Cited by 50Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Altered inhibition-related frontolimbic connectivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder

Open access
van Velzen, Laura S., de Wit, Stella J., Ćurĉić‐Blake, Branislava, Cath, Daniëlle C., de Vries, Froukje E., Veltman, Dick J., van der Werf, Ysbrand D., van den Heuvel, Odile A.·2015·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that response inhibition is impaired in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder and their unaffected siblings, suggesting that these deficits may be considered a cognitive endophenotype of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Structural and functional neural correlates of altered response inhibition have been identified in patients and siblings. This study aims to examine the functional integrity of the response inhibition network in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder and their unaffected siblings. Methods: Forty‐one unmedicated patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder, 17 of their unaffected siblings and 37 healthy controls performed a stop signal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psycho‐physiological interaction analysis was used to examine functional connectivity between the following regions of interest: the bilateral inferior frontal gyri, presupplementary motor area, subthalamic nuclei, inferior parietal lobes, anterior cingulate cortex, and amygdala. We then used dynamic causal modeling to investigate the directionality of the networks involved. Results: Patients, and to a lesser extent also their unaffected siblings, show altered connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and the amygdala during response inhibition. The follow‐up dynamic causal modeling suggests a bottom‐up influence of the amygdala on the inferior frontal gyrus in healthy controls, whereas processing occurs top‐down in patients with obsessive–compulsive, and in both directions in siblings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that amygdala activation in obsessive–compulsive disorder interferes differently with the task‐related recruitment of the inhibition network, underscoring the role of limbic disturbances in cognitive dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4064–4075, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22898

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 57 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Post-hoc tests showed stronger negative coupling between the left IFG and right amygdala in OCD patients than controls.

    “Follow-up post-hoc tests showed increased negative coupling between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right amygdala in OCD patients compared to controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Dynamic causal modeling showed that the amygdala exerted a bottom-up influence on the inferior frontal gyrus during task performance in healthy controls and unaffected siblings.

    “Results of the DCM analysis indicated that the amygdala had a bottom-up effect on the IFG during task performance in healthy controls and siblings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In all three groups, the models with the highest exceedance probability received input in the bilateral IFG.

    “In all three participant groups, models with the highest exceedance probability received input in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (see Supporting Information Fig. S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The apparent performance-enhancing effect of the amygdala on the inferior frontal gyrus was absent in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    “This putative performance-enhancing effect of the amygdala on the IFG appears to be absent in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The study found no significant correlations between stop-signal reaction time and inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity in patients or siblings.

    “As we did not find significant correlations between SSRT and IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients or siblings”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean connection strength was positive in patients and controls but negative in siblings.

    “The mean connection strength was positive in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and controls, but was negative in siblings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BMS did not identify a winning model in healthy controls; several models with bottom-up connections had equally high exceedance probabilities.

    “Results of the BMS did not reveal a winning model in the healthy control group, as the exceedance probabilities for multiple models that included bottom-up connections were equally high (see Supporting Information Table S3 and Fig. S1), indicating multiple winning models in this group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    SSRT was significantly longer in patients than controls, while siblings did not differ from either group.

    “As reported previously [de Wit et al., 2012], SSRT was significantly increased in patients compared to controls (t 5 2.07, P 5 0.04), whereas siblings did not differ in SSRT from both patients and controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Wit et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In siblings, the same relationship appeared (r = -0.650, P = 0.005), but after removing an outlier it was only trend-level (r = -0.459, P = 0.074).

    “The relationship between IFG-amygdala connectivity and pre-SMA activity was also seen in siblings (r 5 20.650, P 5 0.005), but was after removal of an outlier only seen at trend-level (r 5 20.459, P 5 0.074).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In siblings, the winning model had bidirectional IFG-amygdala connections in both hemispheres (exceedance probability 28%); the patients' winning model was only slightly worse in siblings (21%).

    “In siblings, the winning model included bidirectional connections between the IFG and amygdala in both hemispheres (see Supporting Information Fig S1) and had an exceedance probability of 28%.However, the winning model for patients (i.e., top-down connection in the left hemisphere) was only slightly worse in siblings, with an exceedance probability of 21%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The IFG and pre-SMA are essential for response inhibition and appear to initiate the neural stop signal.

