Cited by 74Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and Diversity

Stereotype threat: the moderating role of locus of control beliefs

Cadinu, Mara, Maass, Anne, Lombardo, Mery, Frigerio, Sara·2006·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to test the moderating role of Locus of Control beliefs on performance deficits typically associated with stereotype threat. The results from Experiment 1 were consistent with predictions. First, consistent with the Stereotype Threat model, participants showed a decrease in performance when the task was perceived as a potential test of the in-group's negative stereotype (lacking logical mathematical intelligence in the case of women and lacking social intelligence in the case of men). Most important, participants' Locus of Control beliefs were found to moderate participants' vulnerability to stereotype threat: individuals with an Internal Locus of Control, although generally performing better, showed a sharper decrease in the stereotype threat condition compared to individuals with External Locus of Control beliefs. Experiment 2 replicated the results from Experiment 1. Findings are discussed in relation to the psychological characteristics of Internal Locus of Control that may render individuals more vulnerable to the negative effects of stereotype threat. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.303

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stereotype threat effects are most pronounced in those for whom performance in the domain is highly important and self-relevant.

    “Other research shows that stereotype threat effects are most pronounced in those for whom performance in the domain is highly important and self-relevant (Aronson, et al., 1998;Cadinu, Maass, Frigerio, Impagliazzo, & Latinotti, 2003;Cadinu, Maass, Lombardo, & Frigerio 2006).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Cadinu, Maass, Lombardo, & Frigerio 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Lombardo, M., & Frigerio, S.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Cadinu, Mara
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
183-197
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W1998144649
Cited by
74
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
stereotype threat, locus of control, internal locus of control, external locus of control, performance deficits, gender stereotypes, mathematical ability, social intelligence, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review