The DOI matches its Crossref record; 206 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 30 of the 91 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews the foundation for a role of the human anterior insular cortex (AIC) in emotional awareness, defined as the conscious experience of emotions. We first introduce the neuroanatomical features of AIC and existing findings on emotional awareness. Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people's emotional states, as a test case, we then present evidence to demonstrate: 1) AIC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are commonly coactivated as revealed by a meta-analysis, 2) AIC is functionally dissociable from ACC, 3) AIC integrates stimulus-driven and top-down information, and 4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness. We propose a model in which AIC serves two major functions: integrating bottom-up interoceptive signals with top-down predictions to generate a current awareness state and providing descending predictions to visceral systems that provide a point of reference for autonomic reflexes. We argue that AIC is critical and necessary for emotional awareness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
30 of 91 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is noteworthy that the insular cortex works closely with a network of regions, including the ACC (Critchley, 2004; Critchley et al., 2004; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Fan et al., 2011; Denny et al., 2012; Lindquist et al., 2012), somatosensory cortex (Gu et al., 2013), and amygdala (Etkin and Wager, 2007).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Critchley, 2004 source
The citation to Critchley (2004) is attached to the ACC portion of the sentence, not the somatosensory cortex or amygdala portions. The Anterior Cingulate Cortex section (pp. 6333–6334) states that the ACC is interconnected with insular regions. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not matchedcites Gu et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Etkin and Wager, 2007 source
The Etkin and Wager citation is attached specifically to the amygdala, not to the ACC or somatosensory cortex. In the Discussion section, the paper says the insula is heavily interconnected with the amygdala, supporting the attributed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Three recent case studies specifically examined the effects of bilateral insular lesions on subjective awareness and reported intact interoceptive awareness (Khalsa et al., 2009) and self-awareness (Philippi et al., 2012; Damasio et al., 2013).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 source
The paper reports that Roger, a patient with virtually complete bilateral insula damage, showed interoceptive awareness of heartbeat sensations comparable to healthy participants, though somewhat delayed. In the citing sentence, Khalsa et al. is cited for interoceptive awareness; the self-awareness finding is attributed to the other cited studies. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites Philippi et al., 2012 source
The Results (Behavioral results) describe R’s stable self-concept, and the Discussion (Preserved aspects of Core SA) reports preserved self-recognition and self-agency despite extensive bilateral insular damage. The cited Philippi study therefore supports the self-awareness part of the sentence; the interoceptive-awareness finding is attributed to Khalsa et al., not to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites Damasio et al., 2013 source
The Discussion reports that Patient B. remained conscious and had a robust sense of self despite bilateral insular destruction. The Self-awareness Tasks section also describes tests of his self-recognition, agency, and self-concept. This supports the self-awareness finding attributed to Damasio et al.; the other cited studies are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In autism, lower AIC activations are correlated with higher TAS-20 scores”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Bird et al., 2010 source
The Functional imaging results report a significant negative correlation between TAS-20 scores and left anterior insula activity in the autism spectrum condition group (r = −0.506, P < 0.05). The measured activity was an empathy-related response while participants witnessed their partners receiving pain. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In line with this evidence, several other studies have shown functional dissociation between AIC and ACC in other domains (Sridharan et al., 2008; Eckert et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sridharan et al., 2008 source
The Discussion describes differential roles for the right fronto-insular cortex (AIC) and ACC: despite similar response onset times, the former exerted a strong causal influence on the latter and had higher net causal outflow in all three datasets. This supports the cited paper as evidence of functional dissociation in cognitive control and network switching. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Supportedcites Eckert et al., 2009 source
The Results section (Functional Connectivity of the Right aI/fO, ACC, and DLPFC; page unavailable) reports task-related connectivity differences for the right aI/fO but none significant for the ACC. This supports a functional dissociation between the regions in the word-recognition and flanker tasks. The citation is one of two offered for “several other studies”; this paper supports its own contribution to that statement. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The integration of bottom-up input and top-down recurrent information is considered essential for consciousness to occur (Tononi and Koch, 2008) and is likely to be subserved by long-distance projection neurons (Dehaene et al., 2006; Dehaene and Changeux, 2011).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Dehaene et al., 2006 source
The figure caption in “Accounting for conflicting neuroimaging data” (p. 5) describes conscious access as involving workspace neurons whose long-distance connections enable broadcasting to distant areas. “Top-down amplification, long-distance reverberation, and reportability” (p. 2) likewise links conscious access to long-distance connections and recurrent activity. These passages support the citing sentence’s qualified attribution. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites Dehaene and Changeux, 2011 source
The paper’s neuronal-workspace proposal describes long-range cortical pyramidal cells whose reciprocal connections maintain a representation and whose axons broadcast it across the brain (passage 5; page unavailable). Its discussion of the GNW model also identifies long-range projections as a central anatomical premise (IV. Present Experimental and Theoretical Challenges; page unavailable). This supports the claim that long-distance projection neurons are likely to subserve the integration attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In line with our meta-analysis on empathy studies, it has been commonly demonstrated that AIC and ACC are coactivated in various experimental paradigms (Critchley, 2004; Dosenbach et al., 2006; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Fan et al., 2011) as well as in resting states (Seeley et al., 2007; Britz et al., 2010; Cauda et al., 2011; Fan et al., 2012).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Critchley, 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Anterior Cingulate Cortex section says ACC activity is enhanced in many challenging tasks, supporting the claim’s breadth of ACC activation. It does not establish common coactivation with anterior insula; the Insula and Context section notes that insula activity did not reach significance in the hypoglycemia study it discusses. The resting-state clause cites other papers, not Critchley (2004). (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dosenbach et al., 2006 source
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ACC does not seem to be a critical region in generating awareness, yet it might receive input from AIC and convey the “feeling” information to other brain networks that serve voluntary control functions (Posner and Rothbart, 1998; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Valentini, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posner and Rothbart, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page unavailable), the paper describes awareness as generated by the AIC and then re-represented in the ACC to guide responses. This supports the citing sentence’s hedged distinction between generating awareness and acting on it; the paper does not claim that the ACC has no role in awareness. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This perspective on the AIC as an integral part of hierarchical predictive coding in the brain explains the involvement of AIC across low-level autonomic and sensorimotor (Craig et al., 2000; Sterzer and Kleinschmidt, 2010; Fan et al., 2012) to high-level cognitive and social (Montague and Lohrenz, 2007; King-Casas et al., 2008; Bossaerts, 2010; Kirk et al., 2011) domains.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig et al., 2000 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sterzer and Kleinschmidt, 2010 source
- Partly supportedcites Fan et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Brain activity as a function of non-specific SCR; page not available) link anterior insula activity to autonomic arousal, supporting the autonomic part of the citation. The paper discusses motor regions, but the passages do not establish anterior insula involvement in sensorimotor processing. The hierarchical predictive-coding perspective is the citing authors’ framing, not a claim that needs to be attributed to Fan et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“On the contrary, AIC as well as other subregions of the insular cortex work closely coupled with other brain regions and networks (Cauda et al., 2011; Deen et al., 2011; Peltz et al., 2011) to translate different modalities of information effectively into subjective awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cauda et al., 2011 source
