Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Holographic duals of evaporating black holes

Emparan, Roberto, Luna, Raimon, Suzuki, Ryotaku, Tomašević, Marija, Way, Benson·2023·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We describe the dynamical evaporation of a black hole as the classical evolution in time of a black hole in an Anti-de Sitter braneworld. A bulk black hole whose horizon intersects the brane yields the classical bulk dual of a black hole coupled to quantum conformal fields. The evaporation of this black hole happens when the bulk horizon slides off the brane, making the horizon on the brane shrink. We use a large-D effective theory of the bulk Einstein equations to solve the time evolution of these systems. With this method, we study the dual evaporation of a variety of black holes interacting with colder radiation baths. We also obtain the dual of the collapse of holographic radiation to form a black hole on the brane. Finally, we discuss the evolution of the Page curve of the radiation in our evaporation setups, with entanglement islands appearing and then shrinking during the decreasing part of the curve.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep05(2023)182

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and T. Wiseman, Holographic thermal field theory on curved spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 063001 [arXiv:1312.0612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  2. T. Tanaka, Classical black hole evaporation in Randall-Sundrum infinite brane world, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 148 (2003) 307 [gr-qc/0203082] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. R. Emparan, A. Fabbri and N. Kaloper, Quantum black holes as holograms in AdS brane worlds, JHEP 08 (2002) 043 [hep-th/0206155] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. P. Figueras, J. Lucietti and T. Wiseman, Ricci solitons, Ricci flow, and strongly coupled CFT in the Schwarzschild Unruh or Boulware vacua, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 215018 [arXiv:1104.4489] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. P. Figueras and T. Wiseman, Gravity and large black holes in Randall-Sundrum II braneworlds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 081101 [arXiv:1105.2558] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. N. Tanahashi and T. Tanaka, Time-symmetric initial data of large brane-localized black hole in RS-II model, JHEP 03 (2008) 041 [arXiv:0712.3799] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. K. Kashiyama, N. Tanahashi, A. Flachi and T. Tanaka, Quantum back reaction to asymptotically AdS black holes, JHEP 01 (2010) 099 [arXiv:0910.5376] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. S. Abdolrahimi, C. Cattoën, D.N. Page and S. Yaghoobpour-Tari, Large Randall-Sundrum II Black Holes, Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 405 [arXiv:1206.0708] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. Abdolrahimi, C. Cattoën, D.N. Page and S. Yaghoobpour-Tari, Spectral methods in general relativity and large Randall-Sundrum II black holes, JCAP 06 (2013) 039 [arXiv:1212.5623] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson and S. Giri, Dark bubbles and black holes, JHEP 09 (2021) 158 [arXiv:2102.02164] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. P. Figueras and S. Tunyasuvunakool, CFTs in rotating black hole backgrounds, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 125015 [arXiv:1304.1162] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. W.D. Biggs and J.E. Santos, Rotating Black Holes in Randall-Sundrum II Braneworlds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 021601 [arXiv:2108.00016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. R. Gregory, S.F. Ross and R. Zegers, Classical and quantum gravity of brane black holes, JHEP 09 (2008) 029 [arXiv:0802.2037] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, Black strings and p-branes are unstable, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2837 [hep-th/9301052] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. A.L. Fitzpatrick, L. Randall and T. Wiseman, On the existence and dynamics of braneworld black holes, JHEP 11 (2006) 033 [hep-th/0608208] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. N. Kaloper, Cutoffs, Stretched Horizons and Black Hole Radiators, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 104052 [arXiv:1203.3455] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02 (2008) 045 [arXiv:0712.2456] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos and N.A. Obers, Essentials of Blackfold Dynamics, JHEP 03 (2010) 063 [arXiv:0910.1601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. T. Hirayama and G. Kang, Stable black strings in anti-de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064010 [hep-th/0104213] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. D. Marolf and J.E. Santos, Phases of Holographic Hawking Radiation on spatially compact spacetimes, JHEP 10 (2019) 250 [arXiv:1906.07681] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. R. Emparan et al., Black tsunamis and naked singularities in AdS, JHEP 02 (2022) 090 [arXiv:2112.07967] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. D. Licht, R. Suzuki and B. Way, The large D effective theory of black strings in AdS, JHEP 12 (2022) 146 [arXiv:2211.04333] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. S. Bhattacharyya et al., A membrane paradigm at large D, JHEP 04 (2016) 076 [arXiv:1504.06613] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  24. S. Bhattacharyya, M. Mandlik, S. Minwalla and S. Thakur, A Charged Membrane Paradigm at Large D, JHEP 04 (2016) 128 [arXiv:1511.03432] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  25. Y. Dandekar, S. Mazumdar, S. Minwalla and A. Saha, Unstable ‘black branes’ from scaled membranes at large D, JHEP 2016 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1609.02912]. · DOI
