The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it may boost accountability and decrease corruption but can also contribute to the aforementioned harmful forms of polarization”
From Political polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review (2024) · cites this paper as Rogowski & Sutherland, 2016
In the citing paper
“This hypothesis combines findings indicating that more ideological distance from a candidate or party increases affective polarization (Rogowski & Sutherland, 2016;Harteveld, 2021;Ryan, 2023) with research on partisan bias since the ideological distance is perceived and not actual in this case.”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Rogowski & Sutherland, 2016
In the citing paper
“In addition, the more intense the sense of ideological divergence, the greater the antipathy toward the outgroups (Rogowski & Sutherland, 2016).”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Rogowski & Sutherland, 2016
In the citing paper
“Recent work indicates that while ideological polarization, sorting, and affective polarization are correlated (Rogowski & Sutherland 2016, Bougher 2017, Webster & Abramowitz 2017), the relationship is weak, with sorting accounting for only about 5% of the variance in affective polarization (Lelkes 2018, Mason 2018a).”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Rogowski & Sutherland 2016
In the citing paper
“Likewise, ideological polarization in general — not just on specific issues or values — can drive affective polarization.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“In feeling thermometer ratings, participants were more affectively polarized in the divergent condition, expressing more warmth towards the more extreme candidate whose ideology they shared and less warmth towards the more extreme candidate whose ideology they did not share. This effect was stronger for participants who were more interested in politics and more ideologically extreme themselves83.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“several experiments have demonstrated that representing political elites as highly polarized (either in terms of ideological abstractions or specific issue positions) leads participants to express higher levels of issue-based and affective polarization39,83.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
An Economic Theory of Democracy
Marvick, D., & Downs, A. J. (1960) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/444355 · Cited by 4,290
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,109
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Spatial Models of Party Competition
Stokes, D. (1963) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952828 · Cited by 1,970
Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3551 · Cited by 1,793
The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans
Levendusky, M. (2009) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001 · Cited by 1,698
Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000) · Cited by 1,686
(2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,673
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 504
The road leading apart: majoritarianism and affective polarisation in Hungary
Gál, A. (2026) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2026.2646528 · Cited by 1
Khudoley, К., Kolotaev, Y. Y., Yarygin, G., & Koloskov, E. A. (2025) · International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy · doi:10.46272/it.2024.22.3-4.78-79.2 · Cited by 1
Kotz, J., Giese, H., Breunig, C., Sterba, M.-B., Brack, N., Dumont, P., Taflaga, M., Olivera, J., Sheffer, L., Werner, A., et al. (2026) · Communications Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s44458-026-00113-y · Cited by 1
What is Political Polarization?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Social identity processes predicting post‐election 2020 ideological extremism
Le, A., Brown, J. K., & Hohman, Z. P. (2022) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12331 · Cited by 2
Política exterior colombiana: élites, opinión e identidad
Salle, U. D. L., Niño, C., Sánchez, F., & Arboleda, U. S. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch7 · Cited by 1
Wiezel, A., & Wagner, J. K. (2023) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8135 · Cited by 2
Cultural Animal Theory of Political Partisan Conflict and Hostility
Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2192642 · Cited by 1
Tipos de polarización en las elecciones presidenciales de Colombia de 2022
Barreto, I., Revelo, D. R., Garzón‐Velandia, D. C., Zárate-Ceballos, H., Gómez-Garzón, L. F., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2024) · Análisis Político · doi:10.15446/anpol.v37n108.117272 · Cited by 6
Arminio, L., & Rossi, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78548-1_14 · Cited by 1
Making the other side mad: How out‐group distaste benefits less competent candidates
Strayhorn, J. A. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12948 · Cited by 1
Shoai, A. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf044 · Cited by 1
Sui, C. Y. (2026) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2026.10120 · Cited by 1
La justicia bajo la lupa: Confianza en el poder judicial y percepciones sobre su independencia
Andes, U. D. L., Becerra, C. I. G., Gutiérrez, M., & Lozano, U. J. T. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch5 · Cited by 1
Seccional, C. D. I. E. P., Subinas, J., García-Rendón, S., & (CIEPS), C. I. D. E. P. Y. S. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch6 · Cited by 1
Ecolalia en adultos sanos: correlatos cognitivos y conductuales
Morales, S. V. (2022) · UMA Editorial eBooks · doi:10.24310/mumaedmumaed.5314 · Cited by 1
"Unmotivated Bias" and Partisan Hostility: Empirical EvidencePreprint
Stone, D. (2018) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/hr5ba · Cited by 1
Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2020) · ENDOXA · doi:10.5944/endoxa.45.2020.22850 · Cited by 1
Polarized Justice? Changing Patterns of Decision-Making in the Federal CourtsPreprint
Kritzer, H. M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3187627 · Cited by 1
The 'Truth Contagion' Effect in the US Political Online DebatePreprint
Carrella, F., Aroyehun, S. T., Lasser, J., Simchon, A., García, D., & Lewandowsky, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qx34w · Cited by 1
Providing Details of Payoff Structure Can Reduce Polarization: Laboratory ExperimentsPreprint
Arai, K., Asako, Y., Hino, A., & Morikawa, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4684602 · Cited by 1
Tella, R. D., Gálvez, R. H., & Schargrodsky, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4721023 · Cited by 1
Targeted Protest and Affective PolarizationPreprint
Sato, Y. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4157188/v1 · Cited by 1
A Role for News Media in Mass Polarization during the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Ye, W., Aron, L., & Gondwe, G. (2024) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2024-8605t
¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España
Rojo-Martínez, J. M. (2025) · Papers. Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.3363
Cuéllar Rivero, R. (2026) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.194.25-44
Measurement Considerations and Research Design
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.013
Facebook in Context: Theorizing Interaction on Twenty-First-Century Social Media
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.002 · Cited by 1
The Role of Ideology Through the Lens of Primary Elections
Walsh, M. P. (2020) · Fisher Digital Publications (St. John Fisher College)
Populism and Leader Polarization in Venezuela, Ecuador, and Turkey
Selçuk, O. (2019) · FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc007060 · Cited by 1
How Does Electoral Law Affect Legislative Polarization?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0006
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0004
What are the Consequences of Polarization for Public Policy and Governance?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0007
Are Partisan Elites Polarized?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0003
What are the Causes of Polarization?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0005
Is the Trump Presidency a New Normal or More of the Same?