- Partly supportedcites Deen et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report functional connectivity between anterior and posterior insular subregions and other brain regions, while the Introduction describes the insula as a multimodal integration region. The Discussion links these networks to emotional experience and cognitive control, but does not establish that they translate information from different modalities into subjective awareness. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peltz et al., 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesEvery source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Third, patient Roger did exhibit deficits in certain aspects of interoceptive awareness, as reported in supplemental materials by Khalsa and colleagues (2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 source
The paper’s text (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) reports that Roger’s interoceptive ratings were delayed relative to healthy participants and points to Supplementary Fig. 1b. It also reports that, under topical anesthetic, he no longer reported changes in cardiac sensation, while comparison participants remained unaffected. These are deficits in certain aspects or conditions, although his awareness was otherwise comparable. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“patients with bilateral insular damage still preserve certain aspects of emotional awareness, suggesting that emotional feelings might first emerge from the brainstem and hypothalamus, which are later enriched and refined by the insula”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Damasio et al., 2013 source
The Abstract reports that feelings remained intact in a patient with bilateral insular destruction and proposes that feeling states arise first subcortically. In “Emotions and Feelings Based on the Brain Stem Complex” (page not provided), the authors include the hypothalamus in that complex and describe insular activity as a more detailed, second-order mapping of feelings. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The posterior insular cortex has been commonly associated with somatotopic representations of bodily states such as itch, pain and temperature, and touch”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Damasio et al., 2000 source
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2002, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Harrison et al., 2010 source
The Introduction describes a proposed somatotopically organized representation of bodily tissues in the dorsal posterior insula and lists temperature, pain, itch, and sensual touch among the associated sensations. This supports the claim's description of what the region is commonly associated with. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The insular cortex is therefore considered to form an interoceptive image of one’s physiological states and consequently to relay internal needs to subjective awareness of feelings”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig, 2002 source
- Supportedcites Harrison et al., 2010 source
The Introduction describes the posterior insula as representing the physiological condition of bodily tissues and the anterior insula as integrating homeostatic state with other signals to support feeling states. It presents this as a proposed model, consistent with the citing sentence’s ‘considered’ phrasing. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004 source
- Partly supportedcites Singer et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage labeled Abstract reports different empathic neural responses in men and women when they observed an unfair person receiving pain. It does not establish that males and females use different strategies across emotion paradigms; the finding concerns responses in this specific empathy-for-pain task. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ACC does not seem to be a critical region in generating awareness, yet it might receive input from AIC and convey the “feeling” information to other brain networks that serve voluntary control functions (Posner and Rothbart, 1998; Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010; Valentini, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posner and Rothbart, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page not available), the authors propose that AIC integrates awareness of affective state, which is then re-represented in ACC to guide the selection and preparation of responses. This supports the attributed, tentative account of ACC receiving feeling-related information from AIC and helping direct control functions. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The integration of bottom-up input and top-down recurrent information is considered essential for consciousness to occur (Tononi and Koch, 2008) and is likely to be subserved by long-distance projection neurons (Dehaene et al., 2006; Dehaene and Changeux, 2011).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Tononi and Koch, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Reentrant versus Feedforward Activity” (page unavailable), the paper describes a view in which a feedforward sweep becomes conscious when joined by a reentrant sweep. But it presents this as a possibility and questions whether backward signals are critical for consciousness, so it does not establish their integration as essential. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using Granger causal analysis, Sridharan and colleagues (2008) showed that the right AIC has a causal influence on ACC and plays a critical role in switching between the central executive network and the default mode network.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sridharan et al., 2008 source
The Discussion states that the right fronto-insular cortex had a powerful causal influence on the ACC in all three datasets. The paper’s opening summary states that chronometric techniques and Granger causality analysis showed a critical and causal role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between the central-executive and default-mode networks. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Patients with frontotemporal dementia are more alexithymic than matched controls, and such deficits have been associated with abnormalities in pregenual ACC (Sturm and Levenson, 2011) and AIC (Seeley, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sturm and Levenson, 2011 source
The Results (Group Comparisons; page unavailable) report significantly higher alexithymia scores in patients with frontotemporal dementia than in controls. The Methods (Participants; page unavailable) report no group differences in age or education, and the Discussion reports an association between alexithymia and right pregenual ACC volume. The AIC portion of the citing sentence is attributed to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites Seeley, 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction links social–emotional changes in behavioral-variant FTD to frontoinsular degeneration, and the Regional and network features section reports anterior-insula atrophy relative to healthy controls. The copy does not report an alexithymia comparison with matched controls or specifically associate alexithymia with anterior-insula abnormalities. The separate pregenual ACC citation is not being judged here; page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the existence of multiple control regions other than ACC and that AIC is the only critical input region.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Seeley et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ICA and Functional significance sections place the anterior insula/frontoinsula and ACC in the same salience network and discuss interoceptive feedback and ACC error and conflict processing (page numbers unavailable in our copy). They do not characterize AIC specifically as a sensory input region or ACC as the system’s output control region, so the claimed division of roles is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jones et al., 2010 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Empathy is closely related to, yet different from, emotional contagion, in that the latter is merely passive, whereas empathy also involves active and top-down components such as perspective taking and social understanding”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Preston and de Waal, 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Common definitions section (p. 2) distinguishes emotional contagion from empathy and says cognitive empathy can involve perspective taking and top-down processing. Final comments (p. 22) describes emotional contagion as automatic and explains how greater cognitive control can shape empathic responses. But the paper reserves perspective taking for cognitive empathy, not empathy generally, and cautions in Problems with this terminology (p. 3) that empathy and emotional contagion share an underlying process and cannot be fully disentangled. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Decety and Jackson, 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In other words, we borrow from the classical view that ACC serves as a limbic motor region and the AIC as a limbic sensory structure (Craig, 2009; Medford and Critchley, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Medford and Critchley, 2010 source
In “Joint action of ACC and AIC” (page unavailable), the paper describes AIC as integrating sensory information into awareness and ACC as using that information to select and prepare responses. This supports the cited sensory–motor distinction as a broad functional description, although the paper notes that ACC responses are not necessarily motor. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The right AIC, but not the ACC, is also coupled with brain regions involved in task performance across different domains (Eckert et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Eckert et al., 2009 source
