Cited by 84Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Effect of a Brief Mindfulness Training on Distress Tolerance and Stress Reactivity.

Open access
Carpenter, Joseph K., Sanford, Jenny, Hofmann, Stefan G.·2019·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Poor distress tolerance (DT) is considered an underlying facet of anxiety, depression, and a number of other psychological disorders. Mindfulness may help to increase DT by fostering an attitude of acceptance or nonjudgment toward distressing experiences. Accordingly, the present study examined the effects of a brief mindfulness training on tolerance of different types of distress, and tested whether trait mindfulness moderates the effect of such training. Undergraduates (n = 107) naïve to mindfulness completed a measure of trait mindfulness and underwent a series of stress tasks (cold pressor, hyperventilation challenge, neutralization task) before and after completing a 15-minute mindfulness training or a no-instruction control in which participants listened to relaxing music. Participants in the mindfulness condition demonstrated greater task persistence on the hyperventilation task compared to the control group, as well as a decreased urge to neutralize the effects of writing an upsetting sentence. No effect on distress ratings during the tasks were found. Overall trait mindfulness did not significantly moderate task persistence, but those with lower scores on the act with awareness facet of mindfulness demonstrated greater relative benefit of mindfulness training on the hyperventilation challenge. Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect effects of mindfulness training on cold pressor task persistence and urges to neutralize through the use of the nonjudge and nonreact facets of mindfulness. These results suggest that a brief mindfulness training can increase DT without affecting the subjective experience of distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2018.10.003

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

8 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

12 of 56 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Improvements in distress tolerance are associated with successful treatment outcomes.

    “Research has also shown improvements in DT to be associated with successful treatment outcomes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Banducci, Connolly, Vujanovic, Alvarez, & Bonn-Miller, 2017 source
    • cites McHugh et al., 2014 source
  • Premisecitation

    Behavioral distress tolerance tasks show some domain specificity.

    “Behavioral DT tasks have been shown to demonstrate some level of domain specificity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McHugh et al, 2011 source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Mindfulness training may positively impact exposure therapy by helping individuals engage in more effective exposures.

    “Given the impact of mindfulness on DT shown in the present study, mindfulness training may positively impact exposure therapy by helping individuals engage in more effective exposures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brake et al., 2016 source
    • cites Hedman et al., 2017 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The comparison condition, which involved no instructions plus relaxing music, adequately controls for expectancy effects so that improvements in distress tolerance can be attributed to mindfulness skills rather than to merely employing a strategy.
  • Premisecitation

    Performance on distress tasks correlates with symptoms of psychopathology.

    “performance on such tasks correlates with symptoms of psychopathology (Cougle et al., 2011; Cougle et al., 2013; Marshall et al., 2008)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cougle et al., 2011 source
    • cites Cougle et al., 2013 source
    • cites Marshall et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that daily smokers who had a panic attack during an initial hyperventilation challenge persisted for less time on a second challenge, a behavioral distress-tolerance task. This supports an association with experimentally elicited panic reactivity, but not the broader claim that distress-task performance correlates with symptoms of psychopathology generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Mediation showed that mindfulness training influenced cold pressor persistence indirectly via the non-judge and non-react facets.

    “Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect effects of mindfulness training on cold pressor task persistence and urges to neutralize through the use of the non-judge and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 41
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The effects of mindfulness on the hyperventilation challenge and neutralization task are clinically relevant because performance on such tasks correlates with symptoms of psychopathology and the tasks map closely onto procedures used in exposure therapy.

    “The effects of mindfulness on the hyperventilation challenge and neutralization task are clinically relevant given that performance on such tasks correlates with symptoms of psychopathology (Cougle et al., 2011; Cougle et al., 2013; Marshall et al., 2008), and because the nature of the tasks maps on quite closely to procedures used in exposure therapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cougle et al., 2011 source
    • cites Cougle et al., 2013 source
    • cites Marshall et al., 2008 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pain tolerance on the cold pressor has been linked to negative mood and to abstinence in addiction.

