Altered inhibition-related frontolimbic connectivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background: Recent studies have shown that response inhibition is impaired in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder and their unaffected siblings, suggesting that these deficits may be considered a cognitive endophenotype of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Structural and functional neural correlates of altered response inhibition have been identified in patients and siblings. This study aims to examine the functional integrity of the response inhibition network in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder and their unaffected siblings. Methods: Forty‐one unmedicated patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder, 17 of their unaffected siblings and 37 healthy controls performed a stop signal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psycho‐physiological interaction analysis was used to examine functional connectivity between the following regions of interest: the bilateral inferior frontal gyri, presupplementary motor area, subthalamic nuclei, inferior parietal lobes, anterior cingulate cortex, and amygdala. We then used dynamic causal modeling to investigate the directionality of the networks involved. Results: Patients, and to a lesser extent also their unaffected siblings, show altered connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and the amygdala during response inhibition. The follow‐up dynamic causal modeling suggests a bottom‐up influence of the amygdala on the inferior frontal gyrus in healthy controls, whereas processing occurs top‐down in patients with obsessive–compulsive, and in both directions in siblings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that amygdala activation in obsessive–compulsive disorder interferes differently with the task‐related recruitment of the inhibition network, underscoring the role of limbic disturbances in cognitive dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4064–4075, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 57 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Post-hoc tests showed stronger negative coupling between the left IFG and right amygdala in OCD patients than controls.
“Follow-up post-hoc tests showed increased negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right amygdala in OCD patients compared to controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dynamic causal modeling showed that the amygdala exerted a bottom-up influence on the inferior frontal gyrus during task performance in healthy controls and unaffected siblings.
“Results of the DCM analysis indicated that the amygdala had a bottom-up effect on the IFG during task performance in healthy controls and siblings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In all three groups, the models with the highest exceedance probability received input in the bilateral IFG.
“In all three participant groups, models with the highest exceedance probability received input in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (see Supporting Information Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The apparent performance-enhancing effect of the amygdala on the inferior frontal gyrus was absent in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“This putative performance-enhancing effect of the amygdala on the IFG appears to be absent in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study found no significant correlations between stop-signal reaction time and inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity in patients or siblings.
“As we did not find significant correlations between SSRT and IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients or siblings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Task-related processing in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder occurred top-down.
“as task-related processing occurred top-down in this group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Group differences in inhibition-related connectivity were found between the left IFG and small clusters in the bilateral amygdala.
“Inhibition-related connectivity group differences were found between the left IFG and small clusters in the bilateral amygdala (see Table I and Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In OCD patients, the model with the highest exceedance probability had a top-down connection from the left IFG to the left amygdala.
“In patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, the model with the highest exceedance probability was a model that had a top-down connection from the left IFG to the left amygdala (see Supporting Information Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: It was unclear from previous research whether input was first received by the amygdala or the inferior frontal gyrus or by both simultaneously.
- Findingown data
Abnormal inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity during response inhibition was also present in unaffected siblings of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder at a lenient statistical threshold.
“Abnormal IFG-amygdala connectivity during response inhibition was also seen in unaffected siblings of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder at a lenient statistical threshold (see Supporting Information)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study found no group differences in the modulatory effect of successful stop and successful go on IFG-amygdala connection strength.
“Despite finding different winning models in each group in the BMS analysis, we were unable to find group differences in the modulatory effect of SS and SG on the strength of IFG-amygdala connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During response inhibition, negative coupling was observed between all seed regions in all three groups.
“During response inhibition, negative coupling between all seed regions was observed in the three groups (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The connection strength between the left amygdala and left IFG was lower in siblings than in patients (96% of samples) and controls (95%).
“The strength of the connection between the left amygdala and left IFG was reduced in siblings compared to patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (in 96% of samples) and healthy controls (in 95% of all samples).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These PPI results were not related to SSRT.
“The abovementioned results were not related to SSRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At a lenient uncorrected threshold of P < 0.001, negative coupling between the left IFG and amygdala was stronger in both OCD patients and siblings than controls.
“When results were examined at a more lenient P-value (without controlling for multiple comparisons; P < 0.001) clusters were larger and the negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and amygdala was stronger in both OCD patients and siblings compared to controls (see Supporting Information Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no group difference in connection strength during the successful stop and successful go task conditions.
“There was no difference in connection strength between subject groups during the task conditions (successful stop and successful go).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The relationship in siblings was only seen at a trend level after removal of an outlier (P 5 0.074).
“The relationship in siblings was only seen at a trend-level after removal of an outlier (P 5 0.074).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left amygdala is present in OCD patients and siblings but absent in healthy controls.
“Negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left amygdala is seen in OCD patients and siblings, but is absent in healthy controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Connectivity strength from the left amygdala to the left inferior frontal gyrus, which differed between groups in the BMA per-group analysis, showed a negative correlation with stop-signal reaction time in healthy controls (r 5 20.492, P 5 0.03).
“The connectivity strength from the left amygdala to the left IFG, which differed between groups in the BMA per group analysis, showed a negative correlation with SSRT in healthy controls (r 5 20.492, P 5 0.03).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations were observed between activation of the left pre-supplementary motor area and connectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and right amygdala in patients and siblings.