The Results section on functional connectivity reports that right aI/fO coupling differed between the auditory word-recognition and visual flanker tasks, engaging regions relevant to each task. It found no significant task-related differences in connectivity for the ACC. The comparison concerns task-dependent coupling, not an absence of ACC connectivity altogether; the paper also reports connectivity between the ACC and other frontal regions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For instance, he was unable to detect heart rate change at low doses of isoproterenol infusion, his response lag was significantly longer than controls, and his interoceptive awareness was greatly worsened after anesthetic application (Khalsa et al., 2009).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Khalsa et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the supplied passage labeled Abstract (page not provided), Roger's awareness ratings were somewhat delayed, and he reported no changes in cardiac sensation after topical anesthetic was applied. The copy does not say he could not detect changes at low isoproterenol doses or establish that his response lag was statistically significantly longer than controls'. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In line with the conceptual framework proposed by Singer and colleagues (2009), a recent empirical study shows that subjects use Bayesian rules to update their feelings and that (feeling) variance in prediction errors scale parametrically with AIC activation (Xiang et al., 2013).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Xiang et al., 2013 source
The Materials and Methods section (‘Feeling Bayesian observer’; page not provided) says subjects performed a Bayesian update upon observing their emoticon ratings. The Results section (‘Feeling prediction errors’; page not provided) reports that bilateral anterior insula activity correlated with feeling variance prediction errors, supporting the claim about AIC activation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
In the paper
“The results suggest that, after controlling for cognitive load, AIC, but not ACC, showed increased activation for painful compared with neutral pictures (Fig. 2B, modified from Gu et al., 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gu et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, right AIC activation is absent in empathy for positive emotions and present only in empathy of pain and negative emotions, whereas left AIC is activated by all valence categories.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, the left AIC showed a more robust interaction effect (surviving in both ROI and whole-brain analyses) than the right AIC.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Behavioral data showed increased response time and error rates for painful compared with nonpainful stimuli under the difficult task TL relative to the easy task TB, indicating an interaction between stimulus valence (i.e., pain) and top-down influence (i.e., task demand).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A posterior-to-anterior gradient in the insular cortex has been proposed, in which physical features of interoception are processed in the posterior insula and the integration of interoception with cognitive and motivational information in the AIC”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009, 2010, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“and the right AIC serves a more dominant role than the left AIC”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2009, 2010, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“We argue that AIC is critical and necessary for emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Empathy is a valid test case for emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain activations observed during empathy tasks reflect the neural substrates of emotional awareness.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“patients with focal epileptic seizures that arise from the AIC report heightened emotional awareness and enhanced wellbeing”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Brain mechanisms of emotional awareness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Picard, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these findings demonstrate the necessity for AIC, but not ACC, in emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Indeed, ACC also has been considered a significant structure in emotional awareness (Lane et al., 1998; Lieberman, 2007).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Diminished ability to integrate information rapidly among spatially distinct regions may underlie functional deficits in these conditions and, ultimately, in the inability to make quick and intuitive judgments regarding uncertain and rapidly changing social contexts”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Allman et al., 2005 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the existence of multiple control regions other than ACC and that AIC is the only critical input region.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, such synergy did not occur in ACC, which further suggests that AIC and ACC are functionally dissociable and singles out the significance of AIC in subjective awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that emotional awareness is important to mental health and that impaired emotional awareness interferes with normal social function in both clinical and nonclinical populations.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMOTIONAL AWARENESS: EXISTING FINDINGS AND THEORIES > Clinical significance: alexithymia and related disorders
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, AIC patients lacked such interference between stimulus valence and laterality judgment, indicating that the integration of stimulus-driven and top-down information was impaired in patients with AIC lesions and that AIC is necessary for bottom-up and top-down integration.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In the framework of predictive coding and hierarchical inference, top-down, higher-level cortical activities try to predict or “explain away” the bottom-up sensory information conveyed by lower-level brain regions (Friston, 2002, 2010).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This finding is consistent with the notion that right AIC encodes “energy-consuming” negative feelings”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Coactivation of AIC and ACC: a meta-analysis on empathy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding points out the importance of AIC, in dissociation from ACC, in emotional awareness.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > Functional dissociation between AIC and ACC
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such signal might be subsequently conveyed to control regions such as ACC and prefrontal cortex for appropriate behavioral output.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC integrates top-down and bottom-up information
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sudden changes in reward contingencies and inquisitive policies also activate AIC (Li et al., 2006).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although we agree with the authors that emotional awareness is less likely to be subserved by one neural substrate such as the insula and is more likely to be processed by distributed networks including low-level brainstem and thalamic nuclei, we next discuss possible sources of discrepancies in the findings among studies.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, AIC is able to cause changes in the physiological states of the body, in addition to perceiving changes from the body.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We consider this signal to represent the current state of the organism that, on the one hand, is consistent with top-down predictions from higher-level representations of goals, actions, and attention (e.g., from ACC) and, on the other hand, best predicts future awareness states.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“According to a predictive coding account of the brain (Dayan et al., 1995; Friston, 2002, 2010), bottom-up stimulus-driven projections convey prediction errors, and top-down pathways convey active predictions.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AIC is perfectly placed anatomically to do this; it is equipped with the anatomical and functional foundation to perform the very important task of inducing transitions in physiological states.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with our findings on unilateral AIC lesions in that interoceptive and emotional awareness is impaired but not completely abolished in these patients.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > EMPATHY AS A TEST CASE FOR EMOTIONAL AWARENESS > AIC is necessary for emotional awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AIC, in this sense, could be where the “sentient self” resides.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a necessary consequence of hierarchical Bayesian inference and the recurrent exchange of neuronal signals implicit in predictive coding.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another study showed that AIC is activated by not only prediction of risk but also the prediction error of risk (Preuschoff et al., 2008), which relates to unexpected uncertainty and state transition (Yu and Dayan, 2005).”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Preuschoff et al., 2008 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This model resolves the conceptual dialectic between the James-Lange theory and the Cannon-Bard formulations, in the sense that they are both right: bodily sensations both cause and are caused by central representations.”
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the AIC both responds to and controls the internal milieu or literally “gut feelings.””
§ Anterior Insular Cortex and Emotional Awareness > SUMMARY: A MODEL OF AIC AND EMOTIONAL AWARENESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Empathy is a valid test case for emotional awareness.