    “tolerance of physical pain in the cold pressor task has been associated with negative mood and addiction abstinence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacPherson, Stipelman, Duplinsky, Brown, & Lejuez, 2008 source

      The Methods (2.2 Measures; page unavailable) identify the cold pressor task as a measure of pain tolerance. The Results (4.3; page unavailable) link longer persistence on that task to entering smoking treatment among men, but not women. The paper does not establish a link between cold-pressor tolerance and negative mood or addiction abstinence; treatment entry is not abstinence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Very brief mindfulness instructions without practice reduced persistence on the cold pressor relative to a spontaneous coping control.

    “ultra-brief mindfulness instructions with no opportunity to practice led to a decreased task persistence in the cold pressor compared to a spontaneous coping control”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans, Eisenlohr-Moul, Button, Baer, and Segerstrom (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The literature is inconsistent about whether higher trait mindfulness predicts greater benefit from mindfulness interventions.

    “A number of studies have shown that those higher in trait mindfulness benefit more from mindfulness interventions”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
      “However, results are not always consistent, as some studies have shown that lower trait mindfulness predicts better response to mindfulness interventions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Keng, Robins, Smoski, Dagenbach, & Leary, 2013 source

      The Results (no page supplied) report that higher trait mindfulness predicted greater decreases in sadness, but the association held across all conditions; there was no significant interaction showing greater benefit specifically from mindfulness training. The Discussion (no page supplied) does not establish that a number of studies found this pattern. Its discussion of inconsistent findings concerns mindfulness versus reappraisal, not whether trait mindfulness predicts intervention benefit. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Laurent, Laurent, Nelson, Wright, & Sanchez, 2015 source
    • cites Reiner, Granot, Soffer, & Lipsitz, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Various forms of distress may matter more for different psychological problems.

    “different types of distress may be more relevant for distinct psychological issues”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leyro et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Interoceptive distress during a hyperventilation challenge is associated with panic symptomology.

    “the interoceptive distress involved in a hyperventilation challenge is associated with panic symptomology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marshall et al., 2008 source

      The Method (Procedure; Challenge Measures) says hyperventilation elicits panic-related symptoms and uses persistence on the challenge to measure tolerance of interoceptive distress. The Discussion reports that, among daily smokers, a panic attack during the first challenge was associated with lower distress tolerance during a second challenge. It does not directly test whether the intensity of interoceptive distress during a challenge is associated with panic symptom severity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness-based strategies during exposure are associated with declining distress levels.

    “This idea is also supported by research showing mindfulness-based strategies during exposure are associated with declining distress levels (Brake et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brake et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The benefits of facets of mindfulness like observing and acting with awareness may depend on the presence of sufficient levels of nonjudgment and nonreactivity.

    “This could be particularly fruitful in the context of research suggesting that the benefits of facets of mindfulness like observing and acting with awareness may depend on the presence of sufficient levels of nonjudgment and nonreactivity (Eisenlohr-Moul, Walsh, Charnig, Lynam, & Baer, 2012; Peters, Eisenlohr-Moul, Upton, & Baer, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eisenlohr-Moul, Walsh, Charnig, Lynam, & Baer, 2012 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) reports that observing was associated with less alcohol and tobacco use at higher levels of nonreactivity. But the paper explicitly did not examine acting with awareness, and it found no predictive interaction between observing and nonjudging. Its findings therefore do not support extending the claim to both facets or both proposed conditions. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Peters, Eisenlohr-Moul, Upton, & Baer, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No effect of condition was seen on SUDS for the cold pressor (B = −1.98, SE = 3.78, p = 0.91, sr2 = 0.00) or hyperventilation (B = −5.07, SE = 4.15, p = 0.22, sr2 = 0.00) when controlling for gender, pre-intervention distress, and, for hyperventilation, tidal volume ratio.

