Cited by 229Psychedelics and Drug StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The meaning-enhancing properties of psychedelics and their mediator role in psychedelic therapy, spirituality, and creativity

Open access
Hartogsohn, Ido·2018·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated to the ability of psychedelics to enhance suggestibility, and pointed to their ability to amplify perception of meaning. This paper examines the existing evidence for the meaning-enhancing properties of psychedelics, and argues that the tendency of these agents to enhance the perception of significance offers valuable clues to explaining their reported ability to stimulate a variety of therapeutic processes, enhance creativity, and instigate mystical-type experiences. Building upon previous research, which suggested the potential role of psychedelic meaning-enhancement in enhancing placebo response, the paper explores the mechanisms by which the meaning-amplifying properties of psychedelics might also play a role in enhancing creativity, as well as in effecting mystical-type experiences. The wider social and public-health implications of this hypothesis are discussed, and suggestions are made as to the various ways in which scientific understanding of the meaning-enhancing properties of psychedelics might be advanced and utilized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2018.00129

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ayahuasca experience could bring new information to the foreground to enrich the therapeutic process, providing an opportunity to transform maladaptive narratives about oneself, other people, or the world.

    “The ayahuasca experience, therefore, could bring new information to the foreground to enrich the therapeutic process, providing an opportunity to transform maladaptive narratives about oneself, other people (including the deceased) or the world (56, 57).”

    From Ayahuasca-assisted meaning reconstruction therapy for grief: a non-randomized clinical trial protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion (no page given) says that psychedelics’ meaning-enhancing effects might assist therapy, and the paper describes them as making mental phenomena more salient. It does not establish that ayahuasca specifically brings new information forward or transforms maladaptive narratives about oneself, others (including the deceased), or the world. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Human ability to meaningfully relate and authentically appreciate experiences is contingent on myriad factors of everyday life.

    “human ability to meaningfully relate and to authentically appreciate experiences is contingent on myriad factors of everyday life”

    From Authenticity and Love Drugs: Insights from Psychedelic Therapy (2026) · cites this paper as Hartogsohn 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bossis A. (2017). The varieties of religious leaders' experiences: the NYU clinical trial on the effects of psilocybin-generated mystical experience in religious leaders, in Psychedelic Science Conference (Oaklande, CA).
  2. Bromell N. K. (2002). Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the 1960s, 1st Edn. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
  3. Lee M. A. Shlain B. (1992). Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: The CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond, Revised. New York, NY: Grove Press.
  4. Otto R. (1958). The Idea of the Holy, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Pahnke W. (1963). Drugs & Mysticism: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Psychedelic Drugs and Mystical Consciousness. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartogsohn, I.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hartogsohn, Ido
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
12
Pages
129-129
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790381919
Cited by
229
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psychedelics, suggestibility, placebo response, creativity, mystical experience, spirituality, psychedelic therapy, mediating mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review