Cited by 177Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

A neurological study of compulsive buying behaviour

Raab, Gerhard, Elger, Christian E., Neuner, Michael, Weber, Bernd·2011·Journal of Consumer Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10603-011-9168-3

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raab, G., Elger, C. E., Neuner, M., & Weber, B.
Affiliations
  • Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society (DE)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Raab, Gerhard
Venue
Journal of Consumer Policy
Published
2011-07-28
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
401-413
ISSN
  • 0168-7034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0700
OpenAlex
W2158875109
Cited by
177
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
compulsive buying, neural correlates, purchase decision, decision-making, brain activity, consumer behavior, consumer policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review