“Next we review evidence supporting a critical role of AIC in emotional awareness using empathy as a test case.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain activations observed during empathy tasks reflect the neural substrates of emotional awareness.
“Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people’s emotional states, as a test case, we then present evidence to demonstrate: 1) AIC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are commonly coactivated as revealed by a meta-analysis, 2) AIC is functionally dissociable from ACC, 3) AIC integrates stimulus-driven and top-down information, and 4) AIC is necessary for emotional awareness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The explicit and implicit empathetic pain tasks validly measure emotional awareness.
“Participants were asked to judge whether the person in the pictorial stimulus is suffering from pain (“explicit” task pain; TP) or the laterality of limb (“implicit” task laterality; TL).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Focal AIC lesions in the three patients are sufficiently selective to test the necessity of AIC for emotional awareness.
“We examined both explicit and implicit empathetic pain perception in three patients with focal AIC lesions, in comparison with patients with focal ACC lesions and neurologically intact controls (Fig. 2D, modified from Gu et al., 2012).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The anatomical feature that AIC is agranular is relevant to its role in generating descending predictions.
“Furthermore, like the motor cortex, the AIC is agranular. This is a remarkable exception to the laminar structure of the neocortex, which is shared only by the motor cortex, the ACC, and the AIC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The analogy between motor cortex control of proprioceptive reflexes and AIC control of autonomic reflexes is valid for inferring AIC function.
“To illustrate the simplicity and potential power of this model, consider the analogous role of the AIC in controlling autonomic reflexes via smooth muscles and the motor cortex in controlling proprioceptive reflexes via striated muscles (Fig. 3, right).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Beyond allostasis, the predictive coding framework proposes that estimating the most likely cause of changes in internal bodily parameters, given a certain exteroceptive context, gives rise to emotional feelings 209-211 , with a particular role for anterior cingulate and anterior insular cortices to generate visceral predictions 212 .”
From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [209]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This work positions the mid-insula as having a critical role for the integration of information relating to bodily states.”
From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Much of these data rest on assuming a central role for the anterior insular cortex (AIC), operating within a rich functional network [30], both as a comparator that registers top-down predictions against bottom-up prediction errors and as a source of anticipatory visceromotor control [6-9,15,16].”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following PC principles, interoceptive prediction errors can be suppressed both by modifying predictions and by transcribing these predictions into reference points for autonomic reflexes that regulate physiological homeostasis, as recently suggested by Gu and colleagues [9].”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Crucially, none identify emotional states with top-down inference of the causes of interoceptive signals, as argued here (and as recently taken up by others [9]).”
From Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While there is ample circumstantial that fits comfortably with this framework (see [9,10,54,56], for reviews), the principles of interoceptive inference rest primarily on the view that perceptual inference—whether about the world or about the body—is likely to involve a common computational architecture.”
From Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The insula has been hypothesized to follow a posterior-to-anterior hierarchy, with primary roles varying from processing afferent signals to gating conscious awareness [47, 48].”
From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting counts for the same empathy category
MinorTwo consecutive sentences assign different numbers of foci, contrasts, and subjects to "This category." The preceding category named is empathy for negative emotions, although the second set of counts may have been intended for empathy for pain.
“The following contrasts were identified as empathy for negative emotions: “compassionate–sad>zcompassionate–neutral” (Kim et al., 2009), and “overlap between observing and feeling disgust” (Wicker et al., 2003). This category included 192 foci from 20 contrasts and 403 subjects.”
“This category included 948 foci from 98 contrasts with 1,598 subjects.”
Citations
Cites
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444 · cited 1×
“…awareness Although several other brain regions such as ACC, amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are commonly implicated (Lane et al., 1998; LeDoux, 2000; Cohen et al., 2001; Adolphs, 2002; Ochsner and Gross, 2005; Phelps, 2006; Duncan and Barrett, 2007; Lieberman, 2007), the insular…”
BackgroundThe free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 5×
“According to a predictive coding account of the brain (Dayan et al., 1995; Friston, 2002, 2010), bottomup stimulus-driven projections convey prediction errors, and top-down pathways convey active predictions.”
InfluentialSelf-citationDissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426 · cited 4×
“Although AIC and ACC are usually considered as one system with AIC as the input sensory region and ACC as the output control region (Seeley et al., 2007; Craig, 2009; Jones et al., 2010), the finding that ACC is usually activated by but not necessary for empathetic pain perception suggests the…”
InfluentialHow do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006
Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 · Cited by 5,592 · cited 1×
“…the insular cortex is roughly divided into an anterior agranular portion (anterior insula, AIC), a middle dysgranular portion (middle insula), and a posterior granular portion (posterior insula) in both humans (Flynn et al., 1999; Butti and Hof, 2010; Bauernfeind et al., 2013;…”
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 1×
“…cortex has been commonly associated with somatotopic representations of bodily states such as itch, pain and temperature, and touch (Damasio et al., 2000; Craig, 2002, 2009; Harrison et al., 2010), whereas AIC participates in a wide range of functions, including and beyond bodily representations.”
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093 · cited 2×
“Third, although we were not able to compare gender differences in the current meta-analysis, males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008).”
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929 · cited 2×
“…general emotional processing (Davidson and Irwin, 1999; Zaki et al., 2012), cognitive control (Eckert et al., 2009; Menon and Uddin, 2010), empathy (Singer et al., 2004; Gu and Han, 2007a; Gu et al., 2010, 2012, 2013; Lamm et al., 2010; Ebisch et al., 2011), intuition (Kuo et al., 2009),…”
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lange C, 1885, The emotions. Haupt IA, trans
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self
Seth, A. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 · Cited by 1,816
Interoceptive predictions in the brain
Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3950 · Cited by 1,766
Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004 · Cited by 1,624
“For each trial, an accuracy score was derived: 1 − (|nbeatsreal − nbeatsreported|)/((nbeatsreal + nbeatsreported)/2): Resulting accuracy scores were averaged over the 6 trials, yielding an average value for each participant (Hart et al., 2013).”
MethodActive interoceptive inference and the emotional brain
Seth, A. K., & Friston, K. J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0007 · Cited by 945
“If this explanation is right, then it provides a clear pointer to abnormalities of (precision) gain control in cortical systems mediating interoceptive inference such as the anterior insular and cingulate cortex (84, 85).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDenny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00233 · Cited by 830
Chen, W. G., Schloesser, D., Arensdorf, A. M., Simmons, J. M., Cui, C., Valentino, R., Gnadt, J. W., Nielsen, L., Hillaire-Clarke, C. S., Spruance, V., et al. (2021) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.007 · Cited by 707
Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001 · Cited by 650
“This is accommodated by predictions about transitions over increasingly protracted time scales (Friston, 2008; Pezzulo, 2012).”
