Cited by 217Fire effects on ecosystemsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest Management and Policy

Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California

Lenihan, James M., Bachelet, Dominique, Neilson, Ronald P., Drapek, Raymond·2008·Climatic Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenihan, J. M., Bachelet, D., Neilson, R. P., & Drapek, R.
Affiliations
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lenihan, James M.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2007-11-30
Volume
87
Issue
S1
Pages
215-230
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2040144539
Cited by
217
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
climate change scenarios, vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, forest fires, carbon sink, net primary productivity, grassland expansion, biomass consumption, California, climate change projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review