The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is a relevant task since, in view of the revised literature, we conclude that perceived polarization influences negative evaluations of opposing parties more than actual polarization, although we almost always focus on the latter (Enders & Armaly, 2019).”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Enders & Armaly, 2019
In the citing paper
“That is, false polarization might increase affective and/or ideological polarization over time156 because prejudice can arise from even the illusory perception of dissimilarity between in-group and out-group members89,155,157.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [156]
Citations
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569
Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity
HUDDY, L., MASON, L., & AARØE, L. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000604 · Cited by 1,415
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,367
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fiorina, M., & Levendusky, M. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In D. Brady & P. Nivola (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics, causes, and consequences of America’s polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and the Hoover Institution Press.
- Hetherington, M. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. Red and Blue Nation, 2, 1–33.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4 · Cited by 259
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005 · Cited by 220
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Hartman, R., Blakey, W., Womick, J., Bail, C., Finkel, E. J., Han, H., Sarrouf, J., Schroeder, J., Sheeran, P., Van Bavel, J. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3 · Cited by 171
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence
Mernyk, J. S., Pink, S. L., Druckman, J. N., & Willer, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116851119 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Enders, A. M., & Armaly, M. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Armaly, Miles T.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2018-06-19
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 815-839
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2809133613
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 34.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- mass polarization, perceived polarization, partisanship, voting behavior, political participation, public trust in government, political efficacy, American National Election Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
