Cited by 8Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCOVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The effects of the Unified Protocol and Unified Protocol skills on loneliness in the COVID‐19 pandemic

Open access
Southward, Matthew W., Terrill, Douglas R., Sauer‐Zavala, Shannon·2022·Depression and Anxiety

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background Loneliness is a significant public health concern with no established first-line intervention although modular, transdiagnostic, cognitive-behavioral interventions, such as the Unified Protocol (UP), are promising candidates. The UP contains skill modules to target anxiety, depression, and related conditions, although it is unclear if the UP can reduce loneliness and if UP skill use contributes to these reductions. Methods Using data from the first-stage randomization of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, we tested whether the UP led to reductions in loneliness and whether specific dimensions of UP skill use predicted session-to-session changes in loneliness. Participants (N = 70; Mage = 33.74, 67% female, 74% white) completed six sessions of core UP modules, reporting how frequently they felt lonely and used UP skills before each session. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we examined the trajectory of change in loneliness and disaggregated between- from within-person variability to test session-to-session effects of skill use. Results Loneliness significantly decreased during treatment with the UP. Using more UP skills than one's personal average, but not frequency of skill use, predicted session-to-session decreases in loneliness. Conclusions Therapists may be encouraged to guide patients toward using a large quantity of different skills to specifically address loneliness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.23297

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary data show that the UP during the pandemic improved loneliness, anxiety, and emotion regulation.

    “Preliminary data on the efficacy of the UP during the pandemic is encouraging as it has demonstrated improvements in many difficulties, including loneliness, anxiety, and emotion regulation (Ferreres-Galán et al., 2022;Southward et al., 2022;Yan et al., 2022).”

    From RESILIENCE, COPING, AND THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ACROSS THE GLOBE – AN UPDATE: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? (2023) · cites this paper as Southward et al., 2022

    The Results report decreased loneliness during UP treatment in the pandemic, and Methods §5.2 says the UP reduced anxiety in the current sample, citing the parent trial. Results §6.1 also reports increased use of UP skills, but does not establish improved emotion regulation as a measured outcome. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barlow, D. H. , Sauer‐Zavala, S. , Farchione, T. J. , Latin, H. , Ellard, K. K. , Bullis, J. R. , Bentley, K. H. , Boettcher, H. T. , & Cassiello‐Robbins, C. (2018). Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Patient workbook (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Southward, M. W., Terrill, D. R., & Sauer‐Zavala, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Department of Psychology University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
Corresponding author
Southward, Matthew W.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-13
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
913-921
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W4308957029
Cited by
8
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH126211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
loneliness, Unified Protocol, skill utilization, COVID-19 pandemic, within-person variability, loneliness trajectories, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review