Cited by 232Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Brief periods of socialization and later behavior in the rat

Einon, Dorothy F., Morgan, Michael J., Kibbler, Christopher C.·1978·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Juvenile rats were allowed short daily periods of social contact to see if this would reduce the known effects of isolation rearing upon habituation of locomotor activity and object contact in the open field. Animals totally deprived of social experience (ISOL) were slower to habituate than animals living in small social groups (SOC). Rats allowed 1 hr of social contact (partial isolates, PI), but living otherwise in isolation, were intermediate between ISOL and SOC animals. In further experiments the quality of social interactions in the daily period was altered by drugging one of the partners, either with amphetamine or with chlorpormazine. In later tests in the open field, the rats that had interacted with amphetamine‐injected or chlorpromazine‐injected partners differed from PI animals in the direction of resembling complete isolates (ISOL); this was particularly true of those paired with amphetamine animals. Observation revealed that injection of 1 of the partners considerably altered social interactions in the pair. A further test showed that 1 hr of contact a day considerably alleviated the deleterious effects of isolation rearing upon response reversal. We conclude that normal development in the rat may depend upon the flexibility of behavior encouraged by the early social situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.420110305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einon, D. F., Morgan, M. J., & Kibbler, C. C.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Einon, Dorothy F.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2165484980
Cited by
232
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
socialization, isolation rearing, early social experience, amphetamine, chlorpromazine, response reversal, behavioral flexibility, young rats, social deprivation
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Motor Activity, Social Behavior, Social Isolation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review