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0008
Anger and the Future of American Government
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.008
A Fundamental Change in Political Communication
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.001
Trait-Based Anger and Governmental Distrust
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.004
How Do END Interactions on the News Feed Psychologically Polarize Users?
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.004 · Cited by 1
The Causal Effect of Anger on Trust in Government
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.005
Political Elites and the Strategic Use of Anger
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.003
Biased Inference from END Interactions
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.007
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.007
The END Framework of Political Interaction on Social Media
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.003
Emerging political conflicts and the role of personality
Peresman, A. (2021) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.012
Who is it okay to punch?Preprint
Gonzalez, F. J., & McCoy, A. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/uh6bt
The Deeply Involved Are Different
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.005
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.011
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.001
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.008
A House Divided against Itself?
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.002
Anger and Democratic Values in the Mass Public
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.006
Subtleties of Partisan Division
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.003
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.010
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.009
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.012
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.006
The Rise of Anger in the American Public
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.002
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.004
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.010
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.009
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.013
Perceptions of the Most Sacred Duty
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.007
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.001
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.010
Erasing the Coast of Bohemia in the Era of Social Media
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.009
Political Inference from Content on the News Feed
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.006
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.011
In the Eye of the Beholder: Politically Informative News Feed Content
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.005
Settle, J. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560573.008
Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.025
Party Identification and Social Relationships: Exploring the Causal MechanismsPreprint
Ogura, I. (2022) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2022-vgw52
Individual narcissism, need for closure and the two sides of negative partisanshipPreprint
Mayer, S. J. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/aejt7
McCarty, N. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.003.0001
Crisis of democracy : protest and affective polarization
Yuko, S. (2021) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/90088 · Cited by 1
Zapirain, G. S. (2022) · INGURUAK REVISTA VASCA DE SOCIOLOGÍA Y CIENCIA POLÍTICA · doi:10.18543/inguruak.213
Influencing a Polarized and Connected LegislaturePreprint
Chaudhury, R. D., Leister, C. M., & Rai, B. K. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4110774
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0004
Measuring Policy Orientations and Political Sophistication
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0004
A Test of How Elite Polarization Shapes Mass Political Behavior
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0007
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0002 · Cited by 1
How Political Sophistication Shapes Responses to Elite Polarization
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0008
Elite Polarization and Americans’ Perceptions of the Political Parties
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0003
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0007
The Relationships between Policy Orientations, Partisanship, and Vote Choice
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0006
The Implications of Our Polarized Politics
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0009
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0003
A Test of the Recursive Relationship between Policy Orientations and Partisanship
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0005
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0001
de Valencia, U., Bohigues, A., Otero, J. M. R., & de Salamanca, U. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch11
del Norte, U., Rodríguez, A. R., Mendoza, C. E. G., del Atlántico, U., Ramírez, D. A., & del Norte, U. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch2
EAFIT, U., & Ramírez-Baracaldo, A. M. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch10
La funcionalidad de los partidos políticos en Colombia (2006-2018)
Arboleda, U. S., González, C., & Liendo, N. A. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch9
La democracia entre las armas: la percepción de los legisladores colombianos (1998-2018)
de Colombia, U. E., Montilla, P., Rubio, T. A. G., & de Colombia, U. E. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch8
Renovación y estabilidad en el Congreso de Colombia, 1974-2018
del Valle, U., & Daza, J. D. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch1
Profesionalización de las élites parlamentarias en Colombia (1998-2022)
de Salamanca, U., Pérez, C. R., Manjón, M. B., & de Goethe, U. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch3
Actitudes de los legisladores colombianos frente a la desigualdad de género
de Medellín, U., Auza, M. A., Sendra, M., & de Salamanca, U. (2022) · Editorial EAFIT eBooks · doi:10.17230/9789587208092ch4
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rogowski, Jon C.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2015-10-28
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 485-508
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W1858975100
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 75.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- affective polarization, political polarization, ideological divergence, ideological commitment, political interest, United States senators, biographical information, public opinion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
