Cited by 433Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Functional neuroanatomy of the parahippocampal region: The lateral and medial entorhinal areas

Kerr, Kristin M., Agster, Kara L., Furtak, Sharon C., Burwell, Rebecca D.·2007·Hippocampus

Abstract

The entorhinal cortex (EC) serves a pivotal role in corticohippocampal interactions, but a complete description of its extrinsic connections has not been presented. Here, we have summarized the cortical, subcortical, and hippocampal connections of the lateral entorhinal area (LEA) and the medial entorhinal area (MEA) in the rat. We found that the targets and relative strengths of the entorhinal connections are strikingly different for the LEA and MEA. For example, the LEA receives considerably heavier input from the piriform and insular cortices, whereas the MEA is more heavily targeted by the visual, posterior parietal, and retrosplenial cortices. Regarding subcortical connections, the LEA receives heavy input from the amygdala and olfactory structures, whereas the MEA is targeted by the dorsal thalamus, primarily the midline nuclei and also the dorsolateral and dorsoanterior thalamic nuclei. Differences in the LEA and MEA connections with hippocampal and parahippocampal structures are also described. In addition, because the EC is characterized by bands of intrinsic connectivity that span the LEA and MEA and project to different septotemporal levels of the dentate gyrus, special attention was paid to the efferents and afferents of those bands. Finally, we summarized the connections of the dorsocaudal MEA, the region in which the entorhinal "grid cells" were discovered. The subregional differences in entorhinal connectivity described here provide further evidence for functio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20315

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EC provides output to the subiculum, while receives inputs from the sensory cortex including the visual cortex.

    “EC provide output to the subiculum ( O'Mara, 2005), while receives inputs from the sensory cortex including the visual cortex (Kerr et al., 2007).”

    From Disrupted structural connectivity in ArcAβ mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (2020) · cites this paper as Kerr et al., 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerr, K. M., Agster, K. L., Furtak, S. C., & Burwell, R. D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Burwell, Rebecca D.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-02
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
697-708
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2068134369
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal region, intrinsic functional connectivity, dentate gyrus, amygdala, thalamus, piriform cortex, insula, grid cells, functional diversity, learning and memory, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Neuroanatomy, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review