  26. R. Emparan and C.P. Herzog, Large D limit of Einstein’s equations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (2020) 045005 [arXiv:2003.11394]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe, Evolution and End Point of the Black String Instability: Large D Solution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 091102 [arXiv:1506.06772] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. T. Andrade, R. Emparan, D. Licht and R. Luna, Black hole collisions, instabilities, and cosmic censorship violation at large D, JHEP 2019 (2019) 99 [arXiv:1908.03424]. · DOI
  29. R. Luna and M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, Holographic collisions in large D effective theory, JHEP 02 (2023) 147 [arXiv:2212.14440] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. D. Wang and M.W. Choptuik, Black hole formation in Randall-Sundrum II braneworlds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 011102 [arXiv:1604.04832] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. T. Andrade, R. Emparan and D. Licht, Rotating black holes and black bars at large D, JHEP 09 (2018) 107 [arXiv:1807.01131] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. T. Andrade et al., Entropy production and entropic attractors in black hole fusion and fission, JHEP 08 (2020) 098 [arXiv:2005.14498] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. J.E. Santos and B. Way, Black Droplets, JHEP 08 (2014) 072 [arXiv:1405.2078] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. T. Wiseman, Static axisymmetric vacuum solutions and nonuniform black strings, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 1137 [hep-th/0209051] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. R. Emparan, G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, Exact description of black holes on branes. II. Comparison with BTZ black holes and black strings, JHEP 01 (2000) 021 [hep-th/9912135] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Black Strings, Low Viscosity Fluids, and Violation of Cosmic Censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 101102 [arXiv:1006.5960] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. R. Emparan et al., Phases and Stability of Non-Uniform Black Strings, JHEP 05 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1802.08191] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. D. Neuenfeld, Homology conditions for RT surfaces in double holography, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 075009 [arXiv:2105.01130] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.11077]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. H.Z. Chen et al., Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane, JHEP 10 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2006.04851] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. H.Z. Chen et al., Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane, JHEP 12 (2020) 025 [arXiv:2010.00018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2006.02438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. G. Grimaldi, J. Hernandez and R.C. Myers, Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part IV. Massive black holes on the brane, JHEP 03 (2022) 136 [arXiv:2202.00679] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. F. Holdt-Sørensen, D.A. McGady and N. Wintergerst, Black hole evaporation and semiclassicality at large D, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 026016 [arXiv:1908.08083]. · DOI
  50. R. Emparan and M. Martınez, Black string flow, JHEP 2013 (2013) 68 [arXiv:1307.2276]. · DOI
  51. H. Geng et al., Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 103 [arXiv:2012.04671] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. H. Geng et al., Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity, JHEP 01 (2022) 182 [arXiv:2107.03390] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. H. Geng, S. Lüst, R.K. Mishra and D. Wakeham, Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes, jhep 08 (2021) 003 [arXiv:2104.07039] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. R.-X. Miao, Massless Entanglement Island in Wedge Holography, arXiv:2212.07645 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.07645]. · DOI
  55. R.-X. Miao, Entanglement island and Page curve in wedge holography, JHEP 03 (2023) 214 [arXiv:2301.06285] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. S. Colin-Ellerin, V.E. Hubeny, B.E. Niehoff and J. Sorce, Large-d phase transitions in holographic mutual information, JHEP 2020 (2020) 173 [arXiv:1911.06339]. · DOI
  57. D. Giataganas, N. Pappas and N. Toumbas, Holographic observables at large d, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 026016 [arXiv:2110.14606] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. E. Sorkin, A Critical dimension in the black string phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 031601 [hep-th/0402216] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Emparan, R., Luna, R., Suzuki, R., Tomašević, M., & Way, B.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2023-05-22
Volume
2023
Issue
5
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
24
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review