    “Specifically, no effect of condition was seen for cold pressor (B = −1.98, SE = 3.78, p = 0.91, sr2 = 0.00) or hyperventilation (B = −5.07, SE = 4.15, p = 0.22, sr2 = 0.00) when controlling for gender, pre-intervention distress, and in the case of hyperventilation, tidal volume ratio.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the hyperventilation challenge, condition had a significant effect on task persistence after controlling for pre-intervention persistence, gender, tidal volume ratio, and FFMQ; participants receiving mindfulness training persisted longer than controls (B = 61.34, SE = 12.10, p < 0.001), and condition uniquely accounted for 10.9% of variance.

    “Results of the hierarchical linear regression in Table 2 indicate that condition had a significant effect on task persistence after controlling for pre-intervention persistence, gender, tidal volume ratio, and FFMQ. Specifically, participants receiving mindfulness training persisting longer than those in the control condition (B = 61.34, SE = 12.10, p < 0.001). The squared semi-partial correlation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Condition uniquely accounted for 8.7% and FFMQ uniquely accounted for 4.6% of post-neutralization urges.

    “Semi-partial correlation coefficients signified that condition uniquely accounted for 8.7% and FFMQ uniquely accounted for 4.6% of post-neutralization urges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the cold pressor task, controlling for gender, pre-intervention task persistence, and trait mindfulness, the effect of condition on post-intervention task persistence did not reach significance (B = 10.09, SE = 5.98, p = 0.09, sr2 = 0.017), though it was in the expected direction and accounted for an additional 1.6% of variance.

    “Controlling for gender, pre-intervention task persistence, and trait mindfulness, the effect of condition on post-intervention task persistence did not reach significance (B = 10.09, SE = 5.98, p = 0.09, sr2 = 0.017), though results were in the expected direction such that those in the mindfulness condition persisted longer than those in the control condition. The squared semi-partial correlation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the neutralization task, indirect effects through the individual Nonreact (B = −0.64, SE = 0.30, 95% CI = −1.27 to −0.09) and Nonjudge (B = −1.02, SE = 0.38, 95% CI = −1.85 to −0.35) items were significant.

    “However, there was a similar pattern of results to the cold pressor in that the indirect effects through the individual Nonreact (B = −0.64, SE = 0.30, 95% CI = −1.27 to −0.09) and Nonjudge (B = −1.02, SE = 0.38, 95% CI = −1.85 to −0.35) items were significant (see Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-report measure of mindfulness use during the tasks validly captures the mindfulness skills it is intended to measure.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Mindfulness use significantly predicted a lower likelihood of engaging in neutralization behavior (B = −0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.48, OR = 0.79).

    “In addition, mindfulness use significantly predicted a lower likelihood of engaging in neutralization behavior (B = −0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.48, OR = 0.79).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the cold pressor task, exploratory mediation analyses with individual mindfulness use items showed significant indirect effects through Nonreact (B = 5.37, SE = 2.66, 95% CI = 0.95 to 11.25) and Nonjudge (B = 6.63, SE = 3.61, 95% CI = 0.42 to 14.63).

    “Exploratory mediation analyses with individual mindfulness use items revealed that this effect was the result of the Nonreact and Nonjudge items, as there was a significant indirect effect of condition on cold pressor task through Nonreact (B = 5.37, SE = 2.66, 95% CI = 0.95 to 11.25) and Nonjudge (B = 6.63, SE = 3.61, 95% CI = 0.42 to 14.63) (see Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-report measure of mindfulness use during the tasks validly captures the mindfulness skills it is intended to measure.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the cold pressor task, neither the main effect of FFMQ nor the condition by FFMQ interaction was significant.

    “Neither the main effect of FFMQ or the condition by FFMQ interaction were significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were significant main effects of condition and FFMQ on post-neutralization urges to neutralize, such that greater FFMQ and being in the mindfulness condition predicted significantly weaker urges after the one minute neutralization period.

    “In addition, there were significant main effects of condition and FFMQ on post-neutralization urges to neutralize, such that greater FFMQ and being in the mindfulness condition predicted significantly weaker urges after the one minute neutralization period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No effect of condition was seen on SUDS change at either time point, or on post-rumination neutralization urges.