“Correlations between activation of the left pre-SMA and the connectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and right amygdala in patients (A) and siblings (B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right amygdala is present in OCD patients and siblings but absent in healthy controls.
“Negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right amygdala is seen in OCD patients and siblings, but is absent in healthy controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Regions showing group differences in functional connectivity with the left inferior frontal gyrus during successful response inhibition (successful stop > successful go) included the left and right amygdala (P 5 0.001, uncorrected).
“Regions that show group differences in functional connectivity with the left inferior frontal gyrus during successful response inhibition (successful stop > successful go), including the left and right amygdala (P 5 0.001, uncorrected).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Multiple studies have found structural deficits in frontostriatal regions tied to response inhibition, including the IFG, in OCD patients.
“Several studies in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder have observed structural deficits in frontostriatal regions associated with response inhibition, including the IFG [De Wit et al., 2014].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Wit et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In healthy people, stop signal task performance depends on indirect and hyperdirect CSTC pathways.
“Neuroimaging studies have shown that performance of the stop signal task is dependent on indirect and hyperdirect CSTC pathways in healthy subjects [Aron, 2011;Aron and Poldrack, 2006;Chambers et al., 2009].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Aron, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Aron and Poldrack, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chambers et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Altered left IFG-amygdala connectivity interferes with task-related recruitment of the inhibition network.
“These findings suggests that altered left IFG-amygdala connectivity interferes with taskrelated activation of the inhibition network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The abnormal inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity in unaffected siblings suggests that it is related to genetic susceptibility to obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“which suggests that it is related to the genetic susceptibility for obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A bottom-up influence of the amygdala on the prefrontal cortex may improve attention to the stop signal and speed during inhibitory performance.
“Thus, a bottom-up effect of the amygdala on the prefrontal cortex may enhance attention to the stop signal and speed during inhibitory performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
DCM BMS results indicate altered IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients and siblings during both successful stop and successful go trials.
“Follow-up DCM BMS analysis showed different winning models in each subject group, indicative of altered IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients and siblings during both successful stop and successful go trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Decreased general connection strength between the left amygdala and left IFG in siblings suggests a general change in IFG-amygdala connectivity in this group.
“We did observe decreased general connection strength in siblings between the left amygdala and the left IFG.This seems to suggest a general change in IFG-amygdala connectivity in this group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Because DCM was performed on a subset of participants, the analysis may have had insufficient power to detect task-condition modulatory effects.
“However, as the DCM analysis was performed on a subset of participants, we may have had insufficient power to show task-condition modulatory effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
A limitation of the PPI analysis was the use of large regions of interest (10 mm) that were similar across all subjects, rather than smaller subject-specific regions of interest.
“A limitation of our PPI analysis is the use of large regions of interest (10 mm) that were similar across all subjects, instead of the use of smaller subject-specific regions of interest, like those needed for [Stephan et al., 2010] and used in the DCM analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Passamonti et al. found comparable PPI results using both large subject-specific regions of interest and a region of interest that was similar across all subjects.
“Additionally, Passamonti et al. [2008] found comparable PPI results using both large subject-specific regions of interest and a region of interest that was similar across all subjects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Passamonti et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The present study included medication-free subjects.
“Strengths of the present study are the inclusion of medication-free subjects and use of two complementary techniques to assess functional connectivity (PPI and DCM).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In a post hoc analysis, the original PPI effects were replicated in the smaller sample included in the DCM analysis, in the left hemisphere, at a more lenient threshold.
“Additionally, in a post hoc analysis (data not shown), we were able to replicate the original PPI effects in the smaller sample of subjects included in the DCM analysis, in the left hemisphere (yet at a more lenient threshold).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In the DCM analysis, groups were still matched for demographic and clinical variables.
“However, in our DCM analysis groups were still matched for demographic and clinical variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 22
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean connection strength was positive in patients and controls but negative in siblings.
“The mean connection strength was positive in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and controls, but was negative in siblings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBMS did not identify a winning model in healthy controls; several models with bottom-up connections had equally high exceedance probabilities.
“Results of the BMS did not reveal a winning model in the healthy control group, as the exceedance probabilities for multiple models that included bottom-up connections were equally high (see Supporting Information Table S3 and Fig. S1), indicating multiple winning models in this group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSSRT was significantly longer in patients than controls, while siblings did not differ from either group.
“As reported previously [de Wit et al., 2012], SSRT was significantly increased in patients compared to controls (t 5 2.07, P 5 0.04), whereas siblings did not differ in SSRT from both patients and controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Wit et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn siblings, the same relationship appeared (r = -0.650, P = 0.005), but after removing an outlier it was only trend-level (r = -0.459, P = 0.074).
“The relationship between IFG-amygdala connectivity and pre-SMA activity was also seen in siblings (r 5 20.650, P 5 0.005), but was after removal of an outlier only seen at trend-level (r 5 20.459, P 5 0.074).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn siblings, the winning model had bidirectional IFG-amygdala connections in both hemispheres (exceedance probability 28%); the patients' winning model was only slightly worse in siblings (21%).
“In siblings, the winning model included bidirectional connections between the IFG and amygdala in both hemispheres (see Supporting Information Fig S1) and had an exceedance probability of 28%.However, the winning model for patients (i.e., top-down connection in the left hemisphere) was only slightly worse in siblings, with an exceedance probability of 21%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe IFG and pre-SMA are essential for response inhibition and appear to initiate the neural stop signal.