Self-citationSchurz, M., Raduà, J., Tholen, M. G., Maliske, L., Margulies, D. S., Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., & Kanske, P. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000303 · Cited by 702
Guendelman, S., Medeiros, S., & Rampes, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00220 · Cited by 577
“Note that the PI is preferentially involved in interoception and the AI in emotion reactivity/generation and emotional awareness (Craig, 2009; Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundComputational psychiatry: the brain as a phantastic organ
Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70275-5 · Cited by 531
Self-citationAutism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models
Varghese, M., Keshav, N., Jacot-Descombes, S., Warda, T., Wicinski, B., Dickstein, D. L., Harony-Nicolas, H., De Rubeis, S., Drapeau, E., Buxbaum, J. D., et al. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1736-4 · Cited by 536
Self-citationThe hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration
Smith, R., Thayer, J. F., Khalsa, S. S., & Lane, R. D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.003 · Cited by 523
Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala
Šimić, G., Tkalčić, M., Vukić, V., Mulc, D., Španić, E., Šagud, M., Olucha-Bordonau, F. E., Vukšić, M., & Hof, P. R. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11060823 · Cited by 631
“The somatic marker hypothesis further assumes that the representation of the body is necessary not only for emotions [56], but also for a broader core self-image, crucial for feelings to arise [4], which is in agreement with the notion that conscious experience cannot occur without feelings and interoception [57,58].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAllostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression
Stephan, K. E., Manjaly, Z. M., Mathys, C. D., Weber, L. A. E., Paliwal, S., Gard, T., Tittgemeyer, M., Fleming, S. M., Haker, H., Seth, A. K., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00550 · Cited by 437
“…to both the body and the physical and social world outside the body; this is for notational brevity only and not meant to disregard differences in how bodily, social and physical states can influence brain activity in general and the emergence of fatigue in particular; a topic we return to below.”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind
Allen, M., & Friston, K. J. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5 · Cited by 386
“This proposed role for the insula as a core module in the interoceptive hierarchy is a key motif appearing in a variety of related approaches (Barrett and Simmons 2015; Gu et al. 2013; Seth 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn Active Inference Approach to Interoceptive Psychopathology
Paulus, M. P., Feinstein, J. S., & Khalsa, S. S. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095617 · Cited by 394
“However, we do not subscribe to the more extreme view that holds that the insula is necessary for interoceptive awareness (Craig 2002), self-awareness (Craig 2009), emotional awareness (Gu et al. 2013), and pain (Segerdahl et al. 2015).”
Background‘Bodily precision’: A predictive coding account of individual differences in interoceptive accuracy
Ainley, V., Apps, M. A. J., Fotopoulou, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0003 · Cited by 285
“assumes that attention increases the precision of PEs associated with the heartbeat, which are 284 then cascaded up through the hierarchy causing activity visible in the anterior insula under 285 fMRI (40).”
BackgroundThreat and the body: how the heart supports fear processing
Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.005 · Cited by 298
“The feeling of selfhood may arise from internal agency associated with accurate predictions about the inner physiological state of the body, while negative emotions such as anxiety may emerge from interoceptive prediction errors [92–94].”
Insular Cortex is Critical for the Perception, Modulation, and Chronification of Pain
Lu, C., Yang, T., Zhao, H., Zhang, M., Meng, F., Fu, H., Xie, Y., & Xu, H. (2016) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-016-0016-y · Cited by 270
“Right AI activation is absent in empathy for positive emotions and is present only in empathy for negative emotions such as pain, whereas the left AI is activated by all valence categories [52].”
BackgroundBrain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies
Arsalidou, M., Pawliw-Levac, M., Sadeghi, M., & Pascual‐Leone, J. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.002 · Cited by 285
“Initially, the insula became known for its involvement in affective processes (for meta-analyses, see Gu et al., 2013; Duerden et al., 2013).”
Adolfi, F., Couto, B., Richter, F., Decety, J., Lopez, J., Sigman, M., Manes, F., & Ibáñez, A. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.019 · Cited by 238
Focus of attention modulates the heartbeat evoked potential
Petzschner, F. H., Weber, L. A., Wellstein, K. V., Paolini, G., Do, C. T., & Stephan, K. E. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.037 · Cited by 248
The neural basis of one's own conscious and unconscious emotional states
Smith, R. S., & Lane, R. D. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.003 · Cited by 253
Noordermeer, S. D. S., Luman, M., & Oosterlaan, J. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8 · Cited by 256
“The insula is also involved in emotional information processing, and is necessary for empathic pain perception and compassion, hence referring to hot EF, but also for the integration of emotional and cognitive processes, thus referring to cool EF (Gu et al. 2012, 2013; Lamm and Singer 2010).”
BackgroundThe Organization of the Primate Insular Cortex
Evrard, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2019.00043 · Cited by 242
“, (Bartels and Zeki, 2004; Gu et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2015)], empathy (Lamm and Singer, 2010), as well as more complex perceptions, such as, the recognition of oneself in a mirror (Devue and Bredart, 2011) and other visual perceptual tasks (Salomon et al.”
BackgroundUnconscious processing of emotions and the right hemisphere
Gainotti, G. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.005 · Cited by 283
Interoceptive rhythms in the brain
Engelen, T., Solcà, M., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01425-1 · Cited by 207
Smith, R. S., Kuplicki, R., Feinstein, J. S., Forthman, K. L., Stewart, J. L., Paulus, M. P., Tulsa 1000 investigators, & Khalsa, S. S. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008484 · Cited by 207
What is mood? A computational perspective
Clark, J. E., Watson, S., & Friston, K. J. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718000430 · Cited by 204
“In this setting, negative emotions contextualise events that induce expectations of unpredictability, while positive emotions refer to events that resolve uncertainty and confer a feeling of control (Barrett & Satpute, 2013; Gu et al. 2013).”
BackgroundAnterior insular cortex plays a critical role in interoceptive attention
Wang, X., Wu, Q., Egan, L., Gu, X., Liu, P., Gu, H., Yang, Y., Luo, J., Wu, Y., Gao, Z., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42265 · Cited by 204
“In the context of interoceptive and embodied predictive coding (Allen and Friston, 2018; Gu et al., 2013), previous studies hypothesized that interoceptive predictions are computed within a network of brain regions with the AIC as the key node (Allen et al.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAn information theory account of cognitive control
Fan, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00680 · Cited by 214
Self-citationPetzschner, F. H., Weber, L. A. E., Gard, T., & Stephan, K. E. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.012 · Cited by 181
“However, the same inference challenge exists with regard to bodily states (interoception) (76 – 78).”