    “The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) are crucial for response inhibition [Chambers et al., 2006;Chen et al., 2009] and appear to initiate the neural stop signal [Aron, 2011].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chambers et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chen et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Aron, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The authors previously reported reduced activation in the right inferior parietal cortex and right IFG in OCD patients during a response inhibition task.

    “We have also previously reported decreased activation of the right inferior parietal and right IFG in OCD patients during performance of a response inhibition task [ de Wit et al., 2012].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Wit et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Neurobiological models of OCD implicate dysfunction in frontal-striatal, frontoparietal, and frontolimbic circuits in the disorder's etiology.

    “Current neurobiological models implicate dysfunction of frontal-striatal, frontoparietal and frontolimbic circuits in the etiology of this disorder [Milad and Rauch, 2012;van den Heuvel et al., in press].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Milad and Rauch, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites van den Heuvel et al., in press

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    The authors previously found greater task-related left pre-SMA activation in OCD patients and their siblings, suggesting compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivity may be an endophenotype of OCD.

    “We additionally found increased task-related activation of the left pre-SMA in OCD patients and their siblings, indicating that compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivity during response inhibition may be an endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Wit et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients with OCD exhibit impaired response inhibition, shown by more commission errors on go/no-go tasks and longer stop signal reaction times on the stop signal task.

    “Studies have shown response inhibition deficits in patients with this disorder, as indicated by increased commission errors during go-no go task performance [Bannon et al., 2002] and increased stop signal reaction times (SSRT) in the stop signal task [Chamberlain et al., 2006].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bannon et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chamberlain et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors such as compulsions.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Those models posit an imbalance among affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor CSTC circuits, plus altered connectivity linking these circuits with the amygdala.

    “The models propose an imbalance between interacting affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor corticostriato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits, and altered connectivity between these circuits and the amygdala [Milad and Rauch, 2012;van den Heuvel et al., in press].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Milad and Rauch, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites van den Heuvel et al., in press

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unaffected siblings of OCD patients also show response inhibition deficits, which suggests the impairment is state-independent and supports it as a neurocognitive endophenotype of OCD.

    “Deficits in response inhibition have also been observed in unaffected siblings of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, suggesting that the response inhibition impairment is state-independent and strengthening the notion of impaired response inhibition as a neurocognitive endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder [Chamberlain et al., 2007].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chamberlain et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In healthy people, the amygdala contributes to motor inhibition triggered by threat.

    “Studies in healthy samples showed that the amygdala plays a role in motor inhibition in response to threat [Sagaspe et al., 2011]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sagaspe et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    No correction for multiple comparisons was applied in the DCM analyses, to reduce the risk of type-2 errors.

    “To also reduce the risk for type-2 errors, we used no correction for multiple comparisons in the DCM analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior work has suggested that the amygdala may mediate detection of salient or goal-relevant stimuli, or vigilance to uncertain events such as the stop signal.

    “This is in line with previous suggestions that detection of salient or goalrelevant stimuli (in this case the stop signal) or vigilance in response to uncertain events (the presentation of the stop signal) may be mediated by the amygdala”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Davis and Whalen, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schaefer et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schaefer and Gray, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The IFG is essential for response inhibition and participates in detecting the stop signal and generating inhibitory output.

    “The inferior frontal gyrus is crucial for response inhibition [Chambers et al., 2006] and is involved in both the detection of the stop signal and generation of inhibitory output [Chikazoe et al., 2009;Levy and Wagner, 2011].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chambers et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chikazoe et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Levy and Wagner, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex during processing of emotional stimuli.

    “and increased connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex [Rasch et al., 2010]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rasch et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In healthy people, the amygdala contributes to detecting behaviorally relevant or salient stimuli in cognitive tasks.

    “and in the detection of behaviorally relevant or salient stimuli in other cognitive tasks [Kiehl et al., 2005;Ousdal et al., 2008].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kiehl et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ousdal et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    For the PPI analysis, results were considered significant after multiple-testing correction at P < 0.0001723.

    “For the PPI analysis, results survive correction for multiple testing if P 0.0001723.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In the DCM subset, groups remained matched on demographic measures and performance, but included siblings were significantly younger than excluded siblings.

    “Groups were still matched for demographic measures and performance, siblings included in the DCM analysis were significantly younger (mean age 33.2; standard deviation 10.87) than siblings not included in the DCM analysis (mean age 50.54; standard deviation 11.15) (t[15] 5 2.975, P 5 0.009, see Supporting Information Table S3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased connectivity between the amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus during processing of emotional stimuli.