“The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) are crucial for response inhibition [Chambers et al., 2006;Chen et al., 2009] and appear to initiate the neural stop signal [Aron, 2011].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chambers et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Aron, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors previously reported reduced activation in the right inferior parietal cortex and right IFG in OCD patients during a response inhibition task.
“We have also previously reported decreased activation of the right inferior parietal and right IFG in OCD patients during performance of a response inhibition task [ de Wit et al., 2012].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Wit et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationNeurobiological models of OCD implicate dysfunction in frontal-striatal, frontoparietal, and frontolimbic circuits in the disorder's etiology.
“Current neurobiological models implicate dysfunction of frontal-striatal, frontoparietal and frontolimbic circuits in the etiology of this disorder [Milad and Rauch, 2012;van den Heuvel et al., in press].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Milad and Rauch, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van den Heuvel et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe authors previously found greater task-related left pre-SMA activation in OCD patients and their siblings, suggesting compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivity may be an endophenotype of OCD.
“We additionally found increased task-related activation of the left pre-SMA in OCD patients and their siblings, indicating that compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivity during response inhibition may be an endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Wit et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatients with OCD exhibit impaired response inhibition, shown by more commission errors on go/no-go tasks and longer stop signal reaction times on the stop signal task.
“Studies have shown response inhibition deficits in patients with this disorder, as indicated by increased commission errors during go-no go task performance [Bannon et al., 2002] and increased stop signal reaction times (SSRT) in the stop signal task [Chamberlain et al., 2006].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bannon et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chamberlain et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors such as compulsions.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThose models posit an imbalance among affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor CSTC circuits, plus altered connectivity linking these circuits with the amygdala.
“The models propose an imbalance between interacting affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor corticostriato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits, and altered connectivity between these circuits and the amygdala [Milad and Rauch, 2012;van den Heuvel et al., in press].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Milad and Rauch, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van den Heuvel et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnaffected siblings of OCD patients also show response inhibition deficits, which suggests the impairment is state-independent and supports it as a neurocognitive endophenotype of OCD.
“Deficits in response inhibition have also been observed in unaffected siblings of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, suggesting that the response inhibition impairment is state-independent and strengthening the notion of impaired response inhibition as a neurocognitive endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder [Chamberlain et al., 2007].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chamberlain et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn healthy people, the amygdala contributes to motor inhibition triggered by threat.
“Studies in healthy samples showed that the amygdala plays a role in motor inhibition in response to threat [Sagaspe et al., 2011]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagaspe et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNo correction for multiple comparisons was applied in the DCM analyses, to reduce the risk of type-2 errors.
“To also reduce the risk for type-2 errors, we used no correction for multiple comparisons in the DCM analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work has suggested that the amygdala may mediate detection of salient or goal-relevant stimuli, or vigilance to uncertain events such as the stop signal.
“This is in line with previous suggestions that detection of salient or goalrelevant stimuli (in this case the stop signal) or vigilance in response to uncertain events (the presentation of the stop signal) may be mediated by the amygdala”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Davis and Whalen, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schaefer et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schaefer and Gray, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe IFG is essential for response inhibition and participates in detecting the stop signal and generating inhibitory output.
“The inferior frontal gyrus is crucial for response inhibition [Chambers et al., 2006] and is involved in both the detection of the stop signal and generation of inhibitory output [Chikazoe et al., 2009;Levy and Wagner, 2011].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chambers et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chikazoe et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Levy and Wagner, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex during processing of emotional stimuli.
“and increased connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex [Rasch et al., 2010]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rasch et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn healthy people, the amygdala contributes to detecting behaviorally relevant or salient stimuli in cognitive tasks.
“and in the detection of behaviorally relevant or salient stimuli in other cognitive tasks [Kiehl et al., 2005;Ousdal et al., 2008].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kiehl et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ousdal et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningFor the PPI analysis, results were considered significant after multiple-testing correction at P < 0.0001723.
“For the PPI analysis, results survive correction for multiple testing if P 0.0001723.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the DCM subset, groups remained matched on demographic measures and performance, but included siblings were significantly younger than excluded siblings.
“Groups were still matched for demographic measures and performance, siblings included in the DCM analysis were significantly younger (mean age 33.2; standard deviation 10.87) than siblings not included in the DCM analysis (mean age 50.54; standard deviation 11.15) (t[15] 5 2.975, P 5 0.009, see Supporting Information Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased connectivity between the amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus during processing of emotional stimuli.
“and between the amygdala and IFG [Drabant et al., 2006] during processing of emotional stimuli.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Drabant et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased extracellular dopamine levels.
“Furthermore, the met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased extracellular dopamine levels [Lachman et al., 1996]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lachman et al., 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough many studies link inhibition to the right IFG, the left IFG also appears involved.
“Although many studies implicate the right IFG in inhibition, the left IFG seems also involved [Duann et al., 2009;Swick et al., 2008].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Duann et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Swick et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth right and left IFG have been found hypoactive during response inhibition in OCD patients, possibly reflecting reduced attention to the stop signal or impaired generation of the neural stop signal.
