Cited by 438ECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

RR interval signal quality of a heart rate monitor and an ECG Holter at rest and during exercise

Open access
Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel, Schweizer, Theresa, Wyss, Thomas·2019·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the RR interval signal qualities of a Holter device and a heart rate chest belt monitor at rest and during exercise. Ten healthy individuals completed five low- to high-intensity activities while simultaneously using the medilog® AR12plus Holter monitor and the Polar H10 heart rate monitor. The RR interval signal quality was based on the quantification of the missing RR intervals and RR interval detection errors. Therefore, both measurement systems were compared against visual inspection of the raw electrocardiography signal. The missing and wrong R-wave peak detections were counted manually for both measurement systems. RR interval signal quality was defined as the relative number of correctly detected RR intervals. Overall, RR interval signal qualities of 94.6% and 99.6% were demonstrated for the medilog® AR12plus and the Polar H10. During the high-intensity activities, the RR interval signal quality of the medilog® AR12plus dropped to 89.8%, whereas the Polar H10 maintained a signal quality of 99.4%. The correlation between both systems was high (r = 0.997, p > 0.001). The excellent RR interval signal quality during low- to moderate-intensity activities in the medilog® AR12plus and during low- to high-intensity activities in the Polar H10 demonstrates both measurement systems' validity for the detection of RR intervals throughout a wide range of activities. A simple chest strap such as the Polar H10 might be recommended as the gold standard for RR interval assessments if intense activities with strong body movements are investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-019-04142-5

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilgen-Ammann, R., Schweizer, T., & Wyss, T.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen SFISM (CH)
Corresponding author
Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2019-04-19
Volume
119
Issue
7
Pages
1525-1532
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2938169034
Cited by
438
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 2
FWCI
25.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion)
  • BFH: ARBOR
Funders
Polar Electro Oy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
heart rate monitoring, Holter monitor, exercise intensity, measurement validity, body movement artifacts, heart rate response to exercise
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Reference Standards, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review