Cited by 442Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Cognitive Load Theory: New Conceptualizations, Specifications, and Integrated Research Perspectives

Open access
Paas, Fred, van Gog, Tamara, Sweller, John·2010·Educational Psychology Review

Abstract

Over the last few years, cognitive load theory has progressed and advanced rapidly. The articles in this special issue, which document those advances, are based on contributions to the 3rd International Cognitive Load Theory Conference (2009), Heerlen, The Netherlands. The articles of this special issue on cognitive load theory discuss new conceptualizations of the different categories of cognitive load, an integrated research perspective of process-oriented and cognitive load approaches to collaborative learning, an integrated research perspective of cognitive and social–cognitive approaches to example-based learning, and a specification of the theory focusing on the acquisition of generalized knowledge structures as a means to facilitate flexible problem-solving skills. This article provides a short introduction to the theory, discusses some of its recent advances, and provides an overview of the contributions to this issue.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article introduces a special issue on cognitive load theory (CLT), summarizing recent conceptual and integrative advances. It frames CLT around human cognitive architecture and previews four contributions on load categories, collaborative learning, example-based learning, and generalized knowledge structures.

Key findings

  • CLT is built on an effectively unlimited long-term memory interacting with a very limited working memory: unrehearsed WM information is lost within about 30 s, and WM processing capacity is limited to 4±1 elements.
  • The special issue’s contributions include Sweller redefining extraneous and germane load in terms of element interactivity; Janssen et al. combining process-oriented and CLT approaches to collaborative learning; Van Gog and Rummel integrating cognitive and social-cognitive perspectives on example-based learning; and Kalyuga et al. emphasizing generalized knowledge structures for flexible problem solving.
  • The introduction reports citation/productivity evidence: six of the top ten most cited articles were concerned with CLT, and four of the top 20 most productive researchers in top educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008 use CLT as a central theory.
  • It argues that reducing extraneous load frees WM resources for intrinsic/germane processing, and that intrinsic load can be managed via part-whole approaches, increased task variability, or self-explanation.

Methods

  • Design: introductory/editorial article for a special issue, based on contributions to the 3rd International Cognitive Load Theory Conference (2009), Heerlen, The Netherlands.
  • Data/sample: no empirical sample or new data; it provides a short introduction to CLT and an overview of the issue’s articles.
  • Analysis: conceptual synthesis and narrative overview of recent CLT advances and the four included contributions.

Limitations

  • The paper states no limitations.
  • Evident from the text: it is not an empirical study and reports no new data or systematic review; its claims are a narrative synthesis of prior literature and the special issue contributions.
  • Evident from the text: the article is an introduction/overview, so it does not independently test the proposed conceptualizations or integrated perspectives.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Guided instructional procedures supported by cognitive load theorists are more effective than unguided instructional procedures used by advocates of discovery or inquiry learning, at least for novice students.

    “P. A. Kirschner et al. (2006) have shown that there exists a clear body of research using controlled experiments indicating that the relatively guided instructional procedures supported by cognitive load theorists are more effective (at least for novice students) than relatively unguided instructional procedures used by advocates of discovery or inquiry learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites P. A. Kirschner et al. (2006) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    F. Kirschner et al. (2009b) have shown that because of the distribution advantage and expanded processing capacity, meaningful learning from tasks that impose a high cognitive load is more likely to occur in a collaborative learning setting than in an individual learning setting.

    “F. Kirschner et al. (2009b) have shown that because of the distribution advantage and expanded processing capacity, meaningful learning from tasks that impose a high cognitive load is more likely to occur in a collaborative learning setting than in an individual learning setting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites F. Kirschner et al. (2009b)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    A large number of elements would result in combinatorial explosions preventing adequate processing.

    “A large number of elements would result in combinatorial explosions preventing adequate processing (Sweller and Sweller 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sweller and Sweller 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Intrinsic load is dependent upon element interactivity, the number of elements that need to be processed simultaneously by the learner.

    “Intrinsic load is dependent upon element interactivity (Sweller and Chandler 1994), the number of elements that need to be processed simultaneously by the learner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sweller and Chandler 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Cognitive load theory has been responsive to challenges of contemporary education by building on theories and research results from other disciplines such as evolutionary biology and neuroscience.

    “the theory has been responsive to the challenges of contemporary education by building on theories and research results from other disciplines, such as evolutionary biology (e.g., Sweller 2003Sweller , 2004;;Sweller and Sweller 2006) and neuroscience (e.g., Kirschner et al. 2009a;Van Gog et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sweller 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sweller and Sweller 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van Gog et al. 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Four of the top 20 most productive researchers identified by Jones et al. (2010) use cognitive load theory as a central theory in their work.