“Both the right IFG [Page et al., 2009;de Wit et al., 2012;Woolley et al., 2008] and left IFG [Maltby et al., 2005;Page et al., 2009] have been found to be hypoactive during response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which may reflect decreased attention allocation to the stop signal or an impairment in generating the neural stop signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Page et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites de Wit et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Woolley et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOver half of the patients met criteria for at least one additional axis-I disorder, but comorbid disorders were not associated with task performance or OCD severity.
“More than half of the patients also met criteria for one or more other axis-I disorders (54%), but the presence of comorbid disorders was not associated with task performance or obsessive-compulsive disorder severity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome studies have found increased amygdala activation in obsessive-compulsive disorder during decision making and processing of emotional faces or disease-relevant emotional stimuli.
“and increased amygdala activation during decision making and processing of emotional faces or disease-relevant emotional stimuli [Cardoner et al., 2011;Stern et al., 2013;van den Heuvel et al., 2004].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cardoner et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stern et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van den Heuvel et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies have shown altered brain activation in response to salient stimuli using oddball tasks in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“Previous studies strengthen this notion by showing altered brain activation in response to salient stimuli using oddball tasks in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Kim et al., 2003;Rubia et al., 2011].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rubia et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOCD patients had higher depression scores than controls.
“Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder scored higher on clinical measures of depression than controls (Montgomery-A ˚sberg Depression Rating Scale scores: patients: mean 11.5 (8.1); siblings: mean 1.9 (3.5); controls: mean 0.8 (1.0) (F[2,92] 5 0.26, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome studies have found structural abnormalities of the amygdala in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“Some studies, however, have observed structural abnormalities of the amygdala in obsessive-compulsive disorder [Kwon et al., 2003;Szeszko et al., 1999]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kwon et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szeszko et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies have shown that the limbic system, including the amygdala, is involved in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“system, including the amygdala [Admon et al., 2012;Cardoner et al., 2011;Milad and Rauch, 2012] in the disorder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Admon et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cardoner et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Milad and Rauch, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrior work has suggested that the amygdala may send modulatory signals to the cortex that affect attention allocation or cause behavioral adaptation.
“and that the amygdala may send modulatory signals to the cortex affecting attention allocation or causing behavioral adaptation [Davis and Whalen, 2001;Schaefer et al., 2006;Schaefer and Gray, 2007].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Davis and Whalen, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schaefer et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schaefer and Gray, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn OCD patients, resting-state connectivity is greater between the right middle cingulate cortex and right parahippocampal cortex, and between the right middle cingulate cortex and left caudate; middle cingulate-parahippocampal connectivity correlates negatively with SSRT.
“This group found greater connectivity between the right middle cingulate cortex and right parahippocampal cortex, and between the right middle cingulate cortex and left caudate at rest in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Connectivity between the middle cingulate cortex and the parahippocampal cortex correlated negatively with SSRT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious imaging genetics studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder showed that the dopamine receptor D2 polymorphism is associated with altered functional connectivity between the amygdala and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during emotional processing.
“Previous imaging genetics studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder showed that the dopamine receptor D2 polymorphism is associated with altered functional connectivity between the amygdala and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during emotional processing [Blasi et al., 2009].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blasi et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAltered IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients and siblings leads to inefficient frontal-striatal processing, producing compensatory task-related pre-SMA hyperactivation.
“We hypothesize that altered connectivity between the IFG and amygdala in patients and siblings leads to inefficient processing in frontal-striatal circuits, resulting in compensatory taskrelated hyperactivation of the pre-SMA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBoth the dopamine receptor D2 gene and the COMT gene have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder in several studies.
“Both abovementioned genes have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder in several studies [Denys et al., 2006;Karayiorgou et al., 1997;Schindler et al., 2000].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Denys et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Karayiorgou et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schindler et al., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA DCM study of the Stroop task found increased inhibition-related connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in OCD patients.
“Another study examined connectivity during performance of a related inhibition task, the Stroop task, using dynamic causal modeling and found increased inhibitionrelated connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Schl€ osser et al., 2010].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schl€ osser et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPolymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene affect fronto-limbic connectivity.
“Additionally, polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene affect fronto-limbic connectivity [Long et al., 2013;Surguladze et al., 2012]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Long et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Surguladze et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe participant groups were matched on age, gender, and educational level.
“To briefly summarize, participants were matched for age (patients: mean 38.6 y (standard deviation 9.8); siblings: mean 38.3 y (13.4); controls: mean 39.7 y (11.6); (F[2,92] =0.01, P 5 0.871), gender (patients: 21/41 males; siblings: 12/17 males; controls: 18/37 males); (v 2 5 2.4, P 5 0.297), and educational level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe present study used two complementary techniques, PPI and DCM, to assess functional connectivity.
“Strengths of the present study are the inclusion of medication-free subjects and use of two complementary techniques to assess functional connectivity (PPI and DCM).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPolymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
“and have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Lin, 2007].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings suggest that altered inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, and to a lesser extent in unaffected siblings, interferes with the task-related efficiency of the response inhibition network, resulting in compensatory pre-supplementary motor area hyperactivation.
