Cited by 94Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, DietBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Changes in body composition over 8 years in a randomized trial of a lifestyle intervention: The look AHEAD study

Open access
Pownall, Henry J., Bray, George A., Wagenknecht, Lynne E., Walkup, Michael P., Heshka, Stanley, Hubbard, Van S., Hill, James, Kahn, Steven E. +4 more·2015·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention versus a comparison group on body composition in obese or overweight persons with type 2 diabetes at baseline and at 1, 4, and 8 years. Methods: Body composition was measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry in a subset of 1019 Look AHEAD study volunteers randomized to intervention or comparison groups. The intervention was designed to achieve and maintain ≥7% weight loss through increased physical activity and reduced caloric intake. The comparison group received social support and diabetes education. Results: At 1 year, the intervention group lost fat (5.6 ± 0.2 kg) and lean mass (2.3 ± 0.1 kg) but regained fat (∼100%) and lost lean mass between years 1 and 8. Between baseline and year 8, weight loss was greater in intervention versus comparison groups (4.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 kg); comparison group weight loss was mostly lean mass (2.1 ± 0.17 kg). Fat mass in the intervention group was lower than that of the comparison group at all post‐baseline time points. Conclusions: Reduced fat mass may place the intervention group at a lower risk of obesity‐linked sequelae, a hypothesis that can be tested by future studies of this cohort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21005

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment discontinuation typically results in rapid weight regain, with the majority of this gain attributed to increases in fat mass.

    “treatment discontinuation typically results in rapid weight regain4,9,10, with the majority of this gain attributed to increases in fat mass11–13”

    From GDF8 and activin A blockade protects against GLP-1–induced muscle loss while enhancing fat loss in obese male mice and non-human primates (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that weight regained by the intervention group between years 1 and 8 was approximately 100% fat mass, supporting the fat-mass portion of the claim. But the Methods > Interventions section says the intervention continued through years 2–8; this study does not establish rapid regain after treatment discontinuation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Body weight regained after stopping treatment is likely disproportionately composed of adipose tissue, with little regain of lean mass and little increase in energy expenditure.

    “Furthermore, it is likely the body weight regained after stopping treatment is disproportionately composed of adipose tissue, with little regain of lean mass and little increase in energy expenditure.”

    From Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin‐mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that weight regained from years 1 to 8 in the intervention group was approximately 100% fat mass, with little change in lean mass. But the Methods say the intervention continued during years 2–8, so these findings are not about regain after stopping treatment. The paper does not report an increase in energy expenditure during regain. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The initial loss of lean mass in the Look AHEAD ILI condition is of concern because weight regain brought no increase in lean mass.

    “The initial loss of lean mass in the ILI condition is of concern because the weight regain in that group brought no increase in lean mass [31].”
  • In Look AHEAD, the ILI group lost fat and lean mass in the first year, but regained fat and lost lean mass between years 1 and 8.

    “The ILI group lost fat (− 5.6 ± 0.2 kg) and lean mass (− 2.3 ± 0.1 kg) in the first year, but regained fat (∼100%) and lost lean mass between years 1 and 8.”
  • Long-term follow-up studies of RCTs that resulted in weight loss show that weight regain following significant intentional weight loss is comprised predominantly of fat mass.

    “This finding is echoed in the few long-term follow-up studies of RCTs that resulted in weight loss, where weight regain following significant intentional weight loss is shown to be comprised predominantly of fat mass.13, 24, 25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pownall, H. J., Bray, G. A., Wagenknecht, L. E., Walkup, M. P., Heshka, S., Hubbard, V. S., Hill, J., Kahn, S. E., Nathan, D. M., Schwartz, A. V., Johnson, K. C., & the Look AHEAD Research Group
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco California USA
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wagenknecht, Lynne E.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
565-572
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1506839237
Cited by
94
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (U01-DK-57136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
body composition, type 2 diabetes, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, fat mass, lean body mass, weight regain, physical activity, caloric restriction, social support, diabetes education
MeSH terms
Aged, Behavior Therapy, Body Composition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss, Absorptiometry, Photon, Caloric Restriction, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review