    “No effect of condition was seen on SUDS change at either time point, or on post-rumination neutralization urges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Self-reported mindfulness use significantly correlated with change in task persistence for the cold pressor (r = 0.30, p = 0.004) and hyperventilation (r = 0.32, p = 0.02) tasks.

    “Self-reported mindfulness use significantly correlated with change in task persistence for the cold pressor (r = 0.30, p = 0.004) and hyperventilation (r = 0.32, p = 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the cold pressor task, although the direct effect of condition on task persistence did not reach significance, there was a significant indirect effect through self-reported mindfulness use during the task (B = 11.18, SE = 4.64, 95% CI = 2.90 to 20.86).

    “For the cold pressor task, although the direct effect of condition on task persistence did not reach significance (p = 0.09, reported above), there was a significant indirect effect through self-reported mindfulness use during the task (B = 11.18, SE = 4.64, 95% CI = 2.90 to 20.86).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-report measure of mindfulness use during the tasks validly captures the mindfulness skills it is intended to measure.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the hyperventilation challenge, there was no main effect of FFMQ, and the interaction between FFMQ and condition approached but did not reach significance (B = −1.55, SE = .81, p = 0.054), accounting for 2.2% of unique variance; greater FFMQ resulted in a smaller effect of mindfulness training on task persistence compared to control.

    “There was no main effect of FFMQ, and the interaction between FFMQ and condition approached but did not reach significance (B = −1.55, SE = .81, p = 0.054). The direction of this effect was such that greater FFMQ resulted in a smaller effect of mindfulness training on task persistence compared to the no instructions control. The squared semi-partial correlation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Paired samples t-tests showed no significant pre- to post-intervention differences in tidal volume during the hyperventilation challenge for either the mindfulness condition (t(46) = 1.45, p = 0.15, d = 0.22) or the control condition (t(48) = 1.04, p = 0.30, d = 0.16).

    “Paired samples t-tests demonstrated that there were no significant differences in tidal volume during the hyperventilation challenge from pre- to post-intervention for either mindfulness (t(46) = 1.45, p = 0.15, d = 0.22) or control (t(48) = 1.04, p = 0.30, d = 0.16) participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most common neutralization behavior was visualizing the accident with a more positive or neutral outcome (37.7%), followed by destroying or altering the sentence (24.5%), turning over or concealing the paper (21.7%), carrying out a superstitious act (13.2%), and using a religious strategy (5.7%).

    “The most common behavior was to visualize the accident but with a more positive or neutral outcome, a strategy endorsed by 37.7% of the participants. This was followed by destroying or altering the sentence (24.5%), turning over or concealing the paper (21.7%), carrying out a superstitious act (13.2%) and using a religious strategy (5.7%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interactions of condition with FFMQ-Observe (B = 3.80, SE = 3.03, p = 0.21, sr2 = 0.00) and FFMQ-Describe (B = −.095, SE = 2.38, p = 0.97, sr2 = 0.01) were not significant.

    “whereas interactions with FFMQ-Observe (B = 3.80, SE = 3.03, p = 0.21, sr2 = 0.00) and FFMQ-Describe (B = −.095, SE = 2.38, p = 0.97, sr2 = 0.01) were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a trend toward significance for the interaction of condition with FFMQ-Nonreact (B = −5.90, SE = 3.14, p = 0.06, sr2 = 0.021) and FFMQ-Nonjudge (B = −3.67, SE = 1.90, p = 0.06, sr2 = 0.022).

    “There was a trend toward significance for the interaction of condition with FFMQ-Nonreact (B = −5.90, SE = 3.14, p = 0.06, sr2 = 0.021) and FFMQ-Nonjudge (B = −3.67, SE = 1.90, p = 0.06, sr2 = 0.022), whereas interactions with FFMQ-Observe (B = 3.80, SE = 3.03, p = 0.21, sr2 = 0.00) and FFMQ-Describe (B = −.095, SE = 2.38, p = 0.97, sr2 = 0.01) were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The main effect of FFMQ and the interaction of FFMQ and condition were non-significant for both the cold pressor (p > 0.30) and hyperventilation challenge (p > 0.50).