“To conclude, our findings suggest that altered IFGamygdala connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, and to a lesser extent in their unaffected siblings, interferes with the task-related efficiency of the response inhibition network resulting in compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause DCM used subject-specific regions of interest, not all subjects from the PPI analysis could be included in the DCM analysis, which may warrant replication in a larger sample.
“Because of the use of subject-specific regions of interest in DCM, not all subjects in the PPI analysis could be included in our DCM analysis, which may warrant replication in a larger sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The specific pathways by which limbic regions including the amygdala influence cognitive functioning have not been identified.
“The specific pathways by which (para)limbic regions including the amygdala may influence cognitive functioning have yet to be identified.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No studies have focused on functional connectivity patterns during response inhibition in OCD patients.
“To date, no studies have focused on the functional connectivity patterns during response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors such as compulsions.
“Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors, such as the compulsions seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It was unclear from previous research whether input was first received by the amygdala or the inferior frontal gyrus or by both simultaneously.
“As it was unclear from previous research whether input was first received by the amygdala or the inferior frontal gyrus or by both regions simultaneously, we created a model space of models with all the possible inputs (to the IFG, to the amygdala or to both).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.
“The parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this study, no report had described altered amygdala connectivity during response inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.
“Altered connectivity of the amygdala during response inhibition performance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder has never been reported before.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dysfunction of the inhibition-related network in OCD patients and unaffected siblings seems to be explained at least partly by altered connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and the amygdala.
“Moreover, the reported dysfunction of the inhibition-related network in OCD patients and unaffected siblings seems to be explained, at least partly, by altered connectivity between the IFG and the amygdala (van Velzen et al., 2015) suggesting an important role for the limbic circuit in inhibitory impairment in OCD.”
From The role of habit in compulsivity (2016) · cites this paper as van Velzen et al., 2015
Cites
Maldjian, J., Laurienti, P., Kraft, R., & Burdette, J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,453 · see citing works
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583 · see citing works
Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 · Cited by 3,097 · see citing works
The amygdala: vigilance and emotion
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 · Cited by 2,882 · see citing works
The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Ruscio, A. M., Stein, D. J., Chiu, W. T., & Kessler, R. C. (2010) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.94 · Cited by 2,771 · see citing works
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590 · see citing works
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276 · see citing works
Lachman, H. M., Papolos, D. F., Saito, T., Yu, Y.-M., Szumlanski, C. L., & Weinshilboum, R. M. (1996) · Pharmacogenetics · doi:10.1097/00008571-199606000-00007 · Cited by 1,788 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The inferior frontal gyrus is crucial for response inhibition [Chambers et al., 2006] and is involved in both the detection of the stop signal and generation of inhibitory output [Chikazoe et al., 2009; Levy and Wagner, 2011].”
BackgroundAron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4682-05.2006 · Cited by 1,630 · see citing works
Bayesian model selection for group studies
Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Daunizeau, J., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025 · Cited by 1,423 · see citing works
Aron, A. R. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
Amygdalo‐cortical projections in the monkey ( <i>Macaca fascicularis</i> )
Amaral, D. G., & Price, J. L. (1984) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902300402 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience
Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control.
Logan, G. D., Zandt, T. V., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0035230 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., & Burdette, J. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.032 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Obsessive-compulsive disorder: beyond segregated cortico-striatal pathways
Milad, M. R., & Rauch, S. L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.003 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling
Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Moran, R. J., den Ouden, H. E. M., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.015 · Cited by 803 · see citing works
Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
Swick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, A. U. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-102 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Motor Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Trichotillomania
Chamberlain, S. R., Fineberg, N. A., Blackwell, A. D., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1282 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Levy, B. J., & Wagner, A. D. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Executive "Brake Failure" following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe
Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., Morris, A. P., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892906775990606 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe
Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., Morris, A. P., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.444 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Duann, J., Ide, J. S., Luo, X., & Li, C.-S. R. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1300-09.2009 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Chamberlain, S. R., Fineberg, N. A., Menzies, L. A., Blackwell, A. D., Bullmore, E. T., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.335 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Drabant, E. M., Hariri, A. R., Meyer‐Lindenberg, A., Muñoz, K. E., Mattay, V. S., Kolachana, B. S., Egan, M. F., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1396 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
van den Heuvel, O. A., Veltman, D. J., Groenewegen, H. J., Witter, M. P., Merkelbach, J. W., Cath, D. C., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., van Oppen, P., & van Dyck, R. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.8.922 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain circuitry of compulsivity
van den Heuvel, O. A., van Wingen, G., Soriano-Mas, C., Alonso, P., Chamberlain, S. R., Nakamae, T., Denys, D., Goudriaan, A. E., & Veltman, D. J. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.005 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationOrbital frontal and amygdala volume reductions in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Szeszko, P. R., Robinson, D., Alvir, J. M. J., Bilder, R. M., Lencz, T., Ashtari, M., Wu, H., & Bogerts, B. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.913 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Maltby, N., Tolin, D. F., Worhunsky, P., O'Keefe, T. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.041 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The descriptive epidemiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder
Fontenelle, L. F., Mendlowicz, M. V., & Versiani, M. (2006) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Karayiorgou, M., Altemus, M., Galke, B. L., Goldman, D., Murphy, D. L., Ott, J., & Gogos, J. A. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4572 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
de Wit, S. J., de Vries, F. E., van der Werf, Y. D., Cath, D. C., Heslenfeld, D. J., Veltman, E. M., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Veltman, D. J., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010073 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Dissociation in Right Inferior Frontal Cortex during Performance of Go/No-Go Task
Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Yamashita, K., Morimoto, H., Hirose, S., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn065 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
de Wit, S. J., Alonso, P., Schweren, L., Mataix-Cols, D., Lochner, C., Menchón, J. M., Stein, D. J., Fouche, J.-P., Soriano-Mas, C., Sato, J. R., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13040574 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationKiehl, K. A., Stevens, M. C. G., Laurens, K. R., Pearlson, G. D., Calhoun, V. D., & Liddle, P. F. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.035 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Response inhibition deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Bannon, S., Gonsalvez, C. J., Croft, R. J., & Boyce, P. M. (2002) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00104-x · Cited by 246 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Studies have shown response inhibition deficits in patients with this disorder, as indicated by increased commission errors during go-no go task performance [Bannon et al., 2002] and increased stop signal reaction times (SSRT) in the stop signal task [Chamberlain et al.”
