Cited by 91Action Observation and SynchronizationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability

Launay, Jacques, Dean, Roger T., Bailes, Freya·2014·Cognitive Processing

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that synchronising movements with other people can influence affiliative behaviour towards them. While research has focused on synchronisation with visually observed movement, synchronisation with a partner who is heard may have similar effects. We replicate findings showing that synchronisation can influence ratings of likeability of a partner, but demonstrate that this is possible with virtual interaction, involving a video of a partner. Participants performed instructed synchrony in time to sounds instead of the observable actions of another person. Results show significantly higher ratings of likeability of a partner after moving at the same time as sounds attributed to that partner, compared with moving in between sounds. Objectively quantified synchrony also correlated with ratings of likeability. Belief that sounds were made by another person was manipulated in Experiment 2, and results demonstrate that when sounds are attributed to a computer, ratings of likeability are not affected by moving in or out of time. These findings demonstrate that interaction with sound can be experienced as social interaction in the absence of genuine interpersonal contact, which may help explain why people enjoy engaging with recorded music.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10339-014-0618-0

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchronous activity increases subsequent prosocial behaviour and feelings of affiliation.

    “In addition to the apparent endorphin effect, an expanding body of the literature has consistently shown that synchronous activity increases subsequent prosocial behaviour and feelings of affiliation (e.g. [37–45]).”

    From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Launay, Jacques
Venue
Cognitive Processing
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
491-501
ISSN
  • 1612-4782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4790
OpenAlex
W1979161557
Cited by
91
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
motor synchronization, virtual interaction, affiliation, interpersonal attraction, audio-video synchronization, music enjoyment
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Movement, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Sound, Students, Universities, User-Computer Interface, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review