    “Four of the top 20 most productive researchers they identified use cognitive load theory as a central theory in their work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jones et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    When intrinsic cognitive load is high, it becomes important to decrease extraneous cognitive load; otherwise, the combination of both might exceed the maximum cognitive capacity and thus prevent effective, or germane, processing activities to occur.

    “When intrinsic cognitive load is high, it becomes important to decrease extraneous cognitive load; otherwise, the combination of both might exceed the maximum cognitive capacity and thus prevent effective, or germane, processing activities to occur.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Cognitive load theory has evolved by withstanding rigorous tests of falsification, consistent confirmation of existing hypotheses, timely modifications as required by new data, and generation of new hypotheses.

    “the theory has evolved by withstanding rigorous tests of falsification, consistent confirmation of existing hypotheses, timely modifications of the theory as required by new data, and generation of new hypotheses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From an instructional design point of view, it is important to consider extraneous and germane cognitive load as communicating vessels, because the reduction of extraneous cognitive load can free cognitive resources for an increase in germane cognitive load.

    “From an instructional design point of view, it is important to consider extraneous and germane cognitive load as communicating vessels, because the reduction of extraneous cognitive load can free cognitive resources for an increase in germane cognitive load (Paas et al. 2003a, b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paas et al. 2003a, b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Working memory has two well-known characteristics: when processing novel information, it is very limited in both duration and capacity.

    “WM has two well-known characteristics: when processing novel information, it is very limited in both duration (Peterson and Peterson 1959) and capacity (Baddeley 1992;Miller 1956).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Peterson and Peterson 1959 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Baddeley 1992 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Miller 1956 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Because intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load are additive, an increase in extraneous cognitive load reduces the working memory resources available to deal with intrinsic cognitive load and hence reduces germane cognitive load.

    “Because intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load are additive, an increase in extraneous cognitive load reduces the WM resources available to deal with intrinsic cognitive load and hence reduces germane cognitive load.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive load theory identifies three categories of cognitive load: intrinsic, extraneous, and germane.

    “CLT identifies three categories of cognitive load: intrinsic, extraneous, and germane (Paas et al. 2003b;Sweller et al. 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Paas et al. 2003b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sweller et al. 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cognitive load theory has survived and become influential for both scientific and practical reasons.

    “There are both scientific and practical reasons why CLT has survived and become influential.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Decreasing extraneous cognitive load frees resources to deal with intrinsic cognitive load and thus increases germane cognitive load.

    “Decreasing extraneous cognitive load frees resources to deal with intrinsic cognitive load and thus increases germane cognitive load.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    If element interactivity is high, learning becomes difficult and working memory-resource intensive, whereas for low element interactivity material, learning is easier, requiring fewer working memory resources.

    “If element interactivity is high, learning becomes difficult and WM-resource intensive, whereas for low element interactivity material, learning is easier, requiring fewer WM resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    While novel information only can be stored for brief periods with severe limitations on the amount of such information, when dealing with previously learned information stored in long-term memory, these limitations disappear.

    “While novel information only can be stored for brief periods with severe limitations on the amount of such information, when dealing with previously learned information stored in LTM, these limitations disappear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Cognitive load theory was devised in part as a reaction to the failure of many other theories advocating the acquisition of general knowledge structures.

    “it could be argued that CLT was devised in part as a reaction to the failure of many other theories advocating the acquisition of general knowledge structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In both cases, the nature of the task is changed in a manner that appropriately increases intrinsic cognitive load and thus increases the working memory resources required, resulting in increases in germane cognitive load.

    “In both cases, the nature of the task is changed in a manner that appropriately increases intrinsic cognitive load and thus increases the WM resources required, resulting in increases in germane cognitive load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Previously organized and stored information in long-term memory is not prone to combinatorial explosions, and thus, the limitations that must be imposed on novel information do not apply to familiar information.

    “Previously organized and stored information in LTM is not prone to combinatorial explosions, and thus, the limitations that must be imposed on novel information do not apply to familiar information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other effective ways to increase germane load are by increasing the variability of learning tasks or asking learners to self-explain how they arrived at a problem solution.

    “Other effective ways to increase germane load are by increasing the variability of learning tasks (e.g., Paas and Van Merriënboer 1994) or asking learners to self-explain how they arrived at a problem solution (e.g., Renkl 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Paas and Van Merriënboer 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Renkl 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The success of cognitive load theory derives to a large extent from its emphasis on domain-specific knowledge.