Interoception in autism Spectrum disorder: a review
DuBois, D., Ameis, S. H., Lai, M., Casanova, M. F., & Desarkar, P. (2016) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2016.05.001 · Cited by 192
Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence
Allen, M., Frank, D., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Fardo, F., Winston, J. S., Hauser, T. U., & Rees, G. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18103 · Cited by 182
Disrupted Dorsal Mid-Insula Activation During Interoception Across Psychiatric Disorders
Nord, C. L., Lawson, R. P., & Dalgleish, T. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20091340 · Cited by 171
“This makes the mid-insula well placed to serve as an intermediary between the processing of sensory representation of bodily state in the posterior insula (31) and the abstract representation of affective state in the anterior insula (34), where the latter, as demonstrated empirically in our conjunction analysis, appe…”
BackgroundChuan-Peng, H., Di, X., Eickhoff, S. B., Zhang, M., Peng, K., Guo, H., & Sui, J. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.003 · Cited by 188
Dwelling quietly in the rich club: brain network determinants of slow cortical fluctuations
Gollo, L. L., Zalesky, A., Hutchison, R. M., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Breakspear, M. J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0165 · Cited by 189
The brain’s action-mode network
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Raichle, M. E., & Gordon, E. M. (2025) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00895-x · Cited by 224
“The physical adjacency of the salience network to the AMN in the cortex 21 , striatum 57 and red nucleus 134 hints at the possibility that its allostatic salience signals could bias adjacent action-mode processes and vice versa 162,163 .”
Brodmann area 10: Collating, integrating and high level processing of nociception and pain
Peng, K., Steele, S. C., Becerra, L. R., & Borsook, D. (2017) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.11.004 · Cited by 164
“G, STS, auditory association cortex: Ban et al. (1991) (Monkey), Hackett et al. (1998) kris and Pandya (2009) (Human), Saleem et al. (2008) (Monkey).”
Corcoran, A. W., Pezzulo, G., & Hohwy, J. (2020) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09746-2 · Cited by 161
Interoception of breathing and its relationship with anxiety
Harrison, O. K., Köchli, L., Marino, S., Luechinger, R., Hennel, F., Brand, K., Hess, A. J., Frässle, S., Iglesias, S., Vinckier, F., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.045 · Cited by 163
Panksepp, J., Lane, R. D., Solms, M., & Smith, R. S. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.010 · Cited by 182
“This will involve (among others) the insular, somatosensory, and anterior cingulate cortices (Adolphs et al., 2000; Barrett and Simmons, 2015; Craig, 2009; Gu et al., 2013), and should proceed similarly to processing within other cortical sensory systems.”
Andrewes, D. G., & Jenkins, L. M. (2019) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-019-09398-4 · Cited by 169
Perry, A., Roberts, G. M. P., Mitchell, P. B., & Breakspear, M. J. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0267-2 · Cited by 152
Indovina, I., Riccelli, R., Chiarella, G., Petrolo, C., Augimeri, A., Giofrè, L., Lacquaniti, F., Staab, J. P., & Passamonti, L. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00334 · Cited by 140
“…more importantly, altered signaling between the PIVC and anterior insula, which is thought to integrate bottom-up interoceptive signals with top-down predictions to generate a body-centered awareness state (Craig, 2009; Gu et al., 2013), may impair production of a stable sense of self-motion.”
BackgroundAn asymmetric inhibition model of hemispheric differences in emotional processing
Grimshaw, G. M., & Carmel, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00489 · Cited by 143
Self as Object: Emerging Trends in Self Research
Sui, J., & Gu, X. (2017) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.09.002 · Cited by 139
Self-citationThe neural systems of emotion regulation and abnormalities in major depressive disorder
Park, C., Rosenblat, J. D., Lee, Y. L., Pan, Z., Cao, B., Iacobucci, M., & McIntyre, R. S. (2019) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.04.002 · Cited by 142
An insular view of the social decision-making network
Rogers-Carter, M. M., & Christianson, J. P. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.005 · Cited by 121
“, 2012), social motivation of others (Schreuders, 2018) and emotional awareness (Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundCentral fatigue theory and endurance exercise: Toward an interoceptive model
McMorris, T., Barwood, M. J., & Corbett, J. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.024 · Cited by 143
“The AIC compares the interoceptive feedback with the top-down predictions of interoceptive state, which it received from the DLPFC, in order to generate a current awareness state (Gu et al., 2013).”
An Appraisal-Driven Componential Approach to the Emotional Brain
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073918765653 · Cited by 154
Fibromyalgia Is Associated with Decreased Connectivity Between Pain- and Sensorimotor Brain Areas
Flodin, P., Martinsen, S., Löfgren, M., Bilevičiūtė-Ljungar, I., Kosek, E., & Fransson, P. (2014) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2014.0274 · Cited by 124
“The anterior insula has been implicated in a wide range of behaviors and is proposed to have a pivotal role for the neuronal representation of interoception (Craig, 2009) by integrating stimulus-driven and topdown driven information (Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundTaylor, P., Hobbs, J. N., Burroni, J., & Siegelmann, H. T. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep18112 · Cited by 125
Hogeveen, J., & Grafman, J. H. (2021) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822290-4.00004-9 · Cited by 157
“aINS is therefore well-situated to contribute to emotional awareness by receiving ascending interoceptive inputs and communicating with structures encoding higher-order representations of goals, attention, and motor plans (namely, vlPFC and pACC; (Medford and Critchley, 2010; Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAcquired alexithymia following damage to the anterior insula
Hogeveen, J., Bird, G., Chau, A., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.021 · Cited by 116
“Recent theoretical work suggests that alexithymia might be the result of impaired “interoception,” referring to one's sensitivity to the internal state of one's own body (Gu et al., 2013; Quattrocki and Friston, 2014; Seth, 2013).”
Autonomic and brain responses associated with empathy deficits in autism spectrum disorder
Gu, X., Eilam‐Stock, T., Zhou, T., Anagnostou, E., Kolevzon, A., Soorya, L., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22840 · Cited by 110
“The AIC is a critical cortical center in the interoceptive system which processes information from the body and exerts autonomic control [Craig, 2009; Craig, 2011; Critchley and Harrison, 2013; Gu et al., 2013a].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationUnconscious emotion: A cognitive neuroscientific perspective
Smith, R. S., & Lane, R. D. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.013 · Cited by 118
Acute biphasic effects of ayahuasca.
