Cited by 35Algal biology and biofuel productionThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

ASI: Hydrothermal extraction and characterization of bio‐crude oils from wet chlorella sorokiniana and dunaliella tertiolecta

Reddy, Harvind K., Muppaneni, Tapaswy, Rastegary, Jalal, Shirazi, Saeid A., Ghassemi, Abbas, Deng, Shuguang·2013·Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy

Abstract

In this research, the potential of geothermal water as an alternative water source was tested for the production of algal bio‐fuels. Two algal species, Chlorella Sorokiniana and Dunaliella Tertiolecta were cultivated in a photo‐bioreactor with tap water and geothermal water. The freshly harvested wet algae samples were used to produce bio‐crude oil samples in a high pressure reactor under a hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) condition (300°C, 90 bar and solid loading of 9 wt %). Supernatant water obtained after harvesting was used in the HTL experiments. A thermogravimetric analyzer was used to determine the moisture and ash content of the algal biomass. It was observed that the bio‐crude oil yield could be higher than the lipid content in the algae. The GC‐MS analysis of biocrude oils showed the contribution of both lipids and proteins to the yield of biocrude. The highest bio‐crude oil yield of 30 wt % (of dry algae) was obtained with a Dunaliella Tertiolecta sample cultivated in a regular tap water medium. A similar amount of biocrude was achieved with a geothermal water medium. Using a calorie meter, the high heating values of bio‐crude oils were measured and these values ranged from 36 to 38 MJ/kg, which are close to that of crude petroleum oils. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 32: 910–915, 2013

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ep.11862

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy, H. K., Muppaneni, T., Rastegary, J., Shirazi, S. A., Ghassemi, A., & Deng, S.
Affiliations
New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Deng, Shuguang
Venue
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-17
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
910-915
ISSN
  • 1944-7442 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7450
OpenAlex
W2017819654
Cited by
35
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • New Mexico State University
  • U.S. Air Force
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Keywords
hydrothermal liquefaction, bio-crude oil, Chlorella sorokiniana, Dunaliella tertiolecta, geothermal water, algal biofuels, higher heating value, algal biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review