    “The success of CLT derives to a large extent from its emphasis on domain-specific knowledge”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studying worked examples instead of solving conventional problems has been identified as an effective way of reducing extraneous load, because the learner can devote all available working memory capacity to studying a worked-out solution and constructing a schema for solving similar problems in long-term memory.

    “Studying worked examples (instead of solving conventional problems) has been identified as an effective way of reducing extraneous load, because the learner can devote all available WM capacity to studying a worked-out solution and constructing a schema for solving similar problems in LTM (e.g., Paas 1992; Paas and Van Gog 2006)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Paas 1992 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Paas and Van Gog 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Instruction most frequently deals with information that is novel for learners.

    “Instruction most frequently deals with information that is novel for learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In collaborative learning settings, the cognitive load associated with carrying out a learning task can be distributed across multiple collaborating working memories, which reduces the risk of overloading each group member and creates a larger reservoir of cognitive resources.

    “In collaborative learning settings, the cognitive load associated with carrying out a learning task can be distributed across those multiple collaborating working memories, which reduces the risk of overloading each group member and creates a larger reservoir of cognitive resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Working memory limitations apply to novel information, and hence, it is the structure of that information that must be carefully considered.

    “WM limitations apply to that information, and hence, it is the structure of that information that must be carefully considered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    For many years, cognitive load theory has provided a source of novel, instructional design procedures.

    “For many years, the theory has provided a source of novel, instructional design procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    According to the cognitive load theory perspective, a group of collaborative learners can be considered as an information processing system, consisting of multiple, limited working memories that can create a collective working space.

    “According to the CLT perspective, a group of collaborative learners can be considered as an information processing system (Hinsz et al. 1997), consisting of multiple, limited WMs that can create a collective working space.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hinsz et al. 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

22 of 22
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Most knowledge does not have to be gained from experience but can be borrowed from other people.

    “The theory assumes that most knowledge does not have to be gained from experience but can be borrowed from other people (which has an obvious evolutionary advantage)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term memory is effectively unlimited.

    “This architecture consists of an effectively unlimited long-term memory (LTM)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term memory stores previously acquired information.

    “LTM stores previously acquired information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Working memory processes information either prior to it being stored in long-term memory or after it has been stored.

    “WM processes information either prior to it being stored in LTM or after it has been stored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Working memory can be equated with consciousness.

    “It can be equated with consciousness, in the sense that we are only conscious of the information currently being processed in WM and are oblivious of the far larger amount of information stored in LTM.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term memory is the central structure of human cognition.

    “LTM is viewed as the central structure of human cognition.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term memory contains huge amounts of knowledge that can be described as hierarchically organized schemas.

    “It contains huge amounts of knowledge that can be described as hierarchically organized schemas that allow us to categorize different problem states and decide upon the most appropriate solution moves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The extent of knowledge held in long-term memory determines the level of performance by an individual in a given area.

    “The extent of knowledge held in LTM determines the level of performance by an individual in a given area.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals have limited cognitive resources that can be overwhelmed if the load exceeds their capacity.

    “the theory of cognitive load, which suggests that individuals have limited cognitive resources that can be overwhelmed if the load exceeds their capacity (Paas, Van Gog, & Sweller, 2010).”

    From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Paas, Van Gog, & Sweller, 2010

  • Working memory is limited in capacity when processing information and in time when holding information.

    “One of the main assumptions of CLT is that working memory is limited in capacity, when processing information, as well as in time, when it comes to holding information (Paas et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (this issue). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jones, S. J., Fong, C. J., Torres, L. G., Yoo, J. H., Decker, M. L., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Productivity in educational psychology journals from 2003–2008. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 11–16. · DOI
  4. Kalyuga, S., Renkl, A., & Paas, F. (this issue). Facilitating flexible problem solving: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review.
  5. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31–42. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Effects of individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks on efficiency of retention and transfer performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306–314. · DOI
  7. Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980–2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 559–580. · DOI
  8. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003a). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2003b). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469–508. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 12, 185–233.
  15. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434–458. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–295. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (this issue). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social–cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. · DOI
  19. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror-neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualisations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21–30. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–178. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paas, F., van Gog, T., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Paas, Fred
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
115-121
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2011458368
Cited by
442
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
cognitive load theory, cooperative learning, process-oriented learning, social cognitive learning, learning from examples, flexible problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review