    “Similar to the task persistence results, the main effect of FFMQ and the interaction of FFMQ and condition were non-significant for both the cold pressor (p > 0.30) and hyperventilation challenge (p > 0.50).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Higher trait mindfulness is associated with greater self-reported distress tolerance and greater persistence on behavioral distress tolerance tasks.

    “individuals who are higher in trait mindfulness have been found to have greater scores on self-reported measures of DT”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “as well as greater task persistence on behavioral measures of DT”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hsu, Collins & Marlatt, 2013 source
    • cites Luberto et al., 2014 source
    • cites Arch & Craske, 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In people with borderline personality disorder, mindfulness instructions given after anger induction reduced anger and improved persistence on a difficult arithmetic task.

    “mindfulness instructions following an anger induction in individuals with borderline personality disorder led to decreased anger and increased task persistence during a cognitively challenging arithmetic task”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sauer & Baer, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    A brief mindfulness training can increase distress tolerance without changing the subjective experience of distress.

    “These results suggest that a brief mindfulness training can increase DT without affecting the subjective experience of distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During the cold pressor, mindfulness instructions produced longer persistence and lower distress ratings than spontaneous coping or distraction controls.

    “mindfulness-based instructions have been shown to lead to greater task persistence and reduced distress ratings compared to spontaneous coping and distraction controls during the cold pressor task”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Liu, Wang, Chang, Chen & Si, 2013 source
    • cites Masedo & Esteve, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness may increase distress tolerance by making distressing experiences seem less threatening and by shifting attention to current experience rather than negative reactions.

    “Mindfulness may increase DT by causing emotional or other distressing experiences to be seen as less threatening and unpleasant, and by refocusing attention toward the current experience rather than negative reactions about current distress”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lotan, Tanay & Bernstein, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The bootstrap procedure for estimating indirect effects provides greater power and Type 1 error control than traditional mediation approaches and does not assume a normal sampling distribution for the indirect effect.

    “This method provides greater power and Type 1 error control compared to traditional mediation approaches, and does not rely on the assumption that the sampling distribution of the indirect effect is normal (Hayes, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayes, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    For the hyperventilation challenge, tidal volume ratio data were missing for seven participants because of equipment failure.

    “For the hyperventilation challenge, data on tidal volume ratio from seven participants were missing as a result of equipment failure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The mindfulness intervention was based on MBCT principles, tested with clinicians, and refined using their feedback.

    “The mindfulness intervention used in this study was based off the principles of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy”
    • Also stated in: § Mindfulness Intervention · plain
      “Initial versions of the intervention were tested with several clinicians with expertise in mindfulness, and feedback was incorporated in order to refine the procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Segal, Williams & Teasdale, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Task order and condition were assigned by a computerized randomization algorithm before the first participant began.

    “Randomization of task order and condition was conducted using a computerized randomization algorithm prior to running the first participant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Participants who reached the maximum time at baseline were removed from that task's analyses to avoid artificially limiting improvement and to increase power.

    “participants who hit the maximum allotted time for each task at baseline were eliminated from analyses for that task. This was done in order to avoid artificially restricting improvements made from the first to second task, thereby increasing power to detect an effect of the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Mindfulness participants completed five multiple-choice comprehension questions, and the experimenter explained any incorrect answers.

    “those in the mindfulness condition answered five multiple choice questions to assess comprehension of the mindfulness training, and for any questions that the participants answered incorrectly, the experimenter provided an explanation of the correct response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    On the neutralization task, neutralizing actions and anxiety predict more obsessive-compulsive symptoms, especially obsessions, and also predict self-reported distress tolerance.

    “Neutralization behavior (e.g. crossing the written sentence out) and anxiety during this task have been shown to predict greater symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, particularly obsessions, as well as self-reported DT”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cougle et al., 2013 source
    • cites Cougle, Timpano, Fitch, & Hawkins, 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The DASS had Cronbach's alphas between 0.75 and 0.88 in the present sample.

    “Cronbach’s alpha in the present sample was between 0.75 and 0.88 for the three.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    People with higher trait mindfulness improved more in heat pain sensitivity after a short mindfulness training.

