The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The IPCC and the new map of science and politics
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we review work which seeks to understand and interpret the place of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) within the science and politics of climate change in the context of a post‐Paris polycentric governance regime and the culture of “post‐truth” politics. Focusing on studies of how the IPCC has sought to maintain a boundary between the scientific and the political, we offer an historical account of “boundary work” within the IPCC which is instructive for thinking, in an anticipative mode, about emerging and likely challenges to the IPCC's position as a science–policy boundary organization. We suggest that the relationships between climate science and policy are undergoing fundamental transformation in light of the Paris Agreement, and contend that the IPCC will need to be nimble and reflexive in meeting new challenges. Growing calls for more “solution‐oriented” assessment question the IPCC's positioning at the science—politics boundary, where it can function to put some policy options on the table, while obscuring others. Recent controversies over proposed mitigation solutions are indicative of likely future challenges. We suggest that by adopting a mode of “responsible assessment,” the IPCC can continue to exercise its world‐making power in a relevant and legitimate fashion. This article is categorized under:Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,584
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095325 · Cited by 4,838
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems
Ostrom, E. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · Cited by 4,529
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-6243 · Cited by 3,579
(2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203413845 · Cited by 2,963
States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order
Jasanoff, S. (2004) · Cited by 2,942
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710004068 · Cited by 2,047
Stirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction
Guston, D. H. (2001) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390102600401 · Cited by 1,474
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252
Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2392 · Cited by 1,114
Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-2422 · Cited by 1,096
Aybar, A. (2017) · Revista de Sociología · doi:10.15381/rsoc.v0i25.19057 · Cited by 907
Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2572 · Cited by 875
The construction of global warming and the politics of science
Demeritt, D. (2001) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00245 · Cited by 729
Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5511 · Cited by 660
The Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change
Abbott, K. W. (2012) · Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c11127 · Cited by 582
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108 · Cited by 568
Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports
Ford, J. D., Cameron, L., Rubis, J., Maillet, M., Nakashima, D., Willox, A. C., & Pearce, T. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2954 · Cited by 488
Miller, C. (2001) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390102600405 · Cited by 450
Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge☆
Hulme, M. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005 · Cited by 439
Hajer, M. A. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281671.001.0001 · Cited by 424
Co‐production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives
Bremer, S., & Meisch, S. (2017) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.482 · Cited by 407
Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?
Hulme, M., & Mahony, M. (2010) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133310373719 · Cited by 400
Self-citationThree years to safeguard our climate
Figueres, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Whiteman, G., Rockström, J., Hobley, A., & Rahmstorf, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/546593a · Cited by 399
Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity
Wynne, B. (1993) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003 · Cited by 395
Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government?
Oels, A. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/15239080500339661 · Cited by 364
Paranoia within reason : a casebook on conspiracy as explanation
Marcus, G. E. (1999) · Cited by 350
Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?
Wynne, B. (2002) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392102050003010 · Cited by 342
Sismondo, S. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717692076 · Cited by 312
1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement
Hulme, M. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2939 · Cited by 306
No funeral bells: Public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age
Jasanoff, S., & Simmet, H. R. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717731936 · Cited by 298
Global environmental assessments : information and influence
Mitchell, R. B. (2006) · Cited by 297
Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics
(2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203797693 · Cited by 290
Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism?
