Cited by 243Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Stereotype Threat: Are Lower Status and History of Stigmatization Preconditions of Stereotype Threat?

Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, Désert, Michel, Croizet, Jean-Claude, Darcis, Catherine·2000·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

This research extended stereotype-threat effects outside of the academic domain and to a nonstigmatized group. Female and male students performed three decision tasks: lexical, valence, and affective processing. Half of the participants were told that, in general, men are poorer performers than are women in affective processing tasks. No differences between conditions were observed for the lexical and valence tasks. By contrast, for the affective task, threatened men made significantly more errors than did participants in the other three conditions. More precisely, threatened men tended to accept as affective words that were not affective. This latter result suggests that threatened men decreased their threshold for affectivity “to prove” the inapplicability of the stereotype to themselves. Moreover, stereotype endorsement did not mediate the results. Identification with the affective domain, on the other hand, moderated the effect of stereotype threat. Discussion considers the consequences of these findings for everyday interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167200262002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research that creates new groups in the laboratory has found that merely being made aware that there is a negative stereotype about your group's ability can cause social identity threat and identity incompatibility perceptions and thus reduce performance on relevant tasks.

    “Furthermore, research that creates new groups in the laboratory has found that merely being made aware that there is a negative stereotype about your group's ability can cause social identity threat and identity incompatibility perceptions and thus reduce performance on relevant tasks (Leyens, Desert, Croizet, & Darcis, 2000;Steele, 1997).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Leyens, Desert, Croizet, & Darcis, 2000

  • Stereotype threat has been induced among men on emotional processing tasks by informing them that they have historically performed worse than women on those tasks.

    “and among men on emotional processing (but not other) tasks by merely informing them that they have historically performed worse than women on those tasks (Leyens et al., 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leyens, J.-P., Désert, M., Croizet, J.-C., & Darcis, C.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2000-11
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1189-1199
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2116334310
Cited by
243
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
36.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
stereotype threat, gender stereotypes, emotional processing, lexical decision, valence judgment, stereotype endorsement, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review