Schenberg, E. E., Alexandre, J. F. M., Filev, R., Cravo, A. M., Sato, J. R., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Yonamine, M., Waguespack, M., Lomnicka, I., Barker, S. A., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137202 · Cited by 111
“interoceptive and affective states [90] and emotional awareness [93].”
BackgroundKang, S.-G., Na, K.-S., Choi, J.-W., Kim, J.-H., Son, Y.-D., & Lee, Y. J. (2017) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.029 · Cited by 110
“The insular cortex is thought to be involved in consciousness, homeostatic regulation, motor control, emotion, and cognitive functioning (Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundFeinstein, J. S., Khalsa, S. S., Salomons, T. V., Prkachin, K. M., Frey-Law, L. A., Lee, J. E., Tranel, D., & Rudrauf, D. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0986-3 · Cited by 108
“This is an important point since several investigators have recently claimed that the anterior insula is the necessary substrate underlying all forms of emotional awareness (Craig 2009; Gu et al. 2013).”
McMorris, T. (2021) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.10.005 · Cited by 120
An insula hierarchical network architecture for active interoceptive inference
Fermin, A. S. R., Friston, K., & Yamawaki, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.220226 · Cited by 101
“This convergence of cortical and interoceptive information upon the insular cortex has led to influential hypotheses concerning its potential roles in interoceptive prediction [14], information integration for awareness [20,21], emotional awareness [22], interoceptive inference and emotion [23,24] and error-based lear…”
BackgroundSelf-citationInteroceptive inference: homeostasis and decision-making
Gu, X., & FitzGerald, T. H. B. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.001 · Cited by 108
Self-citationLan, M. J., Chhetry, B. T., Liston, C., Mann, J. J., & Dubin, M. (2016) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.011 · Cited by 96
“The anterior insula becomes actively engaged during emotional awareness, or conscious experience of emotion [50, 51].”
BackgroundMalejko, K., Abler, B., Plener, P. L., & Straub, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00085 · Cited by 98
“This can be interpreted as a correlate of reduced alertness and hyperarousal with traumatic and other emotional stimuli after treatment (55).”
BackgroundChanges in mental state and behaviour in Huntington's disease
Eddy, C. M., Parkinson, E. G., & Rickards, H. E. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30144-4 · Cited by 107
Neural Basis of Emotional Decision Making in Trait Anxiety
Xu, P., Gu, R., Broster, L. S., Wu, R., Dam, N. T. V., Jiang, Y., Fan, J., & Luo, Y. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1253-13.2013 · Cited by 96
“The insula is critical for the representation of interoceptive information (Paulus and Stein, 2006; Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe new measures of interoceptive accuracy: A systematic review and assessment
Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., Walentynowicz, M., & Corneille, O. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105388 · Cited by 122
Anterior insular cortex is a bottleneck of cognitive control
Wu, T., Wang, X., Wu, Q., Spagna, A., Yang, J., Yuan, C., Wu, Y., Gao, Z., Hof, P. R., & Fan, J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.042 · Cited by 104
“, 2004), and re-represents the vast information to generate higher-level abstract and subjective information that are considered as “thoughts”, “feelings”, and “awareness” (Brass and Haggard, 2010; Craig, 2009, 2011; Gu et al., 2013; Nelson et al., 2010; Singer et al., 2009).”
Self-citationGu, X., Wang, X., Hula, A., Wang, S., Xu, S., Lohrenz, T. M., Knight, R. T., Gao, Z., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2906-14.2015 · Cited by 92
“Physiological signals and feelings arising from the body are an essential part of cognition and decision-making (Damasio, 1996; Gu et al., 2013a; Gu and FitzGerald, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIcenhour, A., Witt, S. T., Elsenbruch, S., Lowén, M., Engström, M., Tillisch, K., Mayer, E. A., & Walter, S. (2017) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.001 · Cited by 92
“This result is interesting given that both amygdala and dorsal anterior insula serve as key hubs in the integration of interoceptive signals with emotional and cognitive aspects (Craig, 2009; Etkin and Wager, 2007; Gu et al., 2013; Neugebauer, 2015).”
A human colliculus-pulvinar-amygdala pathway encodes negative emotion
Kragel, P. A., Čeko, M., Theriault, J. E., Chen, D., Satpute, A. B., Wald, L. L., Lindquist, M. A., Barrett, L. F., & Wager, T. D. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.001 · Cited by 101
“…variables, including social and contextual factors, and are less influenced by individual differences in introspection and self-report, which are likely mediated by other brain systems including insular cortices and the default network (Chang et al., 2013; Gu et al., 2013; Kleckner et al., 2017).”
BackgroundHyett, M. P., Breakspear, M. J., Friston, K. J., Guo, C. C., & Parker, G. B. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2490 · Cited by 88
Self-citationKrach, S., Kamp‐Becker, I., Einhäuser, W., Sommer, J., Frässle, S., Jansen, A., Rademacher, L., Müller‐Pinzler, L., Gazzola, V., & Paulus, F. M. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22949 · Cited by 87
“This network, and specifically the AIC, provides a salient representation of one’s own bodily states and has been suggested to be a correlate of one’s conscious experience of emotion [Gu et al., 2013].”
BackgroundFrodl, T., Szyf, M., Carballedo, A., Ly, V., Dymov, S., Vaisheva, F., Morris, D., Fahey, C., Meaney, J., Gill, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.140180 · Cited by 86
Heart evoked potential triggers brain responses to natural affective scenes: A preliminary study
Couto, B., Adolfi, F., Velasquez, M., Mesow, M., Feinstein, J., Canales-Johnson, A., Mikulan, E., Martínez-Pernía, D., Bekinschtein, T., Sigman, M., et al. (2015) · Autonomic Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2015.06.006 · Cited by 86
Cognitive Fatigue Effects on Physical Performance: The Role of Interoception
McMorris, T. (2020) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01320-w · Cited by 95
Nam, K. W., Castellanos, N. P., Simmons, A., Froudist‐Walsh, S., Allin, M. P. G., Walshe, M., Murray, R. M., Evans, A. C., Muehlboeck, J., & Nosarti, C. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.015 · Cited by 86
“Similarly, cortical maturational delays in insula, which has been described as critical for emotional awareness (Gu et al., 2013) may explain poor social competence described in VPT adolescents (Healy et al.”