    “and between the amygdala and IFG [Drabant et al., 2006] during processing of emotional stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Drabant et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased extracellular dopamine levels.

    “Furthermore, the met allele of the COMT gene has been associated with increased extracellular dopamine levels [Lachman et al., 1996]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lachman et al., 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although many studies link inhibition to the right IFG, the left IFG also appears involved.

    “Although many studies implicate the right IFG in inhibition, the left IFG seems also involved [Duann et al., 2009;Swick et al., 2008].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Duann et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Swick et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both right and left IFG have been found hypoactive during response inhibition in OCD patients, possibly reflecting reduced attention to the stop signal or impaired generation of the neural stop signal.

    “Both the right IFG [Page et al., 2009;de Wit et al., 2012;Woolley et al., 2008] and left IFG [Maltby et al., 2005;Page et al., 2009] have been found to be hypoactive during response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which may reflect decreased attention allocation to the stop signal or an impairment in generating the neural stop signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Page et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites de Wit et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Woolley et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Over half of the patients met criteria for at least one additional axis-I disorder, but comorbid disorders were not associated with task performance or OCD severity.

    “More than half of the patients also met criteria for one or more other axis-I disorders (54%), but the presence of comorbid disorders was not associated with task performance or obsessive-compulsive disorder severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have found increased amygdala activation in obsessive-compulsive disorder during decision making and processing of emotional faces or disease-relevant emotional stimuli.

    “and increased amygdala activation during decision making and processing of emotional faces or disease-relevant emotional stimuli [Cardoner et al., 2011;Stern et al., 2013;van den Heuvel et al., 2004].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cardoner et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stern et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites van den Heuvel et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies have shown altered brain activation in response to salient stimuli using oddball tasks in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    “Previous studies strengthen this notion by showing altered brain activation in response to salient stimuli using oddball tasks in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Kim et al., 2003;Rubia et al., 2011].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rubia et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    OCD patients had higher depression scores than controls.

    “Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder scored higher on clinical measures of depression than controls (Montgomery-A ˚sberg Depression Rating Scale scores: patients: mean 11.5 (8.1); siblings: mean 1.9 (3.5); controls: mean 0.8 (1.0) (F[2,92] 5 0.26, P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have found structural abnormalities of the amygdala in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    “Some studies, however, have observed structural abnormalities of the amygdala in obsessive-compulsive disorder [Kwon et al., 2003;Szeszko et al., 1999]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kwon et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Szeszko et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies have shown that the limbic system, including the amygdala, is involved in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    “system, including the amygdala [Admon et al., 2012;Cardoner et al., 2011;Milad and Rauch, 2012] in the disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Admon et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cardoner et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Milad and Rauch, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Prior work has suggested that the amygdala may send modulatory signals to the cortex that affect attention allocation or cause behavioral adaptation.

    “and that the amygdala may send modulatory signals to the cortex affecting attention allocation or causing behavioral adaptation [Davis and Whalen, 2001;Schaefer et al., 2006;Schaefer and Gray, 2007].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Davis and Whalen, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schaefer et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schaefer and Gray, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In OCD patients, resting-state connectivity is greater between the right middle cingulate cortex and right parahippocampal cortex, and between the right middle cingulate cortex and left caudate; middle cingulate-parahippocampal connectivity correlates negatively with SSRT.

    “This group found greater connectivity between the right middle cingulate cortex and right parahippocampal cortex, and between the right middle cingulate cortex and left caudate at rest in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Connectivity between the middle cingulate cortex and the parahippocampal cortex correlated negatively with SSRT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kang et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous imaging genetics studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder showed that the dopamine receptor D2 polymorphism is associated with altered functional connectivity between the amygdala and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during emotional processing.

    “Previous imaging genetics studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder showed that the dopamine receptor D2 polymorphism is associated with altered functional connectivity between the amygdala and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during emotional processing [Blasi et al., 2009].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Blasi et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Altered IFG-amygdala connectivity in patients and siblings leads to inefficient frontal-striatal processing, producing compensatory task-related pre-SMA hyperactivation.

    “We hypothesize that altered connectivity between the IFG and amygdala in patients and siblings leads to inefficient processing in frontal-striatal circuits, resulting in compensatory taskrelated hyperactivation of the pre-SMA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Both the dopamine receptor D2 gene and the COMT gene have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder in several studies.

