CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Dental materials and restorationsOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 196 of the 196 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors

Ercoli, Carlo, Caton, Jack G.·2018·Journal of Periodontology
DOI 10.1002/jper.16-0569
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives: This narrative review summarizes the current evidence about the role that the fabrication and presence of dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors have on the initiation and progression of gingivitis and periodontitis. Findings: Placement of restoration margins within the junctional epithelium and supracrestal connective tissue attachment can be associated with gingival inflammation and, potentially, recession. The presence of fixed prostheses finish lines within the gingival sulcus or the wearing of partial, removable dental prostheses does not cause gingivitis if patients are compliant with self‐performed plaque control and periodic maintenance. However, hypersensitivity reactions to the prosthesis dental material can be present. Procedures adopted for the fabrication of dental restorations and fixed prostheses have the potential to cause traumatic loss of periodontal supporting tissues. Tooth anatomic factors, root abnormalities, and fractures can act as plaque‐retentive factors and increase the likelihood of gingivitis and periodontitis. Conclusions: Tooth anatomic factors, such as root abnormalities and fractures, and tooth relationships in the dental arch and with the opposing dentition can enhance plaque retention. Restoration margins located within the gingival sulcus do not cause gingivitis if patients are compliant with self‐performed plaque control and periodic maintenance. Tooth‐supported and/or tooth‐retained restorations and their design, fabrication, delivery, and materials have often been associated with plaque retention and loss of attachment. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur to dental materials. Restoration margins placed within the junctional epithelium and supracrestal connective tissue attachment can be associated with inflammation and, potentially, recession. However, the evidence in several of the reviewed areas, especially related to the biologic mechanisms by which these factors affect the periodontium, is not conclusive. This highlights the need for additional well‐controlled animal studies to elucidate biologic mechanisms, as well as longitudinal prospective human trials. Adequate periodontal assessment and treatment, appropriate instructions, and motivation in self‐performed plaque control and compliance to maintenance protocols appear to be the most important factors to limit or avoid potential negative effects on the periodontium caused by fixed and removable prostheses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jper.16-0569

Cites

196 of 196 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Barboza EP, 2008, Supracrestal gingival tissue measurement in healthy human periodontum, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 28, 55
  2. Bjorn AL, 1969, Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. I. Metal fillings, Odontol Revy, 20, 311
  3. Einarsdottir E, A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement [published online ahead of print 2017], J Prosthet Dent
  4. Ogunrinde TJ, 2014, The influence of the design of mandibular major connectors on gingival health, Afr J Med Med Sci, 43, 29
  5. Bartok RI, 2012, External radicular resorption: selected cases and review of the literature, J Med Life, 5, 145
  6. El‐Mangoury NH, 1987, Mandibular anterior crowding and periodontal disease, Angle Orthod, 57, 33
  7. Jacobson L, 1972, Crowding and gingivitis: a comparison between mouth breathers and nose breathers, Scand J Dent Res, 80, 500

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ercoli, C., & Caton, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ercoli, Carlo
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06
Volume
89
Issue
S1
Pages
S223-S236
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
DOI
10.1002/jper.16-0569
OpenAlex
W2808766351
Cited by
105
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 20 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
prosthodontics, gingivitis, periodontitis, restoration margins, junctional epithelium, gingival recession, plaque retention, tooth fracture, removable partial dentures, fixed prostheses, plaque control, periodontal maintenance
MeSH terms
Dental Plaque, Gingivitis, Humans, Periodontitis, Prospective Studies, Dental Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review