BackgroundControl of prepotent responses by the superior medial frontal cortex
CHEN, C., Muggleton, N. G., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Juan, C.-H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.005 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
de Vries, F. E., de Wit, S. J., Cath, D. C., van der Werf, Y. D., van der Borden, V., van Rossum, T. B., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., van der Wee, N. J. A., Veltman, D. J., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.11.021 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain activation in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder during tasks of inhibitory control
Woolley, J., Heyman, I., Brammer, M., Frampton, I., McGuire, P. K., & Rubia, K. (2008) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.036558 · Cited by 162 · cited 8× · see citing works
“, 2008], and thalamus [Page et al., 2009; Woolley et al., 2008], although one study reported increased inhibition-related activation of these areas in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder [Maltby et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialFear and stop: A role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals
Sagaspe, P., Schwartz, S., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.027 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Common and Distinct Neural Correlates of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Mataix‐Cols, D., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2006) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2006.02.006 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of inhibitory control in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Page, L. A., Rubia, K., Deeley, Q., Daly, E., Toal, F., Mataix-Cols, D., Giampietro, V., Schmitz, N., & Murphy, D. G. M. (2009) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.05.002 · Cited by 147 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…have also reported decreased inhibition-related activation of the IFG [Page et al., 2009; Woolley et al., 2008], striatum [Kang et al., 2013; Page et al., 2009; Woolley et al., 2008], and thalamus [Page et al., 2009; Woolley et al., 2008], although one study reported increased…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialvan den Heuvel, O. A., Veltman, D. J., Groenewegen, H. J., Dolan, R. J., Cath, D. C., Boellaard, R., Mesina, C. T., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., van Oppen, P., Witter, M. P., et al. (2004) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.06.007 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationKwon, J. S. (2003) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.7.962 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Schlösser, R. G. M., Wagner, G., Schachtzabel, C., Peikert, G., Koch, K., Reichenbach, J. R., & Sauer, H. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20980 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Blasi, G., Bianco, L. L., Taurisano, P., Gelao, B., Romano, R., Fazio, L., Papazacharias, A., Giorgio, A. D., Caforio, G., Rampino, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3609-09.2009 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Individual Differences in Amygdala Activity Predict Response Speed during Working Memory
Schaefer, A., Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Yarkoni, T., & Gray, J. R. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2567-06.2006 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Kang, D.-H., Jang, J. H., Han, J. Y., Kim, J.-H., Jung, W. H., Choi, J.-S., Choi, C.-H., & Kwon, J. S. (2013) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.11.001 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Passamonti, L., Rowe, J., Ewbank, M., Hampshire, A., Keane, J., & Calder, A. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.045 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ousdal, O. T., Jensen, J., Server, A., Hariri, A. R., Nakstad, P. H., & Andreassen, O. A. (2008) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.066 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Subjective uncertainty and limbic hyperactivation in obsessive‐compulsive disorder
Stern, E. R., Welsh, R. C., Gonzalez, R., Fitzgerald, K. D., Abelson, J. L., & Taylor, S. F. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22038 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Functional and structural neural indices of risk aversion in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
Admon, R., Bleich-Cohen, M., Weizmant, R., Poyurovsky, M., Faragian, S., & Hendler, T. (2012) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.002 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Rubia, K., Cubillo, A., Woolley, J., Brammer, M. J., & Smith, A. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21048 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kim, M.-S., Kang, S.-S., Youn, T., Kang, D.-H., Kim, J.-J., & Kwon, J. S. (2003) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/s0925-4927(03)00045-3 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Lin, P. (2007) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.12.024 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
van den Heuvel, O. A., Mataix‐Cols, D., Zwitser, G., Cath, D. C., van der Werf, Y. D., Groenewegen, H. J., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & Veltman, D. J. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711000535 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationDenys, D. A. J. P., Nieuwerburgh, F. V., Deforce, D. L. D., & Westenberg, H. G. M. (2006) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.12.001 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A Role for the Human Amygdala in Higher Cognition
Schaefer, A., & Gray, J. (2007) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro.2007.18.5.355 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Cardoner, N., Harrison, B. J., Pujol, J., Soriano‐Mas, C., Hernández‐Ribas, R., López‐Solà, M., Real, E., Deus, J., Ortiz, H., Alonso, P., et al. (2011) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/15622975.2011.559268 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Long, H., Liu, B., Hou, B., Wang, C., Li, J., Qin, W., Wang, D., Zhou, Y., Kendrick, K. M., Yu, C., et al. (2013) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-013-1299-x · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Rasch, B., Spalek, K., Buholzer, S., Luechinger, R., Boesiger, P., de Quervain, D. J. ‐., & Papassotiropoulos, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.054 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Surguladze, S., Raduà, J., El‐Hage, W., Gohier, B., Sato, J. R., Kronhaus, D. M., Proitsi, P., Powell, J. F., & Phillips, M. L. (2012) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2011.69 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Ćurčić-Blake, B., Swart, M., & Aleman, A. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr124 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationĆurĉić‐Blake, B., Swart, M., Horst, G. J. T., Langers, D. R. M., Kema, I. P., & Aleman, A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.036 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationJonnal (2000) · doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20001204)96:6
