychologie et neuroimagerie
Pfaff, L. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/bf935117z62f7z461bz8258zdae1d6e2e306
Central mechanisms of chronic pruritus : functional and structural brain imaging
Najafi, P. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2d26d334z911bz49daza026z324ddb027a40
A Unified Theory of Disorientation
Velasco, P. F. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ff433dcfzb3dez4274zba3bz3b69e9b94882 · Cited by 1
Neuroplasticity and the Breath
Valappil, I. N. K., Korol, A., Vasanthi, G., Elayaraja, M., & Govindasamy, K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4187-3.ch003
Cea, I. (2026) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/10597123261441534
Het lichaam als (gedempte) klankkast voor emotie
Koelen, J. A., & Derks, Y. P. M. J. (2021) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-2683-9_3
Emotional Intelligence: A Human-Centred AI Perspective
Gámez, M. E. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_109
Arousal contribution on valence-driven affective modulations of time perception
Micillo, L., Cellini, N., Barbiero, J., Cristaldi, F. D. P., Sampaolo, E., Cecchetti, L., & Mioni, G. (2026) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2026.115385
Wen, Z.-G., Yue-Feng, K., Zheng, J.-P., Zhang, H., & Long, L.-L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9507648/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, X., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gu, Xiaosi
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-23
- Volume
- 521
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3371-3388
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC3999437
- OpenAlex
- W1533496174
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 209
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- anterior insula, emotional awareness, empathy, anterior cingulate cortex, interoception, top-down prediction, autonomic reflexes, functional dissociation
- MeSH terms
- Affective Symptoms, Animals, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Consciousness, Emotions, Empathy, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review