Cited by 62Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsTreatment of Major Depression

Metacognitions and Thought Control Strategies in Unipolar Major Depression: A Comparison of Currently Depressed, Previously Depressed, and Never-Depressed Individuals

Halvorsen, Marianne, Hagen, Roger, Hjemdal, Odin, Eriksen, Marianne S., Sørli, Åse J., Waterloo, Knut, Eisemann, Martin, Wang, Catharina E. A.·2015·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-014-9638-4

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings in mental health settings demonstrate that metacognitive beliefs are associated with anxiety and depression and that negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger show the strongest and most reliable relationships with these symptoms.

    “The results of the review mirror findings in mental health settings, which demonstrate that metacognitive beliefs are associated with anxiety and depression [29, 70–77] and that negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger show the strongest and most reliable relationships with these symptoms [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halvorsen, M., Hagen, R., Hjemdal, O., Eriksen, M. S., Sørli, Å. J., Waterloo, K., Eisemann, M., & Wang, C. E. A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Halvorsen, Marianne
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2008013958
Cited by
62
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • Helse- og Omsorgsdepartementet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
metacognition, thought control strategies, unipolar major depression, rumination, worry, punishment, cognitive reappraisal, vulnerability indicators, Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, Ruminative Response Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review