The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The next generation of insecticides: dsRNA is stable as a foliar‐applied insecticide
Abstract
BACKGROUND: RNAi is a powerful tool used to study gene function. It also has been hypothesized to be a promising new method for control of insect pests on crops, although the perceived instability of dsRNA in the environment has constrained thinking about the options for this new type of pest control. RESULTS: We confirmed that foliar application of Colorado potato beetle dsRNA actin is highly effective for control, demonstrated that treatment with actin‐dsRNA protects potato plants for at least 28 days under greenhouse conditions and found that the dsRNA is not readily removed by water once dried on the leaves. CONCLUSION: These new results suggest that foliar application of dsRNA could be a valuable control strategy for some pests. Technological aspects of spraying dsRNA that need to be considered in the future are discussed. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bolognesi, R., Ramaseshadri, P., Anderson, J., Bachman, P., Clinton, W., Flannagan, R., Ilagan, O., Lawrence, C., Levine, S., Moar, W., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047534 · Cited by 473
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-387680-5.00002-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127004 · DOI
- 10.1111/1744-7917.12006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2013.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.C200523200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00839.x · DOI
- 10.14411/eje.2008.108 · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.2048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-387680-5.00003-3 · DOI
- Niblett CL, 2012, Potential applications of gene silencing or RNA interference (RNAi) to control disease and insect pests of date palm, Emir J Food Agric, 24, 462
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a003640 · DOI · Paper page
- Niu J‐H, 2010, RNAi technology extends its reach: engineering plant resistance against harmful eukaryotes, Afr J Biotechnol, 9, 7573
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.341.6147.732 · DOI
- 10.1525/bio.2013.63.8.8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12010-013-0399-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.069 · DOI
- 10.1093/besa/33.3.142 · DOI · Paper page
- Jolivet P, 1991, Le doryphore menace l'Asie Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say 1824 (Col. Chrysomelidae), L'Entomologiste, 47, 29
- 10.1039/b314847p · doi:10.1039/b314847p
- 10.1093/ee/14.3.343 · doi:10.1093/ee/14.3.343
- 10.4039/Ent1031049-7 · doi:10.4039/ent1031049-7
- 10.1093/ee/19.1.117 · doi:10.1093/ee/19.1.117
- Gauthier NL, 1981, Advances in Potato Pest Management, 13
- 10.1007/s12230-008-9052-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Whalon ME, 2014, The MSU Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database
- 10.1002/ps.2780350304 · doi:10.1002/ps.2780350304
- 10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.447 · doi:10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.447
- 10.1002/ps.1120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ps.1305 · doi:10.1002/ps.1305
- Gelman D, 2000, Last Meal for Colorado Potato Beetle?
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0093155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0016672308009853 · doi:10.1017/s0016672308009853
- 10.1186/s13059-014-0466-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90511-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/chem.200305731 · DOI
- Tevini M, 1985, Allgemeine Photobiologie
- Hunter WB, 2012, Advances in RNA interference: dsRNA treatment in trees and grapevines for insect pest suppression, SWest Entomol, 37, 85
Cited by
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L. C., Genovesi, P., et al. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12627 · Cited by 2,234
“…introducing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into cells to destabilize messenger RNA, has been studied especially for applications to human health and agriculture, but with much research also aimed at getting targeted invasive species to eat substances including dsRNA (e.g. San Miguel & Scott, 2016).”
BackgroundBidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection
Wang, M., Weiberg, A., Lin, F.-M., Thomma, B. P. H. J., Huang, H.-D., & Jin, H. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.151 · Cited by 801
Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges of Insect RNA Interference
Zhu, K. Y., & Palli, S. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025224 · Cited by 709
RNA interference technology in crop protection against arthropod pests, pathogens and nematodes
Zotti, M., dos Santos, E. A., Cagliari, D., Christiaens, O., Taning, C. N. T., & Smagghe, G. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4813 · Cited by 465
Yan, S., Ren, B., & Shen, J. (2021) · Insect Science · doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12822 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- San Miguel, K., & Scott, J. G.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 801-809
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2133750453
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Hatch Project (139-7490)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