BackgroundA historical review of investigations on laterality of emotions in the human brain
Gainotti, G. (2018) · Journal of the History of the Neurosciences · doi:10.1080/0964704x.2018.1524683 · Cited by 90
“on the perception of bodily reactions to emotion-provoking objects and the cognitive interpretation of these interoceptive informations (Craig, 2009, 2010; Gu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAbnormal autonomic and associated brain activities during rest in autism spectrum disorder
Eilam‐Stock, T., Xu, P., Cao, M., Gu, X., Dam, N. T. V., Anagnostou, E. A., Kolevzon, A. L., Soorya, L. V., Park, Y., Siller, M., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt294 · Cited by 88
“…the anterior insular cortex, a brain region involved in interoceptive awareness (Craig, 2002, 2009; Critchley et al., 2002; Pollatos et al., 2007; Gu et al., 2013), and with the medial prefrontal cortex, which is implicated in self-referential processing (Craik et al., 1999; Kelley et al., 2002;…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKatzman, M., & Sternat, T. (2016) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s111818 · Cited by 83
“45 Emotional responses to stressful stimuli are partly mediated by the reciprocal connections of the amygdala, the thalamus, and the hippocampus.”
Hoemann, K., Nielson, C., Yuen, A., Gurera, J. W., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000327 · Cited by 83
McLennan, K. M., Miller, A. L., Costa, E. D., Stucke, D., Corke, M. J., Broom, D. M., & Leach, M. C. (2019) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2019.06.001 · Cited by 90
Wu, Q., Chang, C., Xi, S., Huang, I., Liu, Z., Juan, C.-H., Wu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22919 · Cited by 83
“To demonstrate the involvement of any brain region in the integration of multiple mental processes, two criteria need to be met: (1) participation in each process [Asplund et al., 2010; Shomstein, 2012]; and (2) an interaction effect between operations [Gray et al., 2002; Gu et al., 2013].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWhen the brain does not adequately feel the body: Links between low resilience and interoception
Haase, L., Stewart, J. L., Youssef, B., May, A. C., Isakovic, S., Simmons, A. N., Johnson, D. C., Potterat, E. G., & Paulus, M. P. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.004 · Cited by 79
Yao, S., Becker, B., Geng, Y., Zhao, Z., Xu, X., Zhao, W., Ren, P., & Kendrick, K. M. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.035 · Cited by 75
“These AI-prefrontal circuits play a central role in emotional processing, particularly salience detection (Uddin, 2015) and emotional awareness (Gu et al., 2013), and promote flexible behavioral adaption, particularly via emotion regulation (Ochsner et al.”
BackgroundRogers-Carter, M. M., Djerdjaj, A., Gribbons, K. B., Varela, J. A., & Christianson, J. P. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0316-19.2019 · Cited by 79
“, 2014; Gogolla, 2017) and is reciprocally connected to the extended amygdala (Shi and Cassell, 1998), which may underlie its known role in human emotional recognition (Adolphs et al., 2003; Gu et al., 2013; Terasawa et al., 2015).”
BackgroundFeel the Time. Time Perception as a Function of Interoceptive Processing
Lernia, D. D., Serino, S., Pezzulo, G., Pedroli, E., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00074 · Cited by 86
“…cortex (AIC) receives afferent inputs from small diameter sensory fibers through the lamina I spinothalamocortical pathway, which carries fundamental information from all the tissues of the body (Craig, 2002, 2003, 2009; Gu et al., 2013; Gu and FitzGerald, 2014) creating interoceptive perceptions.”
BackgroundFilippetti, M. L., & Manos Tsakiris, A. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.002 · Cited by 74
Owens, A. P., Friston, K. J., Low, D. A., Mathias, C. J., & Critchley, H. (2018) · Autonomic Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2018.01.001 · Cited by 84
Self-citationMulti-Feature Based Network Revealing the Structural Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Zheng, W., Eilam‐Stock, T., Wu, T., Spagna, A., Chen, C., Hu, B., & Fan, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890597 · Cited by 77
“Specifically, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, insula, and precuneus are key regions for socio-emotional processing [73-78], and prefrontal cortex is also associated with language processing [79, 80] and cognitive control [67, 81, 82]; the V1 and V4 areas belong to the visual system [83, 84]; and PMC is the primary…”
BackgroundSelf-citationStructure of the alexithymic brain: A parametric coordinate-based meta-analysis
Xu, P., Opmeer, E. M., van Tol, M., Goerlich, K. S., & Aleman, A. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.004 · Cited by 83
Brain responses to social norms: Meta‐analyses of f MRI studies
Zinchenko, O. O., & Arsalidou, M. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23895 · Cited by 74
Nave, K., Deane, G., Miller, M., & Clark, A. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1542 · Cited by 103
Ecstatic Epileptic Seizures: A Glimpse into the Multiple Roles of the Insula
Gschwind, M., & Picard, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00021 · Cited by 78
“Euphoric emotions have also been provoked by stimulation of the inferior temporal gyrus, temporal pole, amygdala, inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and supplementary motor area, with a predominance in the left hemisphere (Guillory and Bujarski, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Role of Language in Alexithymia: Moving Towards a Multiroute Model of Alexithymia
Hobson, H., Brewer, R., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2019) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919838528 · Cited by 82
Luo, Y., Eickhoff, S. B., Hétu, S., & Feng, C. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23854 · Cited by 82
“Likewise, the AI has also been identified in a variety of tasks associated with cognition, emotion or the interaction between them [Gu et al., 2012, 2013a,b; Fan et al., 2011].”
BackgroundAttachment, Mentalizing and Trauma: Then (1992) and Now (2022)
Fonagy, P., Campbell, C., & Luyten, P. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13030459 · Cited by 104
Attenuated sensitivity to the emotions of others by insular lesion
Terasawa, Y., Kurosaki, Y., Ibata, Y., Moriguchi, Y., & Umeda, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01314 · Cited by 78
“Anterior insular activation is also found when participants are aware of their internal bodily state (Evans et al., 2002; Critchley et al., 2004; Hamaguchi et al., 2004).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the links between vestibular and limbic systems regulating emotions
Mukkadan, J., Rajagopalan, A., Jinu, K., Sailesh, K., Mishra, S., & Reddy, U. (2017) · Journal of Natural Science Biology and Medicine · doi:10.4103/0976-9668.198350 · Cited by 72
“[45-49] Anatomical, physiological, and chemical-based vestibular projections exist to anterior insula, adjacent inferior frontal gyrus, and ACC, which has a regulatory role on interoceptive inputs necessary for physiology of emotions.[50-54]”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, X., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gu, Xiaosi
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-23
- Volume
- 521
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3371-3388
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC3999437
- OpenAlex
- W1533496174
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 209
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- anterior insula, emotional awareness, empathy, anterior cingulate cortex, interoception, top-down prediction, autonomic reflexes, functional dissociation
- MeSH terms
- Affective Symptoms, Animals, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Consciousness, Emotions, Empathy, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review