Cited by 24Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Rejection sensitivity and negative self‐beliefs as mediators of associations between the number of borderline personality disorder features and self‐reported adult attachment

Boldero, Jennifer M., Hulbert, Carol A., Bloom, Lisa, Cooper, Jae, Gilbert, Flora, Mooney, Jessica L., Salinger, Jodi·2009·Personality and Mental Health

Abstract

Abstract The present two studies examine associations between self‐reported adult anxious and avoidant attachment and the number of borderline personality disorder (BPD) features reported by student samples. In addition, they examine the mediating roles of rejection sensitivity (RS) (Studies 1 and 2) and negative self‐beliefs (Study 2) on associations, independent of neuroticism. In both studies, higher anxious and avoidant attachment were associated with reporting more features, and RS partially mediated these associations. In Study 2, the self‐belief negativity was an additional mediator. These factors partially mediated the impact of anxious attachment and fully mediated that of avoidant attachment. The results are consistent with an attachment‐based model of BPD that highlights the role of internal working models of self and others as antecedents of the sensitivity to rejection seen in many with BPD. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmh.93

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study identified a significant correlation when neuroticism was controlled for.

    “Similarly, one study identified a significant correlation when neuroticism was controlled for (Boldero et al., 2009), whilst another indicated the effect of RS on BPD symptom severity was mediated by self-esteem (Bungert, Liebke, et al., 2015).”
  • Shared variance between RS and BPD symptoms did not reach 40% in one study and 10% in another.

    “For instance, shared variance between variables, including RS and BPD symptoms, did not reach 40% in one study (Boldero et al., 2009) and 10% in another (Tragesser, Lippman, Trull, & Barrett, 2008), and not all participants with BPD reported elevated RS (Winter et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boldero, J. M., Hulbert, C. A., Bloom, L., Cooper, J., Gilbert, F., Mooney, J. L., & Salinger, J.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Boldero, Jennifer M.
Venue
Personality and Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
248-262
ISSN
  • 1932-8621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-863X
OpenAlex
W1991349215
Cited by
24
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, borderline personality traits, rejection sensitivity, negative self-beliefs, adult attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, internal working models, mediation, neuroticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review