Eckersley, R. (2012) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00107 · Cited by 287
Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Agrawala, S. (1998) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1005315532386 · Cited by 274
Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation
Beck, S. (2011) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2 · Cited by 271
Self-citationOppenheimer, M., O'Neill, B. C., Webster, M., & Agrawala, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144831 · Cited by 265
Producing the Climate: States, Scientists, and the Constitution of Global Governance Objects
Allan, B. B. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000321 · Cited by 263
Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community
Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., Risbey, J. S., Newell, B. R., & Smithson, M. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013 · Cited by 260
Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy
Victor, D. G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/520027a · Cited by 256
Climate change and knowledge politics
Grundmann, R. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701251656 · Cited by 255
In defence of the value free ideal
Betz, G. (2013) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x · Cited by 252
Hajer, M. A., & Pelzer, P. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.013 · Cited by 247
Anderson, K. (2015) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2559 · Cited by 231
Klenk, N., Fiume, A., Meehan, K., & Gibbes, C. (2017) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.475 · Cited by 226
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008 · Cited by 224
Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report
Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H., & Paterson, M. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2782 · Cited by 221
Anticipating climate futures in a 1.5 °C era: the link between foresight and governance
Vervoort, J., & Gupta, A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.004 · Cited by 208
History of the 2°C climate target
Randalls, S. (2010) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.62 · Cited by 201
Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments
Edenhofer, O., & Kowarsch, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017 · Cited by 200
Epistemic geographies of climate change: Science, space and politics
Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132516681485 · Cited by 199
Self-citationWhat does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity
Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., & Hulme, M. (2016) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004 · Cited by 193
Gustafsson, K. M., & Lidskog, R. (2017) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.001 · Cited by 184
Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services
Borie, M., & Hulme, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009 · Cited by 182
Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus
Pearce, W., Brown, B., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2015) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.366 · Cited by 180
The IPCC and the politics of anticipation
Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3264 · Cited by 170
Self-citationLost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change
Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., & Cairns, R. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.225 · Cited by 169
Fast growing research on negative emissions
Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Bornmann, L., & Fuss, S. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ee5 · Cited by 169
Unleashing expert judgment in assessment
Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Freeman, P. T., & Field, C. B. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.005 · Cited by 168
The politics of anticipation: the IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience
Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2018) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2018.7 · Cited by 161
Self-citationRapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications
Buck, H. J. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6 · Cited by 154
Envisioning REDD + in a post‐Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice
Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Weatherley‐Singh, J., Vijge, M. J., de Koning, J., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Herold, M., & Lederer, M. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.425 · Cited by 152
When Does Science Matter? International Relations Meets Science and Technology Studies
Lidskog, R., & Sundqvist, G. (2014) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00269 · Cited by 150
The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking
Geden, O. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.427 · Cited by 150
Geopolitan Democracy in the Anthropocene
Eckersley, R. (2017) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321717695293 · Cited by 147
Aykut, S. C., Foyer, J., & Morena, E. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315560595 · Cited by 147
Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed
van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., van Sluisveld, M. A. E., & Riahi, K. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 · Cited by 144
Swart, R. J., Bernstein, L., Ha‐Duong, M., & Petersen, A. C. (2008) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7 · Cited by 140
Global climate protection policy: the limits of scientific advice
Boehmer-Christiansen, S. A. (1994) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/0959-3780(94)90002-7 · Cited by 138
Stilgoe, J. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315849195 · Cited by 127
Elzinga, A. (1997) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901897036003002 · Cited by 125
Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC's Assessment of Mitigation
Hughes, H., & Paterson, M. (2017) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12255 · Cited by 120
Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., & Vaughan, N. E. (2014) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662514548628 · Cited by 118
Gupta, A., & Möller, I. (2018) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1452373 · Cited by 110
Beatty, J., & Moore, A. (2010) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2010.0203 · Cited by 107
Mapping the climate change challenge
Stéphane Hallegatte, A., Rogelj, J., Allen, M. R., Clarke, L., Edenhofer, O., Field, C. B., Friedlingstein, P., van Kesteren, L., Knutti, R., Mach, K. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3057 · Cited by 106
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities
Vardy, M., Oppenheimer, M., Dubash, N. K., O’Reilly, J., & Jamieson, D. W. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053 · Cited by 105
Between Tribalism and Trust: The IPCC Under the "Public Microscope"
Beck, S. (2012) · Nature and Culture · doi:10.3167/nc.2012.070203 · Cited by 102
Self-citationCosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology
Jasanoff, S. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0009 · Cited by 102
Lem, C. H., Zerriffi, H., & Kandlikar, M. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.007 · Cited by 100
The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments—the case of the IPCC
Siebenhüner, B. (2003) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(03)00023-2 · Cited by 100
Global climate protection policy: the limits of scientific advice☆Part 1
Boehmer-Christiansen, S. A. (1994) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/0959-3780(94)90049-3 · Cited by 97
Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