    “Reiner et al. (2015) found that higher trait mindfulness led to greater improvement in heat pain sensitivity following a brief mindfulness training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reiner et al. (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results may not generalize to other samples, particularly clinical populations, because the study used an unselected undergraduate sample.

    “Other limitations to this study include that it was conducted with an unselected undergraduate sample. Whether these results generalize to other samples, particularly clinical populations, remains to be tested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For the cold pressor task, 17 participants were eliminated because they reached the cutoff point during the pre-intervention task, leaving 90 participants for analysis.

    “Seventeen participants were eliminated from the analysis because they reached the cutoff point (180 seconds) during the pre-intervention task, leaving 90 participants for the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The distress tasks successfully induced distress, as mean changes in SUDS from before each task to peak were significantly different from zero for both cold pressor and hyperventilation.

    “Mean changes in SUDS from before each distress task to the peak were significantly different from zero, showing the tasks successfully induced distress (Cold Pressor: M = 39.61, SD = 22.20, t(89) = 16.93, p < 0.001, d = 1.78; Hyperventilation M = 32.82, SD = 19.68, t(93) = 16.17, p < 0.001, d = 1.67).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Gender was included as a covariate in the regression models.

    “Step one of each regression model included gender and either pre-intervention SUDS increase or task persistence for the relevant distress task. Gender was included as a covariate given previous literature suggesting differences in pain sensitivity and DT between men and women”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bunaciu et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There was no difference between participants randomized to the mindfulness and control conditions in gender, race, or age.

    “No difference was seen between participants randomized to the mindfulness (n = 53) or control (n = 54) conditions in gender (χ2 (1) = 0.23, p = 0.69, φ = 0.05), race (χ2 (3) = 2.24, p = 0.52, φ = 0.15), age (t(104) = 1.54, p = 0.13, d = 0.30).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Control participants heard calming music to match the time and possible relaxation from the mindfulness meditation.

    “Participants assigned to the control condition listened to relaxing music to account for time and any relaxing effects of the mindfulness meditation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In nicotine-deprived smokers, a short mindfulness intervention had no main effect on distress during hyperventilation, but it removed the link between low self-reported distress tolerance and distress in that task.

    “did not find a main effect of a brief mindfulness intervention on subjective distress during a hyperventilation challenge with nicotine-deprived smokers, though the intervention did eliminate the effect of low self-reported DT on distress during the task”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paz, Zvielli, Goldstein and Bernstein (2017) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The comparison condition controlled for practice effects on the cold pressor and hyperventilation tasks, time, and relaxation from the mindfulness meditation, but it did not include explicit instructions for how to respond to distress during the second set of tasks.

    “Although our comparison condition controlled for practice effects on the cold pressor and hyperventilation tasks, as well as the effect of time and feelings of relaxation resulting from the mindfulness meditation, it did not involve explicit instructions for how to respond to distress during the second set of tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Those reporting strong distress tied to a traumatic car accident memory were left out of the neutralization task to prevent confounding.

    “Participants who reported intense emotional distress resulting from a traumatic memory of a car accident were excluded from this task, as the distress related to such a memory could amplify the distress caused by imagining a similar event during the task, thereby confounding results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Control participants were monitored to ensure they stayed awake.

    “participants were merely instructed to listen to the music and were monitored to ensure they stayed awake.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Baseline differences in persistence between conditions led to the mirror tracing task being dropped from analysis.

    “this task was excluded from the analysis because of baseline differences in task persistence between the two experimental conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Multiple imputation with fully conditional specification was used to generate plausible values for the missing tidal volume ratio data.

    “We then used multiple imputation methods with fully conditional specification (van Buuren, 2007) to generate plausible values for the missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Buuren, 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The respiration signal was dimensionless and un-calibrated, so it could only be used as a within-subject ratio to assess tidal volume changes in one session.

    “The respiration signal is dimensionless and un-calibrated, and thus is only usable as a ratio within subjects to assess changes in tidal volume within a single experimental session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There was no difference between groups in baseline FFMQ, anxiety, stress, or depression.