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Puzzles and prospects
Robbins, T. W., Vaghi, M. M., & Banca, P. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.046 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Brain circuitry of compulsivity
van den Heuvel, O. A., van Wingen, G., Soriano-Mas, C., Alonso, P., Chamberlain, S. R., Nakamae, T., Denys, D., Goudriaan, A. E., & Veltman, D. J. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.005 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of habit in compulsivity
Gillan, C. M., Robbins, T. W., Sahakian, B. J., van den Heuvel, O. A., & van Wingen, G. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.033 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Norman, L. J., Taylor, S. F., Liu, Y., Radua, J., Chye, Y., De Wit, S. J., Huyser, C., Karahanoglu, F. I., Luks, T., Manoach, D., et al. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.11.010 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Thorsen, A. L., Hagland, P., Raduà, J., Mataix‐Cols, D., Kvale, G., Hansen, B. K. A., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.01.009 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Reggente, N., Moody, T. D., Morfini, F., Sheen, C., Rissman, J., O’Neill, J., & Feusner, J. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716686115 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Moody, T. D., Morfini, F., Cheng, G., Sheen, C., Tadayonnejad, R., Reggente, N., O'Neill, J., & Feusner, J. D. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.192 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Connectomics-based structural network alterations in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Reess, T. J., Rus, O. G., Schmidt, R., de Reus, M. A., Zaudig, M., Wagner, G., Zimmer, C., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Koch, K. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.163 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
de Vries, F. E., de Wit, S. J., van den Heuvel, O. A., Veltman, D. J., Cath, D. C., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & van der Werf, Y. D. (2017) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2017.1353132 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationTomiyama, H., Nakao, T., Murayama, K., Nemoto, K., Ikari, K., Yamada, S., Kuwano, M., Hasuzawa, S., Togao, O., Hiwatashi, A., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102004 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Perera, M. P. N., Gotsis, E. S., Bailey, N. W., Fitzgibbon, B. M., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae327 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Han, H. J., Jung, W. H., Yun, J.-Y., Park, J. W., Cho, K., Hur, J., Shin, N. Y., Lee, T. Y., & Kwon, J. S. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715002391 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The sense of agency for brain disorders: A comprehensive review and proposed framework
Malik, R. A., Galang, C. M., & Finger, E. C. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104759 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zartaloudi, E., Laws, K. R., & Bramon, E. (2019) · Psychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1097/ypg.0000000000000241 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Liu, J., Li, X., Xue, K., Chen, Y., Wang, K., Niu, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Cheng, J. (2020) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13162 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Thorsen, A. L., de Wit, S. J., de Vries, F. E., Cath, D. C., Veltman, D. J., van der Werf, Y. D., Mataix‐Cols, D., Hansen, B. K. A., Kvale, G., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.007 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationThorsen, A. L., de Wit, S. J., Hagland, P., Ousdal, O. T., Hansen, B. K. A., Hagen, K., Kvale, G., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2020) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102460 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Snyder, A. D., Ma, L., Steinberg, J. L., Woisard, K., & Moeller, F. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.636273 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hampshire, A., Zadel, A., Sandrone, S., Soreq, E., Fineberg, N. A., Bullmore, E. T., Robbins, T. W., Sahakian, B. J., & Chamberlain, S. R. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.09.010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Mier, D. U., Schirmbeck, F. N., Stößel, G., Esslinger, C., Rausch, F., Englisch, S., Eisenacher, S., de Haan, L., Meyer‐Lindenberg, A., Kirsch, P., et al. (2018) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-018-0965-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Neurocognitive Endophenotypes of OCD
Vaghi, M. M. S. (2021) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2020_197 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sleep predicts the response to rTMS and CBT in patients with OCD: an open label effectiveness study
Gajadien, P., Postma, T. S., van Oostrom, I., Scheepstra, K. W. F., van Dijk, H., Sack, A. T., van den Heuvel, O. A., & Arns, M. (2022) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100353 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Effects of Bergen 4-Day Treatment on Resting-State Graph Features in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Thorsen, A. L., Vriend, C., de Wit, S. J., Ousdal, O. T., Hagen, K., Hansen, B. K. A., Kvale, G., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.01.007 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Qiao, Y., Song, X., Yan, J., Pan, W., Chia, C.-H., Zhao, D., Niu, C. M., Xie, Q., & Jin, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1416810 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fan, J., Xia, J., Liu, Q., Wang, X., Du, H., Gao, F., Han, Y., Yu, Q., Lu, J., Xiao, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.07.031 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zhao, Z., Wang, C., Ma, J., Shan, X.-W., Shi, L.-J., Wang, X., Huang, P. C., Li, H., Sang, D., Kou, S., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01131-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mitiureva, D. G., Sysoeva, O., Proshina, E. A., Portnova, G. V., Khayrullina, G., & Martynova, O. (2024) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111828 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Temperament and neural activation during the affective Stroop task: A functional connectivity study
