Cited by 36Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesSkin Protection and Aging

Effect of the skincare product on facial skin microbial structure and biophysical parameters: A pilot study

Open access
Hwang, Bo Kyoung, Lee, Sado, Myoung, Joonoh, Hwang, Seung Jin, Lim, Jun Man, Jeong, Eui Taek, Park, Sun Gyoo, Youn, Sung Hun·2021·MicrobiologyOpen

Abstract

Daily use of cosmetics is known to affect the skin microbiome. This study aimed to determine the bacterial community structure and skin biophysical parameters following the daily application of a skincare product on the face. Twenty‐five Korean women, who used the same skincare product for four weeks participated in the study. During this period, skin hydration, texture, sebum content, and pH were measured, and skin swab samples were collected on the cheeks. The microbiota was analyzed using the MiSeq system. Through these experiments, bacterial diversity in facial skin increased and the microbial community changed after four weeks of skincare product application. The relative abundance of Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus increased, significant changes in specific bacterial modules of the skin microbial network were observed, and skin hydration and texture improved. It was suggested that daily use of skincare products could affect the microbial structure of facial skin as well as the biophysical properties of the facial skin. These findings expand our understanding of the role of skincare products on the skin environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mbo3.1236

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, B. K., Lee, S., Myoung, J., Hwang, S. J., Lim, J. M., Jeong, E. T., Park, S. G., & Youn, S. H.
Affiliations
LG (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Youn, Sung Hun
Venue
MicrobiologyOpen
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e1236-e1236
ISSN
2045-8827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206472125
Cited by
36
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MicrobiologyOpen (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
skin care products, skin hydration, skin texture, sebum content, skin pH, Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, bacterial co-occurrence networks
MeSH terms
Adult, Cheek, Cosmetics, Face, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Biodiversity, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review