Cited by 14Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The automaticity of positive and negative thinking: a scoping review of mental habits

Colvin, Eamon, Gardner, Benjamin, Labelle, Patrick R., Santor, Darcy·2021·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-021-10218-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Habits of other archetypes, such as smartphone checking habits or mental habits with less clear cueing mechanisms, might differ in their relation to physical and time of day related context.

    “Habits of other archetypes, such as smartphone checking habits that get triggered about every 12 min (Ofcom, 2018), or mental habits with less clear cueing mechanisms (Colvin et al., 2021) might differ in their relation to physical and time of day related context.”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Colvin et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colvin, E., Gardner, B., Labelle, P. R., & Santor, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Colvin, Eamon
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2021-03-15
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1037-1063
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W3138377922
Cited by
13
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
mental habits, automaticity, automatic thoughts, self-criticism, worry, thought content, thought processes, maladaptive thinking, mental health, cognitive therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review