Dragan, W. Ł., Sokołowski, A., & Folkierska-Żukowska, M. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111385 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tomiyama, H., Murayama, K., Nemoto, K., Tomita, M., Kato, K., Matsuo, A., Ohno, A., Kang, M., Togao, O., Ishigami, K., et al. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad058 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Yacou, M. A., Chowdury, A., Easter, P. C., Hanna, G. L., Rosenberg, D. R., & Diwadkar, V. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869106 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Abnormal focal segments in left uncinate fasciculus in adults with obsessive–compulsive disorder
Zhang, S., Li, B., Jiang, J., Hu, X., Li, H., Cao, L., Zhou, Z., Liang, K., Zhou, H., Zhang, L., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128808 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hagland, P., Thorsen, A. L., Ousdal, O. T., Gjestad, R., de Wit, S. J., Hansen, B. K. A., Hagen, K., Kvale, G., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.519727 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Tomiyama, H., Murayama, K., Nemoto, K., Kato, K., Matsuo, A., Ohno, A., Kang, M., Togao, O., Ishigami, K., & Nakao, T. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad170 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Tomiyama, H., Murayama, K., Nemoto, K., Tomita, M., Hasuzawa, S., Mizobe, T., Kato, K., Matsuo, A., Ohno, A., Kan, M. R., et al. (2023) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111669 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Proshina, E. A., Martynova, O., Portnova, G. V., Khayrullina, G., & Sysoeva, O. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2024.1339590 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Subcortical shape in pediatric and adult obsessive‐compulsive disorder
Wang, Z., Fontaine, M., Cyr, M., Rynn, M. A., Simpson, H. B., Marsh, R., & Pagliaccio, D. (2022) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23261 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Safar, K., Pang, E. W., Vandewouw, M. M., de Villa, K., Arnold, P. D., Iaboni, A., Ayub, M., Kelley, E. A., Lerch, J. P., Anagnostou, E. A., et al. (2023) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103408 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
van den Heuvel, O. A., & de Wit, S. J. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.03.011 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, J., Lei, T., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Liu, Z., Zhang, A., Men, W., Zhang, G., Hong, X., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.09.017 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Jaspers‐Fayer, F., Lin, S. Y., Best, J. R., Thorsen, A. L., Negreiros, J., Chan, E., Ellwyn, R., Lin, B., de Wit, S. J., van den Heuvel, O. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.220064 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thorsen, A. L., de Wit, S. J., Hagland, P., Ousdal, O. T., Hansen, B. K. A., Kvale, G., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/achuw · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ishii, R. (2023) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.004 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Actor-critic” dichotomous hyperactivation and hypoconnectivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Araújo, A. C., Duarte, I. C., Sousa, T., Meneses, S., Pereira, A. T., Robbins, T. W., Macedo, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2024) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103729 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Jones, R., Leunissen, J. M., Whyte, A. R., Werson, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2025) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-025-01316-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Džinalija, N., van den Heuvel, O. A., Simpson, H. B., Ivanov, I., Araújo, A. I., Balachander, S., Beucke, J. C., Brandeis, D., Brem, S., Bruin, W. B., et al. (2026) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2026.09.021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Han, J., & Kwon, J. S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164313.010
Endophenotypes, Personality, and Mental Disorder
Young, G. C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_749-1
Endophenotypes, Personality, and Mental Disorder
Young, G. C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_749
Tomiyama, H., Murayama, K., Nemoto, K., Kato, K., Matsuo, A., Kang, M., Sashikata, K., Togao, O., & Nakao, T. (2024) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111884
Preliminary examination of disgust learning as a potential OCD endophenotype
Jessup, S. C., Zald, D. H., & Olatunji, B. O. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121619
- Authors
- van Velzen, L. S., de Wit, S. J., Ćurĉić‐Blake, B., Cath, D. C., de Vries, F. E., Veltman, D. J., van der Werf, Y. D., & van den Heuvel, O. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychiatry VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA) Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4064-4075
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6869170
- OpenAlex
- W1494970486
- Semantic Scholar
- a821dcc4d13d394bb1a4c82087770f55c6563652
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NARSAD young investigator award of the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
- NWO-ZonMw VENI (916.86.036)
- NWO-ZonMW AGIKO stipend (920-03-542)
- Netherlands Brain Foundation ((2010(1)-50))
- Stichting tot Steun VCVGT (STO957)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, response inhibition, amygdala, inferior frontal gyrus, stop-signal task, endophenotypes, unaffected siblings, dynamic causal modeling
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychomotor Performance, Recruitment, Neurophysiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review