The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective
Abstract
This paper includes an empirical analysis of the linkages between environmental strategy and stakeholder management. First, it is shown that several simultaneous improvements in various resource domains are required for firms to shift to an empirically significant, higher level of proactiveness. Second, more proactive environmental strategies are associated with a deeper and broader coverage of stakeholders. Third, environmental leadership is not associated with a rising importance of environmental regulations, thereby suggesting a role for voluntary cooperation between firms and government. Finally, the linkages between environmental strategies and stakeholder management, based on a sample of 197 firms operating in Belgium, appear more limited than expected. Country‐specific characteristics may to a large extent account for these results. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Environmental risk management and the cost of capital
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.678 · Cited by 1,530
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies
Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.796 · Cited by 1,093
Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions
Ren, S., Tang, G., & E. Jackson, S. (2018) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-017-9532-1 · Cited by 1,002
Market-oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions
Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Pinney, C. C. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0217-2 · Cited by 409
A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change
Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612463319 · Cited by 304
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective
Rivera‐Camino, J. (2007) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560710821206 · Cited by 270
Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains
Marchi, V. D., Maria, E. D., & Micelli, S. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1738 · Cited by 254
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Lisi, I. E. (2015) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001 · Cited by 225
Environmental leadership and consciousness development: A case study among Canadian SMEs
Boiral, O., Baron, C., & Gunnlaugson, O. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1845-5 · Cited by 216
HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations
Ren, S., & Jackson, S. E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691 · Cited by 175
Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., Fonseca, S. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.018 · Cited by 172
Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management
Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031 · Cited by 163
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157
Dahlmann, F., & Grosvold, J. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.65 · Cited by 122
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
Graham, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.005 · Cited by 79
Kardos, M., Gabor, M. R., & Cristache, N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030873 · Cited by 76
Khalid, S. K., Beattie, C., & Sands, J. S. (2022) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-09-2020-0325 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 453-470
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2171278069
- Cited by
- 2,119
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