Morin, J., Louafi, S., Orsini, A. J., & Oubenal, M. (2016) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8 · Cited by 94
Sundqvist, G., Bohlin, I., Hermansen, E. A. T., & Yearley, S. (2015) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312715583737 · Cited by 91
Obermeister, N. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.010 · Cited by 89
The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: learning lessons from the EU
Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. (2016) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1248887 · Cited by 85
Socio-political prioritization of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Fridahl, M. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.050 · Cited by 85
O’Reilly, J., Орескес, Н., & Oppenheimer, M. (2012) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312712448130 · Cited by 83
Flegal, J. A., & Gupta, A. (2017) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-017-9377-6 · Cited by 83
Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES Legitimization Politics
Esguerra, A., Beck, S., & Lidskog, R. (2016) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00390 · Cited by 76
Self-citationDefine limits for temperature overshoot targets
Geden, O., & Löschel, A. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-017-0026-z · Cited by 75
Climate change and the geographies of objectivity: the case of the IPCC 's burning embers diagram
Mahony, M. (2014) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12064 · Cited by 74
Self-citationScience advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC
Pearce, W., Mahony, M., & Raman, S. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.017 · Cited by 73
Self-citationModelling and the Nation: Institutionalising Climate Prediction in the UK, 1988–92
Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2016) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9302-0 · Cited by 70
Self-citationBourdieu and the IPCC’s Symbolic Power
Hughes, H. (2015) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00323 · Cited by 69
Winickoff, D. E., & Mondou, M. (2016) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312716667855 · Cited by 69
Yamineva, Y. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.005 · Cited by 67
Montana, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.011 · Cited by 65
One world or two? Science–policy interactions in the climate field
Sundqvist, G., Gasper, D., Clair, A. L. S., Hermansen, E. A. T., Yearley, S., Tvedten, I. Ø., & Wynne, B. (2017) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1374193 · Cited by 63
Epistemic Subsidiarity – Coexistence, Cosmopolitanism, Constitutionalism
Jasanoff, S. (2013) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/s1867299x00003305 · Cited by 62
Mahony, M. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.005 · Cited by 61
Self-citationYohe, G., & Oppenheimer, M. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0176-8 · Cited by 61
From constitutional rule to loosely coupled spheres of liquid authority: a reflexive approach
Zürn, M. (2017) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971916000270 · Cited by 61
Aykut, S. C. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.391 · Cited by 60
Fogel, C. (2005) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-005-1749-7 · Cited by 57
The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: the case of Germany
Beck, S. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.151 · Cited by 57
Self-citationSelf-Governance and Peer Review in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report
Edwards, P. N., & Schneider, S. H. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1789.003.0010 · Cited by 57
How Earth Science Has Become a Social Science
Орескес, Н. (2015) · Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · doi:10.12759/hsr.40.2015.2.246-270 · Cited by 54
The necessary and inaccessible 1.5°C objective
Guillemot, H. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315560595-3 · Cited by 54
Hajer, M. A. (2012) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.730758 · Cited by 53
European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC)
Fears, R., & ter Meulen, V. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777141.019 · Cited by 52
Dooley, K., & Gupta, A. (2016) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-016-9331-z · Cited by 52
IPCC gazing and the interpretative social sciences
Shackley, S. J., & Skodvin, T. (1995) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/0959-3780(95)00021-f · Cited by 51
Climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering
Parson, E. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713456114 · Cited by 50
Political experiments that matter: Ordering democracy from experimental sites
Laurent, B. (2016) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312716668587 · Cited by 49
The epistemic authority of solution-oriented global environmental assessments
Haas, P. M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.013 · Cited by 48
Institutional Accountability of Nonstate Actors in the UNFCCC: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
Kuyper, J. W., Bäckstrand, K., & Schroeder, H. (2016) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12213 · Cited by 47
The futures of climate engineering
Low, S. (2016) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1002/2016ef000442 · Cited by 45
Climate expertise: between scientific credibility and geopolitical imperatives
Dahan, A. (2008) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1179/030801808x259961 · Cited by 39
Science as a “fixed point”? Quantification and boundary objects in international climate politics
Lahn, B., & Sundqvist, G. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.001 · Cited by 38
Endfield, G. H., & Morris, C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0416-6 · Cited by 28
Turning the focus to solutions
Lee, H. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8954 · Cited by 28
The treatment of divergent viewpoints in global environmental assessments
Kowarsch, M., Flachsland, C., Garard, J., Jabbour, J., & Riousset, P. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.001 · Cited by 21
Himmelsbach, R. (2017) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scx053 · Cited by 21
INEA editorial: Achieving 1.5 °C and climate justice
Dooley, K., Gupta, J., & Patwardhan, A. (2018) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-018-9389-x · Cited by 11
Rethinking IPCC Expertise from a Multi-actor Perspective
Devès, M. H., Lang, M., Bourrelier, P., & Valérian, F. (2018) · Springer climate · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74669-2_4 · Cited by 3
Cited by
van Beek, L., Hajer, M., Pelzer, P., van Vuuren, D., & Cassen, C. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102191 · Cited by 282
Futures literacy and the diversity of the future
Mangnus, A. C., Oomen, J., Vervoort, J. M., & Hajer, M. A. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102793 · Cited by 181
Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement
Dooley, K., Holz, C., Kartha, S., Klinsky, S., Roberts, J. T., Shue, H., Winkler, H., Athanasiou, T., Caney, S., Cripps, E., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01015-8 · Cited by 162
Hansson, A., Fridahl, M., Haikola, S., Yanda, P., Pauline, N., & Mabhuye, E. (2020) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00517-y · Cited by 35
The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates
Russo, G., Horta Ribeiro, M., Davidson, T. R., Veselovsky, V., & West, R. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757667 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, S., & Mahony, M.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2888476021
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.