    “Both abovementioned genes have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder in several studies [Denys et al., 2006;Karayiorgou et al., 1997;Schindler et al., 2000].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Denys et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Karayiorgou et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schindler et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A DCM study of the Stroop task found increased inhibition-related connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in OCD patients.

    “Another study examined connectivity during performance of a related inhibition task, the Stroop task, using dynamic causal modeling and found increased inhibitionrelated connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Schl€ osser et al., 2010].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schl€ osser et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene affect fronto-limbic connectivity.

    “Additionally, polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene affect fronto-limbic connectivity [Long et al., 2013;Surguladze et al., 2012]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Long et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Surguladze et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The participant groups were matched on age, gender, and educational level.

    “To briefly summarize, participants were matched for age (patients: mean 38.6 y (standard deviation 9.8); siblings: mean 38.3 y (13.4); controls: mean 39.7 y (11.6); (F[2,92] =0.01, P 5 0.871), gender (patients: 21/41 males; siblings: 12/17 males; controls: 18/37 males); (v 2 5 2.4, P 5 0.297), and educational level”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The present study used two complementary techniques, PPI and DCM, to assess functional connectivity.

    “Strengths of the present study are the inclusion of medication-free subjects and use of two complementary techniques to assess functional connectivity (PPI and DCM).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    “and have been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder [Lin, 2007].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lin, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The findings suggest that altered inferior frontal gyrus-amygdala connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, and to a lesser extent in unaffected siblings, interferes with the task-related efficiency of the response inhibition network, resulting in compensatory pre-supplementary motor area hyperactivation.

    “To conclude, our findings suggest that altered IFGamygdala connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, and to a lesser extent in their unaffected siblings, interferes with the task-related efficiency of the response inhibition network resulting in compensatory pre-SMA hyperactivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because DCM used subject-specific regions of interest, not all subjects from the PPI analysis could be included in the DCM analysis, which may warrant replication in a larger sample.

    “Because of the use of subject-specific regions of interest in DCM, not all subjects in the PPI analysis could be included in our DCM analysis, which may warrant replication in a larger sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
42 of 42
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The specific pathways by which limbic regions including the amygdala influence cognitive functioning have not been identified.

    “The specific pathways by which (para)limbic regions including the amygdala may influence cognitive functioning have yet to be identified.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No studies have focused on functional connectivity patterns during response inhibition in OCD patients.

    “To date, no studies have focused on the functional connectivity patterns during response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors such as compulsions.

    “Impaired response inhibition may underlie repetitive behaviors, such as the compulsions seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It was unclear from previous research whether input was first received by the amygdala or the inferior frontal gyrus or by both simultaneously.

    “As it was unclear from previous research whether input was first received by the amygdala or the inferior frontal gyrus or by both regions simultaneously, we created a model space of models with all the possible inputs (to the IFG, to the amygdala or to both).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.

    “The parallel connections between the same regions across hemispheres were assumed to be bidirectional in every model.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no report had described altered amygdala connectivity during response inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.

    “Altered connectivity of the amygdala during response inhibition performance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder has never been reported before.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunction of the inhibition-related network in OCD patients and unaffected siblings seems to be explained at least partly by altered connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and the amygdala.

    “Moreover, the reported dysfunction of the inhibition-related network in OCD patients and unaffected siblings seems to be explained, at least partly, by altered connectivity between the IFG and the amygdala (van Velzen et al., 2015) suggesting an important role for the limbic circuit in inhibitory impairment in OCD.”

    From The role of habit in compulsivity (2016) · cites this paper as van Velzen et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Velzen, L. S., de Wit, S. J., Ćurĉić‐Blake, B., Cath, D. C., de Vries, F. E., Veltman, D. J., van der Werf, Y. D., & van den Heuvel, O. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA) Amsterdam the Netherlands
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
4064-4075
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1494970486
Cited by
50
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NARSAD young investigator award of the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  • NWO-ZonMw VENI (916.86.036)
  • NWO-ZonMW AGIKO stipend (920-03-542)
  • Netherlands Brain Foundation ((2010(1)-50))
  • Stichting tot Steun VCVGT (STO957)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, response inhibition, amygdala, inferior frontal gyrus, stop-signal task, endophenotypes, unaffected siblings, dynamic causal modeling
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychomotor Performance, Recruitment, Neurophysiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review