    “Table 1 also shows there was no difference between groups in baseline FFMQ, anxiety, stress or depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The neutralization task was not given before the intervention to avoid priming neutralization behaviors and compliance problems.

    “Unlike the other tasks, the neutralization task was not administered prior to the intervention. Doing so may have compromised the validity of the second administration of the task by priming the use of neutralization behaviors due to prior questions about their use, as well as possible lack of compliance with rumination instructions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A power analysis using GPower indicated that a medium effect size (f2 = 0.15) for the main effect of intervention would require 68 participants to achieve 80% power at alpha .05 when relevant covariates are included.

    “Power analyses using GPower indicated that when including relevant covariates in the model, a medium effect size (f2 = 0.15) for the main effect of intervention would require a sample size of 68 to achieve 80% power with an alpha level of .05.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Assumptions of linear regression were tested, including normality, homoscedasticity, independence of residuals, absence of multicollinearity, and outliers, and the data were determined suitable for linear regression.

    “Assumptions of linear regression were tested, including normality, homoscedasticity and independence of residuals, absence of multicollinearity, and the presence of outliers. Data were determined to be suitable for linear regression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among daily smokers, a short mindfulness exercise had no impact on mirror-tracing persistence and only a marginal effect on self-reported distress.

    “a brief mindfulness exercise did not have any effect on task persistence in the mirror-tracing task in a sample of daily smokers, and had just a marginally significant effect on subjective distress”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Luberto and McLeish (2018) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Pre-post tidal volume ratio was included as a covariate for all analyses of the hyperventilation challenge.

    “Nonetheless, pre-post tidal volume ratio was included as a covariate for all analyses of the hyperventilation challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    For the cold pressor task, there was no difference in FFMQ, anxiety, depression, or stress scores between participants excluded from the analyses and those included.

    “There was no difference in FFMQ, anxiety, depression, or stress scores between participants who were excluded from the analyses and those who did not (ps > 0.24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The FFMQ had Cronbach's alphas from 0.67 to 0.91 for its five factors and 0.86 for the full scale.

    “Cronbach’s alpha for the five factors ranged from 0.67 to 0.91, and for the full scale was 0.86.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    For the hyperventilation challenge, 13 participants were eliminated because they reached the cutoff point during the pre-intervention task, leaving 94 participants for analysis.

    “Thirteen participants were eliminated from the analysis because they reached the cutoff point (300 seconds) during the pre-intervention task, leaving 94 participants for the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All mediation analyses included gender as a covariate, and pre-intervention task persistence was controlled for in the hyperventilation and cold pressor analyses.

    “All mediation analyses included gender as a covariate, and pre-intervention task persistence was also controlled for in the analyses of the hyperventilation and cold pressor tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Tidal volume was recorded to verify that breathing did not change after the mindfulness intervention, and it was used as a covariate.

    “Tidal volume throughout the task was also recorded to ensure that participants did not breathe differently after the mindfulness intervention, and this variable was included as a covariate in data analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There were no significant differences between conditions in number of participants included, baseline task persistence, or baseline SUDS increase for either the cold pressor or hyperventilation tasks.

    “There were no significant differences between conditions in number of participants included (i.e. participants who did not reach maximum time during first task), baseline task persistence, or baseline SUDS increase for either the Cold Pressor or Hyperventilation tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The number of tasks participants completed may have produced fatigue that affected their behavior and subjective distress.

    “Second, given the number of tasks that participants had to complete over the course of the experiment, there may have been an effect of fatigue on participants’ behavior and subjective distress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The Mindfulness Use Questions had reduced internal consistency because of the reverse-scored act with awareness item, so that item was removed; the remaining four items had alpha 0.81.

    “Internal consistency for the five items was diminished as a result of the reverse-scored item (Act with awareness), so the item was eliminated. With the remaining four items, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.81.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Changes in mindful non-reactivity mediate the effect of exposure therapy on health anxiety.

    “and that changes in mindful non-reactivity mediate the effect of exposure therapy on health anxiety (Hedman, Hesser, Andersson, Axelsson, & Ljótsson, 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hedman, Hesser, Andersson, Axelsson, & Ljótsson, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A brief present moment awareness training negates the impact of low self-reported distress tolerance on subjective distress.

    “and that a brief present moment awareness training negates the impact of low self-reported DT on subjective distress (Paz et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paz et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Performance on tasks requiring a substantial degree of self-control declines over time.

    “Research has shown that performance on tasks requiring a substantial degree of self-control declines over time (Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analytic research shows that among outcomes improved by mindfulness interventions, the largest effect sizes are seen on anxiety symptoms and the smallest on pain.

    “Meta-analytic research, for instance, has shown that of the many outcomes which mindfulness interventions have been shown to improve, the largest effect sizes are seen on symptoms of anxiety, while the smallest are seen for pain (Khoury et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khoury et al., 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Trait mindfulness significantly predicts task persistence.

    “it has been demonstrated that trait mindfulness significantly predicts task persistence (Arch & Craske, 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch & Craske, 2010 source
72 of 72
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this work, no one study had tested mindfulness across multiple distress tolerance tasks.

    “However, no single study has examined the effect of mindfulness across different tasks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The control condition controlled for all nonspecific effects of the mindfulness training other than mindfulness itself.

    “Participants assigned to the control condition listened to relaxing music to account for time and any relaxing effects of the mindfulness meditation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The self-report measure of mindfulness use during the tasks validly captures the mindfulness skills it is intended to measure.

    “Although such results did not extend to hyperventilation outcomes and were based on a novel measure of mindfulness use that has not previously been validated, they suggest that effects seen in this study were at least partly a result of mindfulness strategies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The comparison condition, which involved no instructions plus relaxing music, adequately controls for expectancy effects so that improvements in distress tolerance can be attributed to mindfulness skills rather than to merely employing a strategy.

    “A limitation of this design is that we cannot completely rule out the possibility that expectancy effects resulting from employing a strategy for responding to distress, rather than mindfulness skills themselves, accounted for improvements seen in DT.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have pointed to distress tolerance as one of the key mediators.

    “Previous studies have pointed to distress tolerance as one of the key mediators (e.g., Carpenter et al., 2019; Li et al., 2023b).”

    From Distress tolerance as a mediator of mindfulness-based intervention for anxiety and depression: Evidence from two randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as Carpenter et al., 2019

    The Results (Mediation Analyses) and Discussion identify distress tolerance as an outcome, not a mediator. They report that use of mindfulness skills—particularly nonreactivity and nonjudgment—mediated the training’s effects on distress-tolerance outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: χ2 (1) = 0.23, p = .69

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .69 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .632. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .69 · recomputed p = .632

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upχ²(1) = 0.23reported p = .69 · recomputed p = .632

    “χ2 (1) = 0.23, p = .69”

  • Consistentχ²(3) = 2.24reported p = .52 · recomputed p = .524

    “χ2 (3) = 2.24, p = .52”

  • Consistentt(104) = 1.54reported p = .13 · recomputed p = .127

    “t(104) = 1.54, p = .13”

  • Consistentt(89) = 16.93reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(89) = 16.93, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(93) = 16.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(93) = 16.17, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(46) = 1.45reported p = .15 · recomputed p = .154

    “t(46) = 1.45, p = .15”

  • Consistentt(48) = 1.04reported p = .3 · recomputed p = .304

    “t(48) = 1.04, p = .30”

  • Consistentt(92) = -1.48reported p = .14 · recomputed p = .142

    “t(92) = −1.48, p = .14”

8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Neutralization-behavior result is called significant despite p = 0.48

    Minor

    The reported p-value does not support the statement that mindfulness use significantly predicted neutralization behavior.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, J. K., Sanford, J., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
630-645
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897044317
Cited by
82
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness training, distress tolerance, stress reactivity, trait mindfulness, cold pressor task, task persistence, non-judgment, non-reactivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Awareness, Cold Temperature, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hyperventilation, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review