The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is a relevant task since, in view of the revised literature, we conclude that perceived polarization influences negative evaluations of opposing parties more than actual polarization, although we almost always focus on the latter (Enders & Armaly, 2019).”
From ¿Demasiado lejos? Cómo la polarización mal percibida alimenta la polarización afectiva en España (2025) · cites this paper as Enders & Armaly, 2019
In the citing paper
“That is, false polarization might increase affective and/or ideological polarization over time156 because prejudice can arise from even the illusory perception of dissimilarity between in-group and out-group members89,155,157.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [156]
Citations
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569
Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity
HUDDY, L., MASON, L., & AARØE, L. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000604 · Cited by 1,415
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,367
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608080493 · Cited by 1,308
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
The big sort: why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2303 · Cited by 1,172
Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization
Hetherington, M. J. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401003045 · Cited by 1,037
Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088434 · Cited by 887
The disappearing center: engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-1737 · Cited by 864
Ansolabehere, S. D., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055408080210 · Cited by 737
The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences
Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/697253 · Cited by 586
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7 · Cited by 503
Why Washington Won't Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226299358.001.0001 · Cited by 486
Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?
Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455 · Cited by 419
The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy
Han, H. (2011) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfr042 · Cited by 381
The Relationship between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior
Palfrey, T. R., & Poole, K. T. (1987) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111281 · Cited by 379
Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569849 · Cited by 363
(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public
Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv045 · Cited by 356
Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization
Ahler, D. J. (2014) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381614000085 · Cited by 289
Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381611000016 · Cited by 229
Why Washington won't work: polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis
(2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.194934 · Cited by 222
Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.
Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020697 · Cited by 219
Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter
Smidt, C. D. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12218 · Cited by 174
Suhay, E. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9269-1 · Cited by 151
Understanding Misunderstanding: Social Psychological Perspectives
Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Ross, L. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.038 · Cited by 120
Red States vs. Blue States: Going Beyond the Mean
Levendusky, M. S., & Pope, J. (2011) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfr002 · Cited by 87
Naï Realism and Affirmative Action: Adversaries are More Similar Than They Think
Sherman, D. K., Nelson, L. D., & Ross, L. D. (2003) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2504_2 · Cited by 67
Disgust, Anxiety, and Political Learning in the Face of Threat
Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12350 · Cited by 64
False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology
Kenyon, T. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0438-x · Cited by 61
The Impact of Elite Polarization on Partisan Ambivalence and Indifference
Thornton, J. R. (2012) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9196-y · Cited by 55
Moral, M. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9386-0 · Cited by 53
Federico, C. M. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204263787 · Cited by 38
Assortative Mating on Ideology Could Operate Through Olfactory Cues
McDermott, R., Tingley, D. H., & Hatemi, P. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12133 · Cited by 29
The Role of Indifference in Split-Ticket Voting
Davis, N. T. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9266-9 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fiorina, M., & Levendusky, M. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In D. Brady & P. Nivola (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics, causes, and consequences of America’s polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and the Hoover Institution Press.
- Hetherington, M. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. Red and Blue Nation, 2, 1–33.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4 · Cited by 259
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005 · Cited by 220
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Hartman, R., Blakey, W., Womick, J., Bail, C., Finkel, E. J., Han, H., Sarrouf, J., Schroeder, J., Sheeran, P., Van Bavel, J. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3 · Cited by 171
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence
Mernyk, J. S., Pink, S. L., Druckman, J. N., & Willer, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116851119 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Enders, A. M., & Armaly, M. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Armaly, Miles T.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2018-06-19
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 815-839
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2809133613
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 34.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- mass polarization, perceived polarization, partisanship, voting behavior, political participation, public trust in government